Member since: Thu Dec 30, 2004, 05:48 PM
Number of posts: 6,080
Number of posts: 6,080
Posted by Land Shark | Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:23 PM (67 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:35 PM (5 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Fri Apr 1, 2016, 11:18 PM (30 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Mon Mar 21, 2016, 12:15 PM (10 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:55 PM (50 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Tue Mar 15, 2016, 02:06 PM (3 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:48 PM (5 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Tue Mar 1, 2016, 11:14 PM (21 replies)
How Establishment Repubs LOSE popular vote, LOSE electoral college, & STILL WIN THE PRESIDENCY, 2016
The Constitution does not provide that the appointment of electors shall be by popular vote, nor that the electors shall be voted for upon a general ticket, nor that the majority of those who exercise the elective franchise can alone choose the electors. It recognizes that the people act through their representatives in the legislature, and leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method of effecting the object.
So if a Republican third party candidate can get one or more electoral votes, and there is no majority winner in the electoral college, the currently Republican House (not currently expected to change) would decide who is the next President on a one state/one vote basis. And the problem is, as the link above points out, that if states like Pennsylvania had been awarded on a congressional district basis, Romney would have won Pennsylvania as well as a majority of the congressional districts in Michigan.
Establishment Republicans don't need to win the popular vote, or even the electoral college, in order to install a President opposed by the vast majority of the American people. All they need is to divide up the electoral college, and have 26 states that, after the coming elections, have a majority of their congressional districts electing republicans. They can let the other 24 be 100% blue, for these purposes, and it won't change anything about the Presidency.
This could even mean that the Dems regain control of the House but STILL CAN'T STOP establishment republicans from installing their favored candidate.
1. Ya think the Republicans will run a third party candidate for President?
2. Ya think the Republicans, with the Supreme Court now also on the line, will STOP TRYING TO CHANGE electoral college rules, given they tried last time?
3. Ya think the Republicans control enough state legislatures to cram through electoral college changes before November to give a Republican third party candidate at least one electoral college vote, and make it difficult or impossible for anyone else to get a clear majority of the electoral college, so the Presidency is decided by the 12th amendment and the House of Representatives?
4. Ya think Republicans would obstruct the presidential process like they've obstructed the Supreme Court process?
5. Ya think Republicans hope that a Supreme Court vacancy will drive up turnout enough to make it unnecessary to pull out the knife and change the electoral college in some states?
Yeah, I think so, too.
Now, let's see if Trump wins tonight. And then we shall see the Constitution pitted against the will of the People by the Republicans. Again.
Posted by Land Shark | Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:54 PM (17 replies)
Posted by Land Shark | Wed Oct 10, 2012, 11:21 AM (197 replies)