HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » luckyleftyme2 » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


Profile Information

Member since: Tue Feb 14, 2006, 11:40 PM
Number of posts: 3,801

Journal Archives

does our governor represent you?

I grew up in a republican house hold. yup you might say that I was a typical paper town son who
grew up in a mill-town whose family knew which side the bread was buttered on. I stayed with that tunneled visioned outlook till I was about 30. Then I went to a meeting to voice my opinion on who I thought would make a good candidate for a state congressman in my district. well we were told that we could speak out freely and come to a consensus! hmmm but the jerk the party sent down didn't like our choice so he ridiculed us and said we had to vote for this candidate he favored. Well never one to not speak his piece "I said I was under the impression we were to decide among ourselves who we liked and bring it to a vote" -his reply was that holy group (not in those exact words) from Augusta wanted us to pick their choice! hmmm I said so that's how democracy works in Augusta. I said I think I am an independent thinker and will decide who I should vote for " and from now on I shall never waste my time in any such farce as this where the powers to be send someone like you to steer the vote. THEIR WERE ABOUT 50 PEOPLE IN THIS GATHERING AND APPROX 25 LEFT WITH ME!
Do you think the governor has the right to hold back bond money that the majority of voters approved? If you do your probably a republican and the reason we are such a poor state. Negative thinking destroys more than it ever achieves! If you have an idea doesn't mean you have the right to destroy mine. If I like yours I 'LL PUSH IT ! BUT IF THE MAJORITY VOTE FOR ANOTHER IDEA EVEN THOUGH I DON'T LIKE IT-I WILL HONOR THEIR VOTE! THIS COUNTRY WAS BUILT ON MAJORITY RULES!
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Mon May 11, 2015, 09:50 AM (14 replies)

take the time to read this

what few Mainers take the time to read:
When Maine Values LLC, a company controlled by Donald Sussman, first agreed in 2012 to invest in MTM, the stated intention was to ensure the company survived and continued its role in the community. Sussman invested more than $13 million to expand the Portland newsroom, hire a marketing team, build a digital development team and upgrade every underlying system that supports the organization. MTM has increased circulation and enabled a web paywall strategy.
In addition to the broader industry challenges all newspapers are facing, two major challenges particular to MTM have impeded its path forward: outstanding debt inherited when Maine Values LLC acquired the papers; and the cost of printing the papers on expensive, aging presses. The sale to MTM Acquisition Inc. resolves the balance sheet problem — all proceeds from the sale will go to pay the debt, with the bank receiving the vast majority of the proceeds to retire its loan; and addresses the production challenge by putting the company in the hands of an experienced commercial printer and newspaper operator.
In an era when newspapers are being aggregated by national companies and private investment firms, an important criterion in selecting a new owner for MTM was a devotion to the community, common values, a sense of civic responsibility and a passion for producing a best-in-class newspaper. Among the offers Sussman considered were ones from out of state, and ones offering a larger purchase price. He decided to sell the company to MTM Acquisitions Inc. to keep the company in Maine and because “Reade respects what we have built and appreciates the responsibility of being the steward of our newspaper brands,” according to the notification letter sent to the MTM team.
you see opposite to those narrow minded spoon fed gossip eaters it took someone with money to save our maine newspaper.
Brower, who has lived in Maine for more than 35 years, has continuously invested in Maine media properties — most recently VStv, the new local cable news channel that debuted in January. For his comments on the acquisition, see his column linked below and on the op-ed pages of the April 30 edition of the Courier Publications LLC papers.
like so few in this state I had a job where I traveled all over this state for a living when I was younger. tv at that time was poor and usually snowy. radio was am and the only thing you could count on was wheeling west virginia after 10pm in the northern counties. not only did I deliver the portland paper when I was a boy but I read it daily most of my life. I wish the new owners the best (and I don't care if your republican or democrat ) I hope you carry on and prosper! Because we Mainers need your service !
Like · Comment · Share

6 mins · Like

Joe Mac all proceeds from the sale will go to pay the debt, with the bank receiving the vast majority of the proceeds to retire its loan; and addresses the production challenge by putting the company in the hands of an experienced commercial printer and newspaper operator.
5 mins · Like

3 mins · Like
Joe Mac

Write a comment...
how many times have we heard the trash talkers on the right attack "MR Sussman" simply to for political gain. how about the lip service from the gov. for one.
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Fri May 1, 2015, 09:19 AM (0 replies)

this is for the snooper

I am writing this for the snooper who will read my post and run back to his friends in the right wing forum: as you know the portland papers are being sold. As you read this if your a democrat you will enjoy it. If your in that little right wing forum you may be to tunneled visioned to get the message.

" The Pingree Propaganda Herald
The Pingree Propaganda Herald (PPH) raised their price from $1.00 for the worthless bird carpet (except the comics) to $1.50. It may be only $0.50 but it is a 50% increase in costs. Just another reason to not support the Marxist propaganda arm."

the person that wrote this is unaware that the new owner already has a far right wing paper as well as several others. perhaps he is like the majority that I have met to lazy to do his own research.
you can be assured he will know about this post and I will once again say every time you open your mouth you bury your foot in it.
(the right has been buying up media at a rapid rate this past decade-all forms radio,tv, newspapers etc.)
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Wed Apr 29, 2015, 04:28 PM (0 replies)

the cry for war

how many times have we heard "Chuck Todd" ,and other news commentators
question ,prod and push the call for boots on the ground in Syria? In Iraq in AFGHANISTAN? REALLY? REALLY REALLY!! How many lives have been lost on both sides because of stupid people buying into false information 13 years ago? How many wmd's did we find in Iraq? Lets remember the news makers pushed and prodded till sanity was overtaken by hysteria and even then people were reluctant. And the famous family member said "congress just give me the right to go to war and I promise we will not use it!" How we bury this little tidbit from being remembered is alarming.
Will we never learn? conflict and war as a way of life for a country leads only to its early demise. Surely history has proven this. All the great warrior nations in world history have ended up financially unable to maintain their armies! to protect their borders, to protect their citizens!
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Mon Mar 16, 2015, 07:08 AM (3 replies)

some info about the heritage fdn

I located this looking for funding information for americans for prosperity:

you can find this in google: (but lately I see where they can edit some info=loose it)

MOLLY BALLSEP 25 2013, 7:00 AM ET

President Reagan and Heritage founder Ed Feulner (right) at the Heritage Foundation's 10th anniversary gala in 1983. (Heritage Foundation)
During the 1980 election, an up-and-coming Washington think tank called the Heritage Foundation undertook a massive task: to examine the federal government from top to bottom and produce a detailed, practical conservative policy vision.

The result, called Mandate for Leadership, epitomized the intellectual ambition of the then-rising conservative movement. Its 20 volumes, totaling more than 3,000 pages, included such proposals as income-tax cuts, inner-city “enterprise zones,” a presidential line-item veto, and a new Air Force bomber.

Despite the publication's academic prose and mind-boggling level of detail, it caused a sensation. A condensed version -- still more than 1,000 pages -- became a paperback bestseller in Washington. The newly elected Ronald Reagan passed out copies at his first Cabinet meeting, and it quickly became his administration’s blueprint. By the end of Reagan’s first year in office, 60 percent of the Mandate’s 2,000 ideas were being implemented, and the Republican Party’s status as a hotbed of intellectual energy was ratified. It was a Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who would declare in 1981, “Of a sudden, the GOP has become a party of ideas.”

The story of the conservative movement that has come to dominate the Republican Party over the last four decades is inextricably intertwined with the story of the Heritage Foundation. In that time, it became more than just another think tank. It came to occupy a place of special privilege—a quasi-official arm of GOP administrations and Congresses; a sponsor of scholarship and supplier of legislation; a policy base for the party when out of power. Heritage has shaped American public policy in major ways, from Reagan’s missile-defense initiative to Clinton’s welfare reform: Both originated as Heritage proposals. So, too, did the idea of a universal health-care system based on a mandate that individuals buy insurance. Though Heritage subsequently abandoned it, the individual mandate famously became the basis of health-care reforms proposed by Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama.

"They're destroying the reputation and credibility of the Heritage Foundation. The respect for their policy work has been greatly diminished."
These days, Heritage has a different crusade. The foundation’s president, the confrontational former Senator Jim DeMint, spent the last month touring the country, drawing cheering crowds as he demanded that Republican politicians insist that Obamacare be defunded—and denouncing those who wouldn’t go along. “Republicans are afraid,” DeMint told NPR. “And if they are, they need to be replaced.” The foundation’s three-year-old activism arm, Heritage Action, spent half a million dollars on online ads targeting 100 Republican House members who didn’t sign on to the defund crusade (“Tell Representative Tom Cole to Stop Funding Obamacare”).

The push from Heritage helped the defund scheme gather momentum, forcing Republican leaders to pull their proposed funding bill and replace it with one the Senate has committed to block. The resulting confrontation may force a government shutdown. Republicans who once worked out legislative language with the help of Heritage's distinguished Ph.D.s felt whiplash seeing the group cheerlead for collapse. Heritage was supposed to be above politics, they grumbled. Heritage was supposed to be about serious ideas, not tactical fights. White papers, not political campaigns—and certainly not campaigns against Republicans.

Mickey Edwards, one of three founding trustees of the Heritage Foundation when it began in 1973, was one of those disturbed by Heritage's turn, which, he told me, “makes it look like just another hack Tea Party kind of group.”
A former eight-term Republican congressman from Oklahoma, Edwards now serves as vice president of the Aspen Institute. “They’re destroying the reputation and credibility of the Heritage Foundation," he added. "I think the respect for their work has been greatly diminished as a result.”

The defund push is only the latest in a series of recent political battles Heritage has undertaken—crusades against Republican politicians that have led to a rash of complaints. Representative Renee Ellmers called them “bullies.” Representative Lynn Westmoreland said the think tank had “lost credibility with the people that were most supportive of them.” Senator Tom Coburn accused Heritage Action of “destroying the Republican Party.”
Behind the scenes, GOP staffers complained that the organization they once looked to for intellectual ammunition had become a thorn in their side. Brian Walsh’s first Washington internship was with Heritage in 1996. He rose in Republican politics to serve as communications director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. In a scathing op-ed for U.S. News headlined “Conservatives Eat Their Own for Profit,” Walsh accused Heritage of taking extreme stands to generate fundraising dollars. “In our great democracy, you affect public policy by offering a vision, influencing a majority of public opinion and winning elections, not by burning down the House, attacking your allies, and falling on your sword,” he wrote.
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Sun Mar 1, 2015, 08:45 PM (1 replies)

what you may not know(keystone pipeline)

I came across this and thought it worth forwarding:
2015-01-30 / Commentary

Print article Print
Keystone about much more than Kerpen tells us
Phil Kerpen in his article published in the Times Record on January 7, recommends that the United States approve the Keystone XL pipeline. Kerpen is President of American Commitment, an organization dedicated to “Free Markets, Economic Growth, Limited Government, Property Rights, and Individual Freedom” according to its website. There are many statements in this article which are highly questionable. Kerpen’s claim that the pipeline would create 40,000 jobs appears to be a gross exaggeration. The Times Record editorial on January 22 puts the number of jobs at 5,000 temporary jobs and only 40 permanent ones, hardly enough given all the risks of a Keystone XL pipeline.

Kerpen’s claim that the principal opponent of the pipeline is San Francisco billionaire Tom Steyer is totally false. In June of 2011, twelve hundred people came to Washington, D.C. to protest the pipeline in the largest act of civil disobedience in the North American climate movement, followed by 40,000 people who stood outside the White House in 2013 protesting Keystone. Gus Speth, former dean of Yale’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, has thrown his lot with those getting arrested to protest the Keystone Pipeline. In addition there are millions of people opposed to building the pipeline for reasons Kerpen failed to mention. Ranchers and indigenous people who live along the proposed pipeline path have campaigned together against the pipeline that would threaten their water supplies. Water supplies along the proposed route of the pipeline are all interconnected. Spills from the pipeline could contaminate an enormous expanse of water needed for drinking and irrigation of the nation’s breadbasket, not to dismiss salmon runs and valued fly fishing streams.

Where's the story?
PointsMentioned Map8 Points Mentioned
Perhaps the biggest reason not to build Keystone is that the planned route is through the Ogallala Aquifer, a vast source of fresh water beneath the Great Plains that provides drinking water to approximately two million people. We cannot put this huge source of fresh water at risk. But Kerpen doesn’t tell us this. He may not even know about it.

He doesn’t tell us that the tar sands oil the Keystone XL pipeline would carry have emissions of CO2 that are 12 percent higher than from conventional oil. He doesn’t tell us about the scourge on the landscape the tar sands extractions have made in Alberta, where the Trans Canada oil company has torn down boreal forests to extract tar sands oil, leaving huge tailing ponds covering nearly 70 square miles. These ponds have now been found to leak toxic liquid into nearby water systems. He doesn’t tell us about the broken treaties with indigenous people in Alberta who can no longer fish in their streams. The lawsuits brought by indigenous people in Canada and the U.S., some of which have been successful, may be out greatest hope to forestall this attack on our land. Indigenous people, however, have few resources to go up against “Big Oil.” For a more complete understanding of this debate I heartily recommend Naomi Klein’s most recent book, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate.

Kerpen doesn’t tell us that a part of the Keystone pipeline system known as Keystone 1 is already built and had fourteen leaks in the United States in its first year of operation. Tar sands oil is thought to cause more erosion of pipelines than traditional oil. We have only to look at yesterday’s newspaper to read about truckloads of water being brought into the town of Glendive, Montana following a leak in an oil pipeline that poisoned the water supply in the Yellowstone River with 50,000 gallons of oil, or more.

Another error in Kerpen’s article is that Keystone would provide “more secure access to North American energy.” All the tar sands oil in Keystone would be carried to refineries in Texas and exported from there to other countries and would add nothing to the U.S. supply of oil.

As to Kerpen’s attack on Tom Steyer, shouldn’t we applaud a man who once promoted and made his fortune on fossil fuels for “seeing the light” and becoming a proponent of “green energy”? The forces against green energy are fierce, but unless we listen to what 97 percent of environmental scientists are telling us and do something about our reliance on fossil fuels now, we will not have a livable planet. Let us hope that Obama will not listen to false prophets like Phil Kerpen and will acquire the knowledge and courage that will lead him to veto the Keystone XL pipeline.


Sarah J. Slagle-Arnold is a clinical psychologist. She lives in Topsham.
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Mon Feb 2, 2015, 07:54 AM (17 replies)

old age

As I listened to the news last night and heard the general muzzle loading season ended and the bow season (special) will end next sat. I realized this was the first year I never hunted since I was 10. From the age of 10 -11 I was allowed to go with my dad but not carry a weapon. At the age of 12 I shot my first deer with a 20 gauge bolt action shot gun. I can remember that in 1948 the radio was saying a week before hunting season that we may not be allowed to hunt because of forest fire danger. I also remember the night before season opened I tossed and turned most of the night.
strange how you mellow out over the years. The last few years I hunted I bet I passed up on
20 does even though I Had a permit.
I still may go rabbit hunting with my son and grandson a few times this winter; but I'll let them do the shooting. I'll just enjoy the outdoors.
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Sun Dec 7, 2014, 09:32 AM (3 replies)


We’ll start with the standard definition of a Red state.

At PolitiFact Rhode Island, we recognize that whether a state is Red or Blue can be a matter for debate. Our state is considered to be among the bluest of the Blue, yet it has had Democratic governors in only 20 of the last 50 years. Nonetheless, the color is typically defined by how a state votes in the presidential elections, so we're going to classify states by how they voted in the 2012 Obama-Romney race.

It should be noted that there are different ways to measure poverty. Occupy Democrats says its claim is based on per-person income. We looked at that, along with median household income and median family income.

By all three measures, 9 out of the 10 poorest states voted Republican in the last presidential election. (In fact, they voted Red in the last four elections.)

According to the latest Census data, 9 of the 10 states with the lowest per-person income levels were Red: Mississippi, Arkansas, Idaho, West Virginia, Kentucky, Utah, Alabama, South Carolina and Oklahoma.

The Census data also show that 9 of the 10 states with the lowest median household income were Red: Mississippi, Arkansas, West Virginia, Kentucky, Alabama, Tennessee, Louisiana, South Carolina and Oklahoma.

And 9 of the 10 states with the lowest median family income were Red: Mississippi, Arkansas, West Virginia, Kentucky, Alabama, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana and South Carolina.

The only Blue state on each list: New Mexico.

By the way, 9 of the 10 states with the highest per-person income voted Blue in the 2012 presidential race: Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, New Jersey, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Virginia and Washington. The only Red state on the list: Alaska.

Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Thu Sep 4, 2014, 10:22 AM (1 replies)

so much for right wing political ads

HARTFORD--Economic growth in New England has been slowest in Connecticut and Maine since the end of the recession in 2009, according to new federal statistics released Wednesday.
Quarterly gross domestic product - the value of all goods and services - from 2005 to 2013 was released by the U.S. Commerce Department, which said the statistics will provide a "more complete picture of economic growth" in each state.
From the second quarter of 2009 until the end of 2013, the economies of Connecticut, the region's second largest, and Maine grew by 3 percent.
In contrast, Massachusetts' economy, the largest in New England, expanded by 11 percent, to $424.4 billion from mid-2009 to 2013.
hot air and despair is all the right has in its pocket!
Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Tue Sep 2, 2014, 08:04 AM (3 replies)

how wrong is the right

I can't help think of this ole ditty when I see the heritage groups failures at trying to prove wrong is right:
here's the ditty: "there's just no justice in this here land I just got a divorce from my ole man!
I laughed and laughed at the court's dissension they gave the kids to him

Dick Polman
Back in the distant days of yore — circa 2013 — Republicans viewed Obamacare as the meatiest, juiciest issue of the 2014 campaign season, the political equivalent of a Porterhouse steak. But alas, the issue has since shrunk to a sprig of parsley.

You rarely hear Republicans railing wildly anymore about an imminent “train wreck,” because the law they hate is doing what they feared most: It’s working.

Where's the story?
PointsMentioned Map6 Points Mentioned
Obamacare is expanding health coverage to ever-growing millions of Americans, notably in red states like North Carolina, Arkansas and Kentucky. Since March, it has exceeded enrollment projections, a landslide majority of Americans (including self-identified Republicans) tell pollsters that they’re happy with their new coverage, and most premium hikes this year are expected to be modest — foiling GOP doomsday warnings about skyrocketing rates.

And so, having hurled themselves headlong into the wall of factual reality, Republican strategists are beating a swift retreat. It’s all detailed in the new ad-tracking stats compiled by the nonpartisan Campaign Media Analysis Group, which details dramatic anti-Obamacare ad pullbacks in North Carolina, Louisiana and Arkansas.

It may be sheer coincidence, but the ad pullback in North Carolina comes at a time of rapid enrollment in North Carolina — nearly 600,000 people by early spring, which, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, is roughly 54 percent of the potential statewide market. And it may be sheer coincidence, but the ad pullback in Arkansas comes at a time of rapid enrollment in Arkansas; indeed, the rate of uninsured citizens in that state has reportedly fallen from 22.5 percent last year to 12.4 percent at the midpoint this year.

The GOP’s ad retreat dovetails with congressional stats that document the GOP’s rhetorical retreat. According to the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, GOP lawmakers referenced Obamacare 2,753 times in floor speeches last September. But this past June, with Congress in session for roughly the same number of days, GOP lawmakers were virtually mute. The number of references: 171.

It’s a beautiful thing for the public, to be spared so much of their bilge.

And they’ve been wrong about Obamacare so many times, it’s comical. They said there’d be “death panels.” Wrong. John Boehner said we’d face “Armageddon.” Wrong. They said the federal website couldn’t be fixed, that it would “collapse on itself.” Wrong. They said that few Americans would bother to sign up. Wrong. They said that few healthy young Americans, in particular, would bother to sign up. Wrong. They said that those Americans who were forced to change health plans would hate their new coverage. Wrong. They said Obamacare would train-wreck federal spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office, that’s wrong too. They said that premiums this year would go through the roof...yeah, let’s talk about that one.

Back in June, the right-wing Daily Caller website warned in a headline that, thanks to Obamacare, Americans would face “Double-Digit Premium Hikes.” The Daily Caller cited a bid by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield to seek an average 12.5 percent premium increase in the Connecticut market. (By the way, health insurers have sought big hikes since time immemorial.) But now we have the result. Two days ago, after Connecticut insurance regulators said no to that hefty hike, Anthem agreed to lower the average premium by 0.1 percent.

How come? Because Obamacare has empowered federal and state regulators to thwart health insurers’ attempts to gouge customers. In an email, a Kaiser Family Foundation official told Talking Points Memo, “Premium increases for exchange plans have been modest in most places...But even the increases we’ve heard about generally represent proposed rates that may not be the last word, once state regulators finalize their reviews.”

The moral of this story: Watch not what Republicans say about Obamacare (their Cassandra ‘tude has long been a crock), but what they do about Obamacare. Which is squat. Heck, they still can’t even agree on what they’d replace it with. And their decision this summer to yank most of their campaign advertising speaks volumes.

Posted by luckyleftyme2 | Sun Aug 31, 2014, 06:35 PM (0 replies)
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »