HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Cal33 » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next »

Cal33

Profile Information

Member since: Sat Jun 13, 2009, 06:39 PM
Number of posts: 4,906

Journal Archives

To those who think Hillary Clinton is not a Third-Way Adherent, please read the

link below:

http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/12/12/hillary-clinton-tells-wall-street-she-believes-anti-wall-street-rhetoric-foolish/

If a Third-Wayer should win in the Democratic Primaries in 2016, I'd be very

disappointed, but I'd still vote for her/him. The Reason?

We'd still have 4 to 8 years of status quo. It's shitty, I agree, but the Democratic
Party would, at least, still be partially alive -- and where there is life, there's hope.

On the other hand, if a Republican were to win the presidency in 2016, I believe
that this time, all semblance of democracy still existing in our nation could very
well become history. Quite possibly there would be no more free elections. Or if
there should be any elections, they would be of the type used by Stalin in the days
of the former USSR -- just for show only. The Republicans' present-day practice
of fraudulent elections will be nothing compared to what will be in store for us.

The Republicans did not make an all-out Putsch to take over full control of the
entire country during GW Bush's two terms in office. I believe that the main
reason was that they were not quite sure of success at that time -- and a failure
in something of this magnitude would have been an absolute disaster for them!

That was then. Today the story is different. The Republicans have been gaining
considerably in strength and power. They might no longer hesitate about making
their strike! If the Republicans should gain control of all three branches of
government in 2016, it could very well spell the end of democracy in our country
altogether.

This is the main reason why I would still vote for a Third-Wayer. Where there is
life, there is hope -- the hope that more Americans will finally learn that Third-
Wayers' political views and what they stand for are simply too inadequate and
incompetent to accomplish any real change. So, in the following election, there is
the hope that a Real Democrat will finally be elected.

To those who would not vote for a Third-Way winner under any circumstances,
please be reminded that a short-term reaction to disappointment is understandable,
but don't just stop there. Please take a good look at the possible long-term
consequences of your not voting. Whether or not democracy will continue to exist
in our nation at all could be dependent upon what you choose to do. It's an awfully
big and huge decision you will be making!!!

Good luck to us all.


It has always been this way since the beginning of history. And the reason?: between 2% and 4%

of the world's population is socio- or psychopathic, just as roughly 1% of the world's population is
schizophrenic.

Psychopaths can't help wanting more profits as well as control over other people. They are highly
ambitious and keep on going after more money and power. Yes, they are conscienceless -- this is
part of their nature.

Eventually they will win and take full control. Also, eventually again, the time will come when they,
too, will be overthrown. This will happen when the vast majority of the people can't take it
anymore, and realize who is causing their misery. This has been happening over and over again
throughout history, and all over the world.

Recently, 4 or 5 genes have been identified in the genetic make-up of psychopaths. It must also be
said here that there are sociopaths who do not have these genes. Perhaps they became sociopathic
through their upbringing. (I use the words sociopath and psychopath interchangeably).

If the human race survives long enough, it might be possible for future scientists to manipulate those
genes, so that no babies will be born with them. Scientists might also learn how to educate parents
how to raise their children, so that environment will no longer be a cause in the formation of socio- and
psychopathic personalities.

I hope humans will survive long enough to see that day. We are now so advanced technologically that,
unlike earlier times, we might not be able to survive another World War. This is the big difference
between the past and the present.

Princeton makes it official: USA has become an Oligarchy


by F. William Engdahl | November 11, 2014

<< American media is fond of speaking about “Russian Oligarchs” as if Russia were the only nation that allowed accumulation of such unprecedented wealth. The Yeltsin days of dis-order and collapse indeed saw the rapid rise of many fortunes and oligarchs—persons of very much wealth. Some of them have proven patriotic citizens, some like Khodokorvsky or the late unlamented Boris Berezhovsky proved to be loveless gangsters. A new study, however by a Princeton University Professor of the influence of very wealthy or economically powerful persons on American political policies makes clear for the first time that a genuine American Oligarchy has staged a slow coup d’etat over US foreign and domestic policy over the past three decades since the era of Ronald Reagan. This American oligarchy today is the major force for war and dis-order across the planet.

--------------------------------------------

Martin Gilens is Professor of Politics at Princeton University together with Benjamin I. Page Professor at Northwestern University have published results of a unique analysis “using a unique data set that includes measures of the key variables for 1,779 policy issues.” The study concludes that, “Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination…”

---------------------------------------------------

In a subsequent media interview, Gilens noted what they concluded in their analysis of volumes of data from 1981-2002 for government policy decisions and the role of elites versus ordinary citizens in some 1,800 different policy initiatives: “One central factor is the role of money in our political system, and the overwhelming role that affluent individuals that affluent individuals and organized interests play, in campaign finance and in lobbying. And the second thing is the lack of mass organizations that represent and facilitate the voice of ordinary citizens. Part of that would be the decline of unions in the country which has been quite dramatic over the last 30 or 40 years. And part of it is the lack of a socialist or a worker’s party.” Party now or in the future].

The study verifies with ample empirical data what I have witnessed during the course of my own life as an American over the past four decades. There has been a silent coup d’etat of the monied class, an American oligarchy. Names such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Sheldon Adelson (main financier of Mitt Romney for President), the Koch Brothers (main financiers of the Tea Party political movement), George H.W. Bush and family. The top 1% have reshaped the fundamentals of American life, culture and above all politics. A decision to wage war today against Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria depends not on the will of average Americans. Obama was elected on a pledge to close the US Army torture center at Guantanamo and six years on has yet to do. He won a Nobel Peace Prize in his first month and proceeded to wage more war in Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya and most recently Syria and Ukraine.

It is important to have this in mind when judging “America.” The United States of America today bears little resemblance to that I knew when I grew up in the early 1960’s, when a used good Chevy cost $650 and college tuition could be afforded by ordinary Americans if they were willing to study. The oligarchy that has taken policy control behind a thin façade of “democracy” has ultimately ruined the industrial and social fabric of the United States. They are the ones behind the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or bank deregulation so they can loot the planet. This new study by Princeton’s Prof. Gilens is a refreshing attempt, even if academic and from one of the most elite academic universities, to shed some light on what is fundamentally wrong with America over the past three decades. >>

Small wonder that the GOP is afraid of Elizabeth Warren, she is fighting for the life of and trying to resuscitate the American
Middle-Class. They are afraid that she might succeed.

http://www.infowars.com/princeton-makes-it-official-usa-has-become-oligarchy/

Bernie Sanders to propose bill to break up big banks, he'll be supported by Sherrod Brown. But, i

question if there will be enough time for it to succeed, because the Republicans will
have the majority in the Senate in 2 weeks+. I wish Bernie had thought of this sooner.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/14/1351830/-Bernie-Sanders-To-Intro-Bill-to-Break-Up-Big-Banks?detail=facebook#

With Elizabeth Warren, the Dem. Party can be in for a serious change - for real, this time:

This is what the vast majority of Democrats really want. We've been waiting so long
that it seemed to be forever. And now suddenly, here is Elizabeth! She definitely is
our best hope! I think this is why her popularity went up as rapidly and fast as a
shooting star.

http://www.salon.com/2014/12/12/elizabeth_warren_goes_to_war_why_the_democratic_party_could_seriously_change_for_real_this_time/?source=newsletter

More than 300 former campaign staffers and organizers for Pres. Obama have signed on to letter to

Elizabeth Warren asking her to run .....

Many are volunteering to work for her, but she has yet to give any sign of even considering
to make such a move.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/12/elizabeth-warren-2016_n_6315658.html

One way of improving the quality of police officers:

Stories of police brutality seem to be popping up all over the country of late. I remember
having read not long ago that police departments have the practice of hiring as police officers
applicants whose IQs are 102 to 104. They do not hire applicants with higher IQs because
these tend to get bored with the job, and too many of them quit before long. It takes a lot
of money to train police officers, and their quitting early becomes too expensive.

An IQ of 100 is smack in the middle, or 50 percentile. So 102 to 104 is very slightly above
average. Could this be one of the reasons for the wave of police over-reactions in situations
that require good judgment?

We all know that police officers have to use good judgment in dealing with people, and quite
often life-and-death situations are involved in their work. Intelligent people tend to have
better judgment than less intelligent ones. But police departments don't hire those with
higher intelligence because of the reason described above.

Perhaps if they hired as policemen only those with an IQ of at least 110, the number of police-
connected deaths might come down? If more intelligent applicants are given to understand
that the chances of promotion for doing a good job are excellent, as well as other incentives
(such as being allowed to do other more interesting jobs, in addition to working their beat)
they would be more willing to stay.

I think we should have as police officers those who are more intelligent and have better
judgment than average. Plain average is simply not enough.

Which is more important, money or human lives?

"Coffers are full...." For the rich, yes. But the middle-class and the poor are still going

through hell. The fact that the Dow has gone up higher than ever plays little
or no role for the middle-class. They are still being underpaid, and many are
unemployed. The 5.8 unemployment figure applies only to those who are still
looking for jobs. Many have given up after years of fruitless search.

50 years ago the average CEO was making some 40 times more than the
average worker in his company. Today, the difference is several hundred times.

So much for the "coffers are full." Don't let yourself be fooled.

Sen. Sanders unveils his 12-point economic plan. I guess he is serious about running for president.

He is one of the people I am in favor of. Officially he may be an Independent, but he is more
Progressive than many a Democrat, and he has consistently voted with the Democrats on the
Progressive side.

He is stating loud and clear here on what's wrong with the American economy, and how to go about
correcting them. He is very much in sync. with Elizabeth Warren:


http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/videos/video/sen-bernie-sanders-unveils-12-point-economic-plan
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next »