HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » NYC_SKP » Journal
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

NYC_SKP

Profile Information

Name: N/A
Gender: Do not display
Hometown: The Golden State
Home country: www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&f
Current location: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1243&pid=30906
Member since: Thu May 29, 2008, 11:43 PM
Number of posts: 59,753

About Me

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12593371#post1 [div class=excerpt]http://www.democraticunderground.com/124384291 http://www.democraticunderground.com/124384554 1. It need not be unanimous. But there must be the consensus. I tend to think that if one person is strongly opposed to a lock, and is making that stand based on some principle they are able to articulate, then that position should be respected and consensus does not exist. But if some people are just-kinda-meh-not-sure opposed to a lock, then you can assume that consensus exists. But I think the bigger picture is that if everyone is doing the job in good faith and being polite to each other, then it should not be very hard to determine if consensus exists and act accordingly. http://www.democraticunderground.com/12595617 [/div] ~~~~~~ Hi Jerry!!! :thumbsup:[font color=blue][b][link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1269|Visit the new DU \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Progressive Media Resources Group\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"][/font size][/font color][/b]:thumbsup: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/121223012937-11-obama-face-1223-horizontal-gallery.jpg :thumbsup:[font color = blue][b][link:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1269|Visit the new DU \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Progressive Media Resources Group\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"][/font size][/font color][/b]:thumbsup: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/121223012937-11-obama-face-1223-horizontal-gallery.jpg

Journal Archives

God Damn It! I just listened to the recording of Trayvon screaming "Help", then the gunshot.

God DAMN it, there is no fucking way that Trayvon was an aggressor.

It's heartbreaking, his mother is on the stand and has to identify her son's voice.
You can hear him screaming and then gunfire.
Then silence.


Be warned, the 911 recording begins at about 1:00 into the clip and it is heartbreaking.



http://www.mediaite.com/tv/trayvon-martins-mother-delivers-emotional-testimony-identifies-sons-screaming-voice-on-911-call/

FUCK!

It's happening again. Every few months, like a chronic rash....

Some new excuse arises for a bitter few to rekindle old wars and open old wounds between Obama supporters and three or four other DU groups.

GD is meta. Anything goes. Shit on other democrats, call out members, do it carefully and your OP won't be hidden.

To wit:

So... how did YOU become a racist?

Elizabeth Warren: Poutrage or Hate?


It's like Junior High all over again!

I am encouraged, however, by this post: Why the fuck...


Hi, BOG!







~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear billh58, ya live in Delaware, not in Hawaii. Transparency and honesty, good things.

You have visited Maui, Oahu, and what we call the big island.

Thank you for playing, and have a nice day.

I've been there too many times without really absorbing the facts.

I am aware of the county jurisdictions, that's part of my job.

And, thank you, I always enjoy my work and doubly so in the islands!




Response to billh58 (Original post)Sat May 25, 2013, 08:37 AM
billh58 (2,637 posts)
6. Robb, I apologize

for contributing to sliming this place up, and if you want, please delete this thread. I can re-post the Hawaii gun laws now that the disrupter is gone.
Reply to this post
Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Our government should do much more, but purchasers of these garments are not without blame. (links)

It's fine to blame the government but we also could all do a bit more to try to buy American goods or at least do a little bit of research to see what brands or countries of origin to avoid.

Usually, widespread popular boycotts work faster than government reform.

http://www.dosomething.org/actnow/actionguide/compile-responsible-shopping-guide

http://www.dosomething.org/cause/62/resources

http://www.googobits.com/articles/p0-491-practical-ways-to-avoid-sweatshop-clothing.html

http://www.greenamerica.org/programs/sweatshops/whattoknow.cfm

Skinner, Calling all Second Amendment Supporters "Homophobic" and "Sexist" is fucking crazy.

.
First:

GENUINE homophobia and sexism are FAR more serious problems than to allow for this kind of Guilt by Association Bullshit.

I alerted on this offensive sig line:

'RKBA,' 'pro-2nd amendment,' and 'pro gun rights' (among other pro-NRA talking points/memes) are code words for pro-racist, pro-sexist, pro-homophobic, and pro-white supremacist views. It is that simple. Bolding suggestion by Jump Prologue (IYKWIM). Thanks!


Posting again, with emphasis:

''RKBA,' 'pro-2nd amendment,' and 'pro gun rights' are code words for pro-racist, pro-sexist, pro-homophobic, and pro-white supremacist views.


In other words, if you don't agree with me on Guns, you're a HOMOPHOBE and a RACIST.

I originally alerted with a TOS check, hopefully this will be seen as a TOS violation.

Here'a a clever post with the jury results.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=217691

I wonder if the community, especially members of diverse sexual orientations and members of color, think this is an appropriate message for a sigline.

TIA.

IMO most don't really know what a semi-automatic is, they're picturing a fully automatic machine gun

That's the problem with polls: there's no filtering for how knowledgeable respondents are about the subject.

Which makes these emotional polls and little more.

Here's another graphic from the article:



Bookmarking.

We are expecting a significant amount of traffic through election day and beyond. Elad has installed an additional front-end server but we still expect to have to disable certain forum functions once the load on our servers becomes too great. During these times it is absolutely necessary to remove these functions otherwise the servers will crash and the site will be unavailable to everyone.

In order to keep DU running during periods of extremely high traffic we have a system of levels in place. As traffic to the site increases, certain functions are removed at each level. When this happens a notification will appear on the Latest page indicating what level we're on. The effects of these levels are described below.

LEVEL 1
Advanced Search is unavailable
Latest page Milestones are not displayed
The red text that indicates a post has been edited is not displayed
Cool section is removed from the homepage

LEVEL 2
The right column is removed from the Latest page
Latest page customization options are unavailable

LEVEL 3
Some navigational images are not displayed
Posts counts are not displayed
Signature lines are not displayed
Stars are not displayed
Avatars are not displayed
The homepage is replaced with a static HTML file

LEVEL 4
The discussion forum is available to registered members only

LEVEL 5
The discussion forum is available to Star Members only


A word of warning: there is a strong possibility that -- at least for certain periods of time -- we will have to operate at Level 5 on election night. To prepare for this possibility you can purchase a Star Membership here if you have not done so already.

Please understand that under extreme circumstances these measures do become necessary in order to keep the site running for as long as possible, for as many people as possible. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

EarlG, Skinner, Elad
DU Administrators

Easy to believe. There are 18 successful suicides by veterans per day. I know one of them.

Per day.

Eighteen.

Successful, not attempted, suicides.



A Veteranís Death, the Nationís Shame

April 14, 2012
Nicholas D. Kristof

HEREíS a window into a tragedy within the American military: For every soldier killed on the battlefield this year, about 25 veterans are dying by their own hands.


An American soldier dies every day and a half, on average, in Iraq or Afghanistan. Veterans kill themselves at a rate of one every 80 minutes. More than 6,500 veteran suicides are logged every year ó more than the total number of soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq combined since those wars began.

These unnoticed killing fields are places like New Middletown, Ohio, where Cheryl DeBow raised two sons, Michael and Ryan Yurchison, and saw them depart for Iraq. Michael, then 22, signed up soon after the 9/11 attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/15/opinion/sunday/kristof-a-veterans-death-the-nations-shame.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


...

Squeee?

My new friend from two plus weeks ago, free dog from a family I met at a flea market that cared enough to find a home for her.

Fierce and awesome, we have not picked a name. Probable a Westie/Silky mix...




It is what it is: a better commercial model probably lacking the soul of the original DU.

Original Subject Line: ATTN: Skinner and EarlG who will, no doubt, compose a thoughtful response.










Visitors to the Meta-discussion forum will have noticed a lot of discussion concerning access by former DU2 moderators to their moderator forum.

This is no secret to anyone who continued to visit both forums, something which is possible to this very day.

There are, however, details about the process of moderation and the access that mods might have had to member information that can ONLY BE ADDRESSED by the administrators.

The reasons for this are:

A: The moderator confidentiality agreement posted here and pasted below prevents any of us from discussing anything that MIGHT go a long way toward calming nerves and restoring confidence.

B: Moderators were not insiders, we don't know what the admins think, and in the end they own the site and are the ones who should answer to any concerns of the membership.

In closing, I sincerely hope that the administrators will find time to do their best to answer any and all concerns, especially as they relate membership information privacy and to the transition time between DU2 and DU3, and the access that moderators were provided until yesterday, and why.

Because we can't explain it without breaking the rules we've agreed to abide by, in perpetuity.

Thanks to Call Me Wesley for finding what I believe is the most recent form of the agreement.

Moderator Confidentiality Agreement

Updated August 26, 2005

If you wish to serve as a moderator on Democratic Underground, you are required to complete, sign and return this form. To do so, please print this page, complete the information sought below, and carefully read the Moderator Confidentiality Agreement language set forth below. You must affirmatively acknowledge your understanding of and agreement to abide by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. All of the requested information is REQUIRED. A failure to accurately provide all of the requested information or to abide by the terms and conditions of the Moderator Confidentiality Agreement will result in your request to serve as a moderator being refused by the Democratic Underground.

Forum Username: ___________________________________________________

Real Name, including Middle Initial: ___________________________________________________

Current Home Address: ___________________________________________________

City, State, and Zip Code: ___________________________________________________

Home Telephone Number: ___________________________________________________

Cell Phone Number: ___________________________________________________

Facsimile Number: ___________________________________________________

Email Address: ___________________________________________________


Moderator Confidentiality Agreement: As a moderator, you will have access to privileged and confidential information and data of the Democratic Underground and Forum users that is otherwise unavailable to regular members of the Democratic Underground or third parties. Such privileged and confidential information includes, but is not limited to: registration information provided by visitors to the Democratic Underground website, such as real names, email addresses, hometown, etc.; substantive discussions in the private Moderator Forum; records of behavior, deleted posts, locked threads, and posting habits of visitors to the Democratic Underground; alerts or other correspondence/communications with moderators and administrators; and information about the operation of Democratic Underground and how the Forum is moderated and administered.

By executing this Moderator Agreement, you agree to abide by the terms and conditions set forth herein and further warrant and represent that you shall not, either while serving as moderator or after you have discontinued serving as a moderator: 1) save or use any such privileged and confidential information for any purpose, except as may be reasonable and necessary to fulfill your specific duties as a Democratic Underground moderator; 2) use such privileged or confidential information for your own gain or benefit, personal or business; 3) sell, share, transfer or disclose such privileged and confidential information to/with any third party, except those currently serving as authorized moderators in the Democratic Underground Moderator Forum.

In the event you breach any of the terms of this Agreement, you shall be permanently banned from participating in the Democratic Underground. Furthermore, by executing this Agreement, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless Democratic Underground, its officers, directors and employees from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, judgments, monetary damages, injuries to persons or property, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, incurred by Democratic Underground and which arise out of or which are related to your breach or violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In the event Democratic Underground is forced to initiate litigation against you to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement and prevails in such action, you shall be responsible for reimbursement of Democratic Underground's reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees and court costs.

I hereby acknowledge that I have read and reviewed the terms and conditions of this Moderator Confidentiality Agreement and that I understand and agree to be bound by the same.


Signature: _______________________________________ Date: __________

Return form to: Democratic Underground
P.O. Box 339
Kensington, MD 20895-0339



~~Peace~~

Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »