HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » WhaTHellsgoingonhere » Journal
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Dec 22, 2005, 09:00 AM
Number of posts: 2,935

Journal Archives

They've demonized "income redistribution" like they have with so many...

words.

Dumb America only hears "I can win the lottery, too" when income is redistributed to the wealthy, and "socialism" and "class warfare" when money goes the other direction.

For some reason, Dems let them win all the marketing wars. Remember when Dems were too afraid to say "Liberal"?
Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Sun Dec 15, 2013, 11:52 AM (0 replies)

Great find, kpete, thanks!

Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:15 PM (0 replies)

nice post bvar!

Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Sat Dec 14, 2013, 12:14 PM (0 replies)

Bravo! That's exactly what's been taking place for 30 years

Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Fri Dec 13, 2013, 09:32 AM (0 replies)

Finally letting us know what her platform will look like...

"Striking a soothing note on the global financial crisis, she told the audience, in effect: We all got into this mess together, and we’re all going to have to work together to get out of it. What the bankers heard her to say was just what they would hope for from a prospective presidential candidate: Beating up the finance industry isn’t going to improve the economy—it needs to stop. And indeed Goldman’s Jim O’Neill, the laconic Brit who heads the bank’s asset management division, introduced Clinton by saying how courageous she was for speaking at the bank. (Brave, perhaps, but also well-compensated: Clinton’s minimum fee for paid remarks is $200,000)."

Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:36 PM (1 replies)

What would Hillary do...?



"My view, and the view of many, is that trade agreements are more of a foreign policy tool than an economic policy tool. Presidents and their State Departments want alliances with countries, and use trade agreements as part of the diplomacy, tying us together. The problem is that we lose so many industries as we “bribe” those countries by way of giving them access to our domestic market without receiving similar volumes of foreign sales.

<snip>

Thus… Clinton’s and Obama’s strategy is fatally flawed, because (1) the TPP will likely worsen our trade deficit or at least it won’t help and (2) the fact of our trade deficit means we can’t be a substantial foreign investor (because we are a net recipient of foreign investment)."

http://economyincrisis.org/content/hillary-clinton-wants-u-s-investment-in-asia


Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Thu Dec 12, 2013, 12:11 PM (2 replies)

Wow, no one even saw this...???

I know Obama, the media, the multi-national corporatists want TPP talks to be secret and the treaty fast tracked and all, but DU whiffed on it?

OBAMACARE!!!!

Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Tue Nov 26, 2013, 01:30 AM (0 replies)

I can only think of 3 people in Congress that carry themselves like candidates...

...and by "carry" I mean they make populist statements:

Bernie Sanders (says "not interested" every week on Thom Hartmann)
Elizabeth Warren (apparently, she's thrown her support behind Hillary)
Alan Grayson (I could see him running)

Outside the beltway
Howard Dean
Dennis John Kucinich
Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Thu Oct 31, 2013, 10:00 PM (1 replies)

and 2000 DU heads explode...

Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Thu Oct 31, 2013, 02:45 AM (0 replies)

everytime I see footage of the thugs pushing riot police...

...at the White House, I can't help but think about how riot police pepper spray or beat the living crap out of peaceful demonstrators from the left.
Posted by WhaTHellsgoingonhere | Tue Oct 15, 2013, 12:38 AM (18 replies)
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next »