HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Are_grits_groceries » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 154 Next »

Are_grits_groceries

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Hometown: SC
Member since: Tue Oct 7, 2008, 07:35 PM
Number of posts: 15,536

Journal Archives

Alabama Family Throws Neglected Dog a Heartwarming Goodbye Party


Family Throws Neglected Dog a Heartwarming Goodbye Party
Butch the Boston terrier struggled for most of his life, but the Buzbee family of Pinson, Alabama, made sure his final days were a wonderful treat.

According to AL.com, Butch was initially adopted by a careless owner, who tried to control the dog with a shock collar. When that failed, the owner abandoned the Boston terrier to fend for himself on the streets.
<snip>
Butch was recently discovered in someone's yard struggling to breathe. Hoping to save the dog, Alicia Buzbee and her daughter Kansas Humphrey took the sickly canine to Birmingham Boston Terrier Rescue. Unfortunately, Butch's prognosis was bleak. The dog was suffering from little lung capacity, a leaking trachea and a swollen heart. The rescue told Buzbee and Humphrey that there was little that could be done for Butch.

The mother and daughter decided to schedule a humane euthanasia for the ailing pooch, but not before giving him a final few days packed with the love and treats he deserved. For Thanksgiving, Butch was given hamburgers and pumpkin pie, toys and cuddles. Buzebee and Humphrey threw Butch a party where he spent the day enthusiastically playing with his new family and friends.

Throughout all the celebrating, Butch's new caretakers held out hope the dog would miraculously rebound. Sadly, Butch's poor condition was irreversible. On Saturday, after a week of compassionate pampering, Butch crossed the Rainbow Bridge.
<snip>
http://www.peoplepets.com/people/pets/article/0,,20878495,00.html

Good on them!
Sigh.......
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Wed Dec 3, 2014, 10:10 AM (16 replies)

Remember the 3rd man on the podium with John Carlos and Tommie Smith at the 1968 Olympics:


<snip>
He was not well known outside of Australia, though, and not much considered on the world sprinting scene. He had not medaled at a major championship going into the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City. But he was running well at those Games, and he worked his way into the final. Then a series of strange and confusing events happened ... and these would mark the rest of his life.

The first was that Norman ran the race of his life. His time -- 20.06 seconds -- was the fastest he had ever run, the fastest he ever would run, and even now, 44 years later, stands as the Australian record.
<snip>
So Carlos and Smith went to Norman and asked him if he believed in human rights. Norman said yes. They asked him if he believed in God. Norman said yes. They told him what they intended to do on the stand and how they were sure that it was the most important thing they would do at the Olympics. Norman said four words that Carlos and Smith would never forget. He said, "I'll stand with you."

Carlos and Smith went to the medal podium wearing black socks. They had intended to also wear black gloves, but Carlos had left his pair behind. Norman suggested that one wear a black glove on his right hand, the other on his left. And that's what they did. The photo of John Carlos and Tommie Smith holding up one black gloved hand has become one of the most iconic in American history, and perhaps THE most iconic in Olympic history.

Peter Norman stands to the left, an unclear look on his face. What you cannot see in the photo is that Norman was wearing a badge that read: "Olympic Project For Human Rights," which he had borrowed from Paul Hoffman, a white member of the U.S. rowing team.

"I believe that every man is born equal and should be treated that way," Norman told reporters after the ceremony.

You probably know that all hell broke loose after that. The IOC immediately suspended Carlos and Smith from the U.S. team and expelled them from the Olympic Village. The two men received much abuse when they came home -- including death threats -- and were ostracized for a long while. But, like I say, you probably knew that.

What you may not have known -- what I did not know -- was that Peter Norman also went through his own personal turmoil after Mexico City. He was vaguely reprimanded by the Australian Olympic Committee for his support of Carlos and Smith -- according to The Guardian, Australia's chef de mission, Julius Patching, told Norman: "They're screaming out for your blood, so consider yourself severely reprimanded. Now, you got any tickets for the hockey today?"

But the press was not so accommodating. It tore Norman to shreds. Back home, Norman was banned from track for a couple of years. And even after he returned, though he was by far Australia's top sprinter and one of the best in the world, they did not send him to the Olympics in Munich four years later.
<snip>
Peter Norman died in 2006. He was 64 years old. A few weeks ago, the BBC showed footage of his funeral. They showed John Carlos and Tommie Smith carrying Peter Norman's casket.
Please read the rest:
http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/36921250/the-forgotten-story-of-australian-olympian-peter-norman

John Carlos and Tommie Smith made a tremendously courageous and meaningful gesture.
Peter Norman should be remembered too.
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Tue Dec 2, 2014, 06:18 AM (60 replies)

I could have investigated the Michael Brown shooting scene better than the authorities did.

In the critical first minutes after a shooting, investigators are trained to follow a time-tested process of protecting the scene to ensure that evidence is not compromised, according to the experts and documents. A shooting suspect — even a police officer — must be cordoned off in a controlled area and stripped of his clothing, his weapon secured by investigators, and must be escorted by officers if he leaves.

“An officer driving himself back? Wrong. An officer booking his own gun into evidence? Wrong,” said David Klinger, an expert on police shootings with the University of Missouri at St. Louis who is also a former police officer. “The appropriate investigative procedures were not followed.’’
<snip>
Read the rest about how the shooting was investigated.
More:http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/seemingly-unorthodox-police-procedures-emerge-in-grand-jury-documents/2014/11/25/48152574-74e0-11e4-bd1b-03009bd3e984_story.html

Seriously. After watching crime shows, reading real-life police stories and detective novels, I could have produced better results that would be fairly accurate.
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Thu Nov 27, 2014, 05:40 AM (32 replies)

Justice Antonin Scalia Explains What Was Wrong With The Ferguson Grand Jury

Justice Antonin Scalia Explains What Was Wrong With The Ferguson Grand Jury

On Monday, Prosecutor Bob McCulloch announced that a grand jury had decided not to indict Darren Wilson, the officer who killed Michael Brown. But that decision was the result of a process that turned the purpose of a grand jury on its head.

Justice Antonin Scalia, in the 1992 Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, explained what the role of a grand jury has been for hundreds of years.
It is the grand jury’s function not ‘to enquire … upon what foundation denied,’ or otherwise to try the suspect’s defenses, but only to examine ‘upon what foundation is made’ by the prosecutor. Respublica v. Shaffer, 1 Dall. 236 (O. T. Phila. 1788); see also F. Wharton, Criminal Pleading and Practice § 360, pp. 248-249 (8th ed. 1880). As a consequence, neither in this country nor in England has the suspect under investigation by the grand jury ever been thought to have a right to testify or to have exculpatory evidence presented.

This passage was first highlighted by attorney Ian Samuel, a former clerk to Justice Scalia.

In contrast, McCulloch allowed Wilson to testify for hours before the grand jury and presented them with every scrap of exculpatory evidence available. In his press conference, McCulloch said that the grand jury did not indict because eyewitness testimony that established Wilson was acting in self-defense was contradicted by other exculpatory evidence. What McCulloch didn’t say is that he was under no obligation to present such evidence to the grand jury. The only reason one would present such evidence is to reduce the chances that the grand jury would indict Darren Wilson.
<snip>
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/11/26/3597322/justice-scalia-explains-what-was-wrong-with-the-ferguson-grand-jury/

OVER to you SCOTUS.
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Thu Nov 27, 2014, 05:28 AM (0 replies)

The Brown family has been told that the Grand Jury has reached a decision.(Confirmed)

An announcement to say a verdict has been reached will be made at 4pm. The verdict will be announced later. (Unconfirmed) This may change.

This is from ongoing tweets from reliable sources. I am sure the family has been notified.
The announcement part sounds like a hot mess. Why should it be any different than this whole ordeal and process I guess?
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:26 PM (21 replies)

The Darren Wilson Grand Jury decision is in. Will be announced later today.

@sdkstl: Now the news column is moving: @WesleyLowery: '
Solid sourcing' #DarrenWilson GJ is in. Presser later today. What will be announced TBD.

Many tweets from reliable sources about this. The time has not been announced. I am waiting on more info.

Presser later today: WaPo link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/grand-jury-reaches-decision-in-case-of-ferguson-officer/2014/11/24/de48e7e4-71d7-11e4-893f-86bd390a3340_story.html
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:40 PM (17 replies)

Just imagine getting this text from your kid:

@jbjpublisher:
Rattled tonight by text and call from daughter at #FSU while in library during shooting. Praying for all involved.


I can't even....
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Thu Nov 20, 2014, 08:13 AM (36 replies)

John Doar has passed. Remember and honor this great man!

John Doar, a country lawyer from northern Wisconsin who led the federal government’s on-the-ground efforts to dismantle segregation in the South, and who later headed the team that made the case for impeaching President Richard M. Nixon in the wake of the Watergate scandal, died on Tuesday at his home in Manhattan. He was 92. The cause was congestive heart failure, his son Robert said.

During the most volatile period of the civil rights movement in the 1960s, it was Mr. Doar, along with a federal marshal, who escorted James Meredith when he integrated the University of Mississippi in 1962. It was Mr. Doar who led the successful prosecution of the men who killed three young civil rights workers in Mississippi in 1964. And it was Mr. Doar who defused a dramatic standoff between bottle-throwing civil rights protesters and police officers with their guns drawn in Jackson, Miss.

“He was the face of the Justice Department in the South,” President Obama said in 2012 when he presented Mr. Doar with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the country’s highest civilian honor. “He was proof that the federal government was listening.”

In 1974, Mr. Doar, a Republican, was named by Democrats to be chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee investigating Watergate.

Mr. Doar prosecuted some of the most notorious cases of murder and violence in the South in the ‘60s, and was instrumental in changing the region’s pattern of race-based politics based on voter discrimination.
<snip>
Much more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/us/john-doar-federal-lawyer-in-battle-against-segregation-dies-at-92.html

RIP John Doar!
You fought the good fight. You will be missed.
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Wed Nov 12, 2014, 02:42 AM (0 replies)

Well, it feels like we all woke up in South Carolina or somewhere.

It is not a good feeling. The good news is that there is still a Democratic President who better veto the hell out of the crazy shit that crosses his desk.

Be glad if you live in a state with a good Democratic party and representation. That hopefully will provide some insulation from the lunacy.

The SC mention is a reference to realizing that those in charge of overall policy are crazy, mean, and stupid. The only thing that has kept SC from falling into the Atlantic Ocean is the fact that there is so much internecine fighting in our GOP that they rarely agree on much. This may keep the US Senate tied up for a while because Ted Cruz will probably challenge The Turtle for leadership of the Senate. We can hope.

Gonna go get another beer....or three....
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Wed Nov 5, 2014, 05:33 AM (4 replies)

For a much needed smile:



Awwww....
Posted by Are_grits_groceries | Wed Nov 5, 2014, 04:10 AM (3 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 154 Next »