Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

Hissyspit's Journal
Hissyspit's Journal
September 6, 2013

Pentagon Is Ordered to Expand Potential Targets in Syria With a Focus on Forces

Source: New York Times

Pentagon Is Ordered to Expand Potential Targets in Syria With a Focus on Forces

By DAVID E. SANGER and ERIC SCHMITT
Published: September 5, 2013

WASHINGTON — President Obama has directed the Pentagon to develop an expanded list of potential targets in Syria in response to intelligence suggesting that the government of President Bashar al-Assad has been moving troops and equipment used to employ chemical weapons while Congress debates whether to authorize military force.

Mr. Obama, officials said, is now determined to put more emphasis on the “degrade” part of what the administration has said is the goal of a military strike against Syria — to “deter and degrade” Mr. Assad’s ability to use chemical weapons. That means expanding beyond the 50 or so major sites that were part of the original target list developed with French forces before Mr. Obama delayed action on Saturday to seek Congressional approval of his plan.

For the first time, the administration is talking about using American and French aircraft to conduct strikes on specific targets, in addition to ship-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles. There is a renewed push to get other NATO forces involved.

The strikes would be aimed not at the chemical stockpiles themselves — risking a potential catastrophe — but rather the military units that have stored and prepared the chemical weapons and carried the attacks against Syrian rebels, as well as the headquarters overseeing the effort, and the rockets and artillery that have launched the attacks, military officials said Thursday.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/world/middleeast/pentagon-is-ordered-to-expand-potential-targets-in-syria-with-a-focus-on-forces.html

September 5, 2013

Poll: Majority Of Americans Approve Of Sending Congress To Syria

http://www.theonion.com/articles/poll-majority-of-americans-approve-of-sending-cong,33752

Poll: Majority Of Americans Approve Of Sending Congress To Syria

EWS • Syria • News • ISSUE 49•36 • Sep 5, 2013

WASHINGTON—As President Obama continues to push for a plan of limited military intervention in Syria, a new poll of Americans has found that though the nation remains wary over the prospect of becoming involved in another Middle Eastern war, the vast majority of U.S. citizens strongly approve of sending Congress to Syria.

The New York Times/CBS News poll showed that though just 1 in 4 Americans believe that the United States has a responsibility to intervene in the Syrian conflict, more than 90 percent of the public is convinced that putting all 535 representatives of the United States Congress on the ground in Syria—including Senate pro tempore Patrick Leahy, House Speaker John Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and, in fact, all current members of the House and Senate—is the best course of action at this time.

“I believe it is in the best interest of the United States, and the global community as a whole, to move forward with the deployment of all U.S. congressional leaders to Syria immediately,” respondent Carol Abare, 50, said in the nationwide telephone survey, echoing the thoughts of an estimated 9 in 10 Americans who said they “strongly support” any plan of action that involves putting the U.S. House and Senate on the ground in the war-torn Middle Eastern state. “With violence intensifying every day, now is absolutely the right moment—the perfect moment, really—for the United States to send our legislators to the region.”

“In fact, my preference would have been for Congress to be deployed months ago,” she added.

Citing overwhelming support from the international community—including that of the Arab League, Turkey, and France, as well as Great Britain, Iraq, Iran, Russia, Japan, Mexico, China, and Canada, all of whom are reported to be unilaterally in favor of sending the U.S. Congress to Syria—the majority of survey respondents said they believe the United States should refocus its entire approach to Syria’s civil war on the ground deployment of U.S. senators and representatives, regardless of whether the Assad regime used chemical weapons or not.

MORE[p]
September 4, 2013

Breaking: U.S. Senate Panel passes Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Syria

Source: Reuters

@Reuters: RT @ReutersPolitics: U.S. Senate panel passes authorization for use of military force in Syria by 10-7 vote http://t.co/GZdxouDEVf

Senate Panel Authorizes Limited Military Strike in Syria

By Kathleen Hunter and Laura Litvan
September 04, 2013 3:30 PM EDT

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to authorize President Barack Obama to conduct a limited U.S. military operation in Syria, the first step toward congressional endorsement of the effort.

The resolution, approved 10-7, supports use of force in a “limited and specified manner against legitimate military targets” during a 60-day period following enactment, with a possible 30-day extension at Obama’s request. The resolution doesn’t authorize use of U.S. ground troops in combat.

Senators voting against the measure were Democrats Tom Udall of New Mexico and Chris Murphy of Connecticut, and Republicans James Risch of Idaho, Marco Rubio of Florida, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and John Barrasso of Wyoming. Senator Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, voted “present.”

The committee vote clears the way for consideration by the full Senate. Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said that will begin Sept. 9 when Congress officially reconvenes after a five-week break.

Read more: http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-04/senate-panel-authorizes-limited-military-strike-in-syria.html

September 4, 2013

AG: Govt Won't Enforce Same-Sex Veterans Law

Source: Associated Press

AG: GOVT WON'T ENFORCE SAME-SEX VETERANS LAW

Sep. 4 3:10 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration says it will stop enforcing a law that blocks benefits to partners of military veterans in same-sex marriages.

In a letter to congressional leaders, Attorney General Eric Holder says that a provision in federal law on benefits to veterans and their families defines "spouse" to mean a person of the opposite sex. He says that definition leaves out legally married same-sex couples, and runs afoul of a Supreme Court ruling last June.

The court declared unconstitutional a provision in the Defense of Marriage Act restricting the words marriage and spouse to apply only to heterosexual unions. Holder says that like the Defense of Marriage Act, the provision in the veterans benefits law has the effect of placing lawfully married same-sex couples in a second-tier marriage.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ag-govt-wont-enforce-same-sex-veterans-law

September 4, 2013

Chelsea Manning Seeks Presidential Pardon

Source: Associated Press

CHELSEA MANNING SEEKS PRESIDENTIAL PARDON

By DAVID DISHNEAU
— Sep. 4 8:58 AM EDT

HAGERSTOWN, Md. (AP) — Army Pvt. Chelsea Manning is seeking a presidential pardon for leaking reams of classified information that her lawyer says did not merit protection.

The Pvt. Manning Support Network released documents Wednesday that defense attorney David Coombs filed a day earlier with the U.S. Justice Department and the Department of the Army.

Manning, previously known as Bradley Manning, has declared her desire to live as a woman while serving a 35-year prison sentence at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

In her petition for pardon and commutation of sentence, Manning writes: "The decisions I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in."

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/chelsea-manning-seeks-presidential-pardon

September 3, 2013

Egypt Shuts Down Four TV Stations (Including Al Jazeera Egypt)

Source: BBC News

Egyptian court orders closure of four TV channels, including Al-Jazeera Egypt and a Muslim Brotherhood station

More to follow.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23941208

September 3, 2013

Russia Says Ballistic 'Objects' Fired in Mediterranean (No Report of Strikes)

Source: Reuters

@Reuters: Ballistic objects detected by Russia fell into sea: RIA http://t.co/oUClR1Gviy

@AP: Russian reports say 2 missiles fired in the Mediterranean; no reports of strikes: http://t.co/QDAnVlrqkr

m.twitter.com/AP

@BreakingNews: Russian defense ministry says it has detected 2 ballistic objects fired toward eastern Mediterranean - RIA via @Reuters, @RT_com

Russia says ballistic 'objects' fired in Mediterranean

Tue Sep 3, 2013 5:05am EDT

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian radar detected two ballistic "objects" that were fired towards the eastern Mediterranean from the central part of the sea on Tuesday, state-run news agency RIA quoted the Defense Ministry as saying.

The Defense Ministry declined immediate comment to Reuters. A ministry official had earlier criticized the United States for deploying warships in the Mediterranean close to Syria.

(Writing by Steve Gutterman, Editing by Timothy Heritage)

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE9820AC20130903

September 3, 2013

McClatchy: To Some, U.S. Case for Syrian Gas Attack and Need For Strike Has Too Many Holes

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/09/02/201027/to-some-us-case-for-syrian-gas.html#emlnl=Daily_News_Update

Posted on Monday, September 2, 2013

To some, US case for Syrian gas attack and need for strike has too many holes

By Hannah Allam and Mark Seibel | McClatchy Washington Bureau

- snip -

The case Secretary of State John Kerry laid out last Friday contained claims that were disputed by the United Nations, inconsistent in some details with British and French intelligence reports or lacking sufficient transparency for international chemical weapons experts to accept at face value.

After the false weapons claims preceding the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, the threshold for evidence to support intervention is exceedingly high. And while there’s little dispute that a chemical agent was used in an Aug. 21 attack outside of Damascus – and probably on a smaller scale before that – there are calls from many quarters for independent, scientific evidence to support the U.S. narrative that the Assad regime used sarin gas in an operation that killed 1,429 people, including more than 400 children.
Some of the U.S. points in question:

- The Obama administration dismissed the value of a U.N. inspection team’s work by saying that the investigators arrived too late for the findings to be credible and wouldn’t provide any information the United State didn’t already have.

- U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq countered that it was “rare” for such an investigation to begin within such a short time and said that “the passage of such few days does not affect the opportunities to collect valuable samples,” according to the U.N.’s website. For example, Haq added, sarin can be detected in biomedical samples for months after its use.

MORE[p]
September 3, 2013

McClatchy: To Some, U.S. Case for Syrian Gas Attack and Need For Strike Has Too Many Holes

Source: McClatchy Newspapers

Posted on Monday, September 2, 2013

To some, US case for Syrian gas attack and need for strike has too many holes

By Hannah Allam and Mark Seibel | McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s public case for attacking Syria is riddled with inconsistencies and hinges mainly on circumstantial evidence, undermining U.S. efforts this week to build support at home and abroad for a punitive strike against Bashar Assad’s regime.

- snip -

After the false weapons claims preceding the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, the threshold for evidence to support intervention is exceedingly high. And while there’s little dispute that a chemical agent was used in an Aug. 21 attack outside of Damascus – and probably on a smaller scale before that – there are calls from many quarters for independent, scientific evidence to support the U.S. narrative that the Assad regime used sarin gas in an operation that killed 1,429 people, including more than 400 children.

Some of the U.S. points in question:

- The Obama administration dismissed the value of a U.N. inspection team’s work by saying that the investigators arrived too late for the findings to be credible and wouldn’t provide any information the United State didn’t already have.

- U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq countered that it was “rare” for such an investigation to begin within such a short time and said that “the passage of such few days does not affect the opportunities to collect valuable samples,” according to the U.N.’s website. For example, Haq added, sarin can be detected in biomedical samples for months after its use.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/09/02/201027/to-some-us-case-for-syrian-gas.html#emlnl=Daily_News_Update

Profile Information

Member since: Fri Nov 12, 2004, 08:39 AM
Number of posts: 45,788
Latest Discussions»Hissyspit's Journal