HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Cal33 » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next »


Profile Information

Member since: Sat Jun 13, 2009, 06:39 PM
Number of posts: 6,892

Journal Archives

Hey, Arcane, just bring up the topic of Debbie W. Schultz's having rigged the Democratic

Primary Debate schedule 2016, and they'll keep quiet. This is something that nobody
can deny without appearing to be foolish.

No matter how one tries to put down Sanders with propaganda, here are incontrovertible facts from

Real Clear Politics that Sanders is way ahead of Clinton at beating the Republicans:

Sanders beats Trump (April - 1 May) 6 out of 6
Sanders beats Cruz ( " " ) 5 out of 5
Sanders beats Kasich ( " " ) 4 out of 4

Clinton beats Trump ( " " ) 4 out of 6
Clinton beats Cruz ( " " ) 5 out of 5
Clinton LOSES to Kasich ( " " ) 4 out of 4

And this isn't just a one-time affair. It has been so ever since the summer of 2015!!!
The only sure Democratic candidate to beat the Republicans is Sanders. Here is the
undeniable proof!!!


Election Fraud Watch 2016 - Corruption:

This Article, dated 5-15-2016, begins with:

"How US Elections Are Stolen on Rigged Machines," then follows a description of
what had happened in

California (CA will be voting in 3 weeks),
West Virginia,
and New York.

There's a final piece named: "Believe your Eyes: Evidence of Democratic Primary
Elections Fraud."

The entire article is relatively brief, considering the amount of material it covers.
Edited: (Loads of pictures).


What's Really Going On In Our Nation?

The Republican Party is split into:

a. The Republican Establishment. I 've read that they are trying to get some leading
politician to start a "Third Party," but so far there are no takers. Can this mean that
the Corporatists are losing their grip on the Republican Party?

b. Donald Trump is nominally a Republican, but basically he seems to be his own man.
He doesn't take orders from anybody, not even the Corporatists -- but he is now
the Republican nominee for the presidency.

The Democratic Party is also split:

c. The Democratic Establishment. Hillary Clinton is ahead in the presidential race, and
the Democratic Establishment is backing her up all the way. The Corporatists have
both of them under control. So has the Democratic Establishment now taken over the
place that the Republican Establishment used to have?

d. Bernie Sanders is anti-Corporatist and anti-Establishment. He is a Progressive/
Liberal. If he should lose the Primaries, will he join Hillary or not?

The American people in general:

e. All national polls since the summer of 2015 show that Sanders is the favorite of the
American people for president -- he is way ahead of both Clinton and Trump. But it
looks like he will be losing in the Primaries to Clinton, and Sanders won't be able to get
to the General Election.

f. Polls show that Clinton and Trump are the two presidential candidates with the
lowest favorability rating ever in the history of the U.S. The majority of the American
people simply have a highly negative opinion about both of them, yet Trump has
already won the his Party nomination for president, and Clinton will likely win also.
With our present Election System, the will of the people never did count for much.
Edit: And the majority of the American people are totally fed-up with the present
state of affairs.

What could possibly be the out-come of the above mumbo-jumbo mix-up of events?

1. Could the Democratic and Republican Establishments unite and become one?

2. Could Trump and Sanders become leaders of their own supporters and separate
into new Parties -- In which case there would be 3 or even 4 Parties?

3. Could this be the beginning of the end of the Corporatists' death-grip on
our nation?

I am sure there are other possibilities of what might happen. Your guess is as good
as mine -- but CHANGE IS IN THE AIR.

Please see my reply #12 above.

Islam is also 6 centuries younger than Christianity. I think religions also go through

a maturation process, just like people do. The Inquisition was started by Pope Innocent III
around 1230. He wanted to make sure that the people learned the correct Christian teachings.
There already were many deviations from the Catholic Church's points of view at that time.
Pope Innocent III did not order the torture and burning at the stake.

The above horror was begun by the second or third pope after Innocent III. The Inquisition
was officially banned only in 1830 (although the torture and burnings at the stake had stopped
long before then). The Inquisition lasted 6 centuries.

Today, I believe it's the fanatics who are giving Islam a bad name. These fanatics, in my
opinion, are sadistic people to begin with. They are using religion as an excuse to vent their
passions, just as the Christian sadists were doing at the time of the Inquisition. These were
the socio- and psychopaths of that time. The sociopaths of today can be found - for example -
among the Corporate Power people, who are amassing millions and billions for themselves by
hook and by crook, and they couldn't care less about causing the deaths of millions through
Wars for Profit, and the millions of former Middle-Class people whom they have pauperized,
and many of whom are also dying from want and inability to pay for medical care.

Bernie is losing the Primaries only because of crooked means. If it had been a fair

contest, he would have been way ahead of Hillary. In spite of the Primaries, he has
always bested Hillary in simulated national polls, where all are permitted to vote.
And Bernie always won in these polls by large margins -- every single time. This
means that the majority of Americans want Bernie for president. It is only through
the devious ways and means of the Democratic Establishment people that Hillary is
leading in the Democratic Primaries. In short, as someone pointed out earlier, they
are "forcing Hillary down our throats."

Yet, would I vote for Hillary should she win? It's excruciatingly hard and unpleasant
to answer "Yes," since not doing so would mean having as president a Republican,
who would be even worse, and who would lead our nation into even a quicker self-
destruction. Under these circumstances, I see no other choice than to vote against
the greater evil from happening.

Politics have always been dirty, but never as dirty as right now. Hillary would help
to maintain the status quo, and any Republican would only worsen the degree of
bribery and corruption. This has been their hallmark ever since Reagan took over
power in 1980.

Bernie is the only one who has indicated that his first priority as president is to get
at the root of the mess that is plaguing our nation. The other candidates won't
even try.

What a nice situation we are in!!

A year ago Bernie wasn't even known. I, too, knew very little about him. I

was rooting for Elizabeth. When I became sure that she wasn't running, I started
reading up on Bernie, and became impressed. His political views were very similar
to mine -- his and those of Elizabeth. For me, he was a natural to switch to.

Well, within a short time after entering the presidential race, Bernie began to make
rapid progress, very rapid indeed, for an almost total unknown. The main stream
media rarely ever mentioned a word about him. They avoided him like the
plague. And the Republicans didn't attack him either. Their reason is simple
to see. Why should they give him publicity? Making him known to more people
was the last thing on their minds. He was already dangerous enough. In fact,
they did the opposite, they tried to suppress him wherever possible. The DNC
did the same thing. Example: Just look at DWS's scheduling of the Dem. Primary
Presidential Debates.

Does this give you another point of view to really think about re why they attack
only Hillary, and not Bernie? Hillary became a known entity when she became
First Lady in 1993. Whether or not the Republicans liked it, there was nothing they
could do about it -- she has been a worldwide known figure since then. She also has
extremely heavy political baggage to tote around. Bernie does not. It would have
been quite stupid of the Republicans to give him more publicity, since his political
views are more different from theirs than Hillary's. To them he is more dangerous
than Hillary - should he win. So they kept quiet about him, and still do.

And they are right. If the Republicans had given him all the publicity by attacking
him, Bernie would have been way ahead of Hillary months ago. Just look at the
massive turnout of people whichever town he visits to make speeches. Can you
imagine what would have happened, if Bernie had been frequently seen on TV
over the past year?

The only reason Hillary is winning the Dem. Primaries is because the Dem. Establishment

people are doing their best to help her along with their crooked ways. Perhaps many of them
are in her political debt? She has had so much experience in her long political life - and a lot
of it seems to have been experience of the unpleasant negative type.

The only presidential candidate who is a decent human being and still running is Bernie. I
hope he stays in. If it hadn't been for all the dirty tricks played against him, he would have
easily been the Dem. Front Runner today.

For the above reasons I would like to see Bernie win, even if it should be only at the expense
of Hillary's coming into difficulties - brought on herself by herself - such as the result of her
present FBI investigation, or the exposure of her Goldman Sachs speech, or whatever else.

Yet, if she should win the Dem. Primaries, I would vote for her against any Republican. The
reason is simple - I'd like to help prevent still greater misery and more unnecessary deaths
for the vast majority of the American people by doing what I can to fight the greater evil.

If some find the above crazy, my answer is: These are crazy times. And that is WHAT IS
taking place right now. What else better can one do than play along with it -- until these
times change? No situation on earth is permanent. The life of our planet, itself, is only a
temporary one.

A second higher-up NYC Primary Election official has been put on leave without pay. I

thought this investigation was already over and done with. It's still going on. Maybe
this time they really mean business:

Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next »