HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » deminks » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

deminks

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Oct 28, 2004, 11:20 AM
Number of posts: 8,155

Journal Archives

‘Stop excusing him’: Elijah Cummings derails CNN interview for ‘ridiculous’ Trump double standard

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/stop-excusing-him-elijah-cummings-derails-cnn-interview-for-ridiculous-trump-double-standard/

(snip)


CNN’s Cuomo countered that Democrats were “bashing” Trump instead of promoting Clinton’s policies.

“Especially when it comes to this latest wrinkle, this gift that you guys say he gave you about asking Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails to release them,” the CNN host charged. “You guys are calling it treason. He went on TV this morning and said, ‘I was being sarcastic. This is the Democrats trying to frame me as a bad guy.'”

“We have to stop excusing him when he says these nasty things,” Cummings interrupted. “We really do. Because words do matter.”

“But is it treason?” Cuomo pressed.

“I’ll let the FBI and others decide that,” the Maryland Democrat remarked. “My point is — and by the way, no matter what it is, it should not have been said. If I did that, I’d be out of office or in jail.”

(end snip)



Two men conducted a 9/11/01 'dry run' in 1999 with tickets from Saudi government

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/07/declassified-report-saudi-ties-september-11

After being kept out of the public eye for 13 years, Congress on Friday declassified 28 pages of a controversial report outlining a series of potential connections between the terrorist hijackers who attacked the United States on 9/11 and the government of Saudi Arabia. The document details a number of alleged instances wherein individuals linked to the Al Saud family may have assisted or provided financial support to the al Qaeda operatives who committed the terrorist attacks.

(snip)

Two men conducted a “dry run” on a flight to D.C., with tickets paid for by the Saudi government

In 1999, Mohammed al-Qudhaeein and Hamdan al-Shalawi reportedly asked flight attendants a handful of suspicious questions and tried to enter the cockpit of the airplane twice. Al-Qudhaeein and al-Shalawi were flying to Washington, D.C., where they planned to attend a party at the Saudi Embassy. The two claimed the embassy also paid for their tickets aboard the flight.

(end snip)



http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/287947-congress-publishes-redacted-28-pages-from-9-11-report

(snip)

And in one instance that appeared notable in retrospect, two men flying on tickets paid for by the Saudi embassy in 1999 acted suspicious during the flight and twice tried to enter the cockpit. Charges were not filed in that instance even though the plane was forced to make an emergency landing, but the FBI’s field office in Phoenix believed the incident may have been a “dry run” to test airline security.

(end snip)

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/read-28-declassified-pages-about-potential-saudi-involvement-911

Another frightening passage described what seemed to be a dry run or information-gathering mission for the eventual hijackings. 1999, Saudi citizens Mohammed al-Qudhaeein and Hamdan al-Shalawi flew from Phoenix to Washington, DC to attend a party at the Saudi embassy. After the plane departed, they asked flight attendants suspicious technical questions about the flight. Qudhaeein twice attempted to enter the cockpit, and the plane made an emergency landing. The two men claimed the flight was paid for by the Saudi Embassy. The FBI investigated the incident and ultimately decided not to pursue a prosecution, but did uncover that both men had "connections to terrorism."

(end snip)

Who could have imagined?

Just What Were Donald Trump's Ties to the Mob?

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/donald-trump-2016-mob-organized-crime-213910?o=0

In his signature book, The Art of the Deal, Donald Trump boasted that when he wanted to build a casino in Atlantic City, he persuaded the state attorney general to limit the investigation of his background to six months. Most potential owners were scrutinized for more than a year. Trump argued that he was “clean as a whistle”—young enough that he hadn’t had time to get into any sort of trouble. He got the sped-up background check, and eventually got the casino license.

But Trump was not clean as a whistle. Beginning three years earlier, he’d hired mobbed-up firms to erect Trump Tower and his Trump Plaza apartment building in Manhattan, including buying ostensibly overpriced concrete from a company controlled by mafia chieftains Anthony “Fat Tony” Salerno and Paul Castellano. That story eventually came out in a federal investigation, which also concluded that in a construction industry saturated with mob influence, the Trump Plaza apartment building most likely benefited from connections to racketeering. Trump also failed to disclose that he was under investigation by a grand jury directed by the U.S. attorney in Brooklyn, who wanted to learn how Trump obtained an option to buy the Penn Central railroad yards on the West Side of Manhattan.

(snip)

No other candidate for the White House this year has anything close to Trump’s record of repeated social and business dealings with mobsters, swindlers, and other crooks. Professor Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian, said the closest historical example would be President Warren G. Harding and Teapot Dome, a bribery and bid-rigging scandal in which the interior secretary went to prison. But even that has a key difference: Harding’s associates were corrupt but otherwise legitimate businessmen, not mobsters and drug dealers.

(snip)

“Why’d Donald do it?” Barrett said when I put the question to him. “Because he saw these mob guys as pathways to money, and Donald is all about money.”

(end snip)



On a dark desert highway, cool wind in my hair...



Desperado



One Of Alan Rickman’s Final Recordings Was This Video To Help Refugees

http://elitedaily.com/news/politics/alan-rickman-final-recordings-help-refugees/1348456/



Planned Parenthood Smear Videos Caused 9 Times More Threats

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/02/planned-parenthood-vids-sparked-threats.html#

The Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooting was a shock but, sadly, not a surprise.

In the past four months, at least four separate groups have warned that the undercover video campaign from the Center for Medical Progress (CMP), which alleged that Planned Parenthood illegally profited from its fetal tissue donation program, could result in an escalation of violence against abortion providers.

In a July 31 application (PDF) for an injunction against CMP founder David Daleiden and his organization, the National Abortion Federation (NAF) noted that there were already telling warning signs of anti-abortion violence, just 17 days after the release of the first undercover video. In addition to relaying death threats received by Planned Parenthood doctors, the NAF noted that their security staff had received “an increase in ‘off’ hour requests for security advice from its members” and that they had advised abortion providers to “be on heightened alert.”

Most immediately concerning, however, was the NAF’s claim that “incidents of harassment at Planned Parenthood facilities increased nine fold in July, compared to reported incidents in June, and the reported incidents of harassment were even more numerous in August.”

(snip)

Law enforcement was also concerned about an increased risk of violence following the release of the CMP videos. In September, CBS reported that an FBI Intelligence Assessment warned that “it is likely criminal or suspicious incidents will continue to be directed against reproductive health care providers, their staff, and facilities.” The document further noted that a recent uptick in criminal or suspicious incidents following the CMP videos was “consistent with the actions of lone offenders using tactics of arsons and threats all of which are typical of the pro-life extremist movement.” One of the nine incidents they listed was in Denver.

(snip)

Either way, one of the most frightening things about Dear is just how many people seem to have seen him coming from so far away.

(end snip)

So, Congress continues to push the videos, and the MEdia continues to talk about them as if they are unedited, knowing for months that the effect they have is dangerous. But, that was the plan, wasn't it? Terra Terra Terra gets gopers elected.

News from Brownbackistan - Shock and Awe

We woke up to quite a surprise in Brownbackistan this morning. If the tyrant Sam has intervened for his bro (law 'enforcement' acts like he has), it may be a new day here.

http://www.salina.com/news/state/brownback-s-brother/article_87456b5d-e975-5191-9767-4d93696c930f.html

PARKER — Fields lined with crops and pastures dotted with livestock surround a trigger-happy bully who brags about a political cloak of invincibility keeping him beyond reach of the law in faithfully conservative Linn County.

Adversaries say he’s woven a liquor-infused tapestry of fear. The conflict features drive-by gunfire, death threats, explosions, stalking, trespassing, cattle theft and more. Descriptions offered by neighbors converge to reveal a potentially lethal menace. So far, their nemesis has found no reason to relent.

Not when your name is Jim Brownback and you’re a brother to Sam, the most powerful politician in Kansas.

Parker farmer Ben Katzer, who lives near Jim Brownback, said the governor’s younger sibling didn’t hesitate to rub salt in wounds inflicted on others by boasting, “Nobody can touch me.

(snip)

Incidents were punctuated by sporadic gunfire and colored by explosions from Jim Brownback’s farm that met the definition of shock-and-awe. Brownback packed Tannerite in jars and detonated the mixture with high-velocity rounds. He ignored an investigator’s suggestion to knock it off.

“It’s legal,” Jim Brownback said. “It’s legal.”

(end snip)

Right after all the confederate flags are removed, this should be next.

Congressional Democrats to Introduce Ambitious New Bill to Restore the Voting Rights Act

http://www.thenation.com/article/210673/congressional-democrats-introduce-ambitious-new-bill-restore-voting-rights-act?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow#

Two years ago, on June 25, 2013, in Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court invalidated the centerpiece of the Voting Rights Act. Tomorrow, congressional Democrats will introduce an ambitious new bill that would restore the important voting-rights protections the Supreme Court struck down. The Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2015 would compel states with a well-documented history of recent voting discrimination to clear future voting changes with the federal government, require federal approval for voter ID laws, and outlaw new efforts to suppress the growing minority vote.

The legislation will be formally introduced tomorrow by Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and leaders of the Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, and Asian Pacific American Caucus in the House. Civil-rights icon Representative John Lewis will be a co-sponsor. The bill is much stronger than the Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2014 (VRAA), Congress’s initial response to the Supreme Court’s decision, which garnered bipartisan support in the House but was not embraced by the congressional Republican leadership, which declined to schedule a hearing, let alone a vote, on the bill.

“The previous bill we did in a way to try and get bipartisan support—which we did,” Senator Leahy told me. “We had the Republican majority leader of the House promise us that if we kept it like that it would come up for a vote. It never did. We made compromises to get support and they didn’t keep their word. So this time I decided to listen to the voters who had their right to vote blocked, and they asked for strong legislation that fully restores the protections of the VRA.”

(end snip)

You right wing f*cks wanna show how racism is dead, then get on board fixing what you admittedly broke.

Media Executives Are Salivating Over Big Money Flooding the 2016 Election Cycle

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/22/one-group-americans-drool-wall-wall-presidential-campaign-ads-next-year-media-companies/

At least one small slice of the American public looks forward to the non-stop, sleazy political advertisements set to inundate viewers during the 2016 elections: media executives and their investors.

Peter Liguori, the chief executive of Tribune Company, said earlier this month that the next presidential campaign presents “enormous opportunity” for advertising sales. Speaking at a conference hosted by J.P. Morgan Chase, Liguori, whose company owns television stations, referenced Super PAC spending as a key factor for why he thinks Tribune Co. political advertising revenue will rocket from $115 million in 2012 to about $200 million for the 2016 campaign cycle.

(snip)

In 2012, Les Moonves, president and chief executive of CBS, memorably said, “Super PACs may be bad for America, but they’re very good for CBS.”

His views appear unchanged. In a February investor call, Moonves predicted “strong growth with the help of political spending,” particularly on television. He added dryly, “looking ahead, the 2016 presidential election is right around the corner and, thank God, the rancor has already begun.”

(snip)

In spite of declining television advertising revenue expected this year, credit rating agencies recently gave broadcast companies a sunny two-year outlook. The reason, Carl Salas, Moody’s senior credit officer, told the Los Angeles Times, is that political ad spending is expected to boom next year thanks in large part to the Citizens United decision. “Political advertising revenue defies gravity,” Salas remarked.

(end snip)

The clown car raises money for the MEdia in the end, and the more the merrier.

Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »