Member since: Thu Jul 29, 2004, 02:51 PM
Number of posts: 426
Number of posts: 426
From her 1/26/16 newsletter:
Hearing for summary judgment at 1:30 on Feb 18 at the Sedgwick County Courthouse
A motion for summary judgement has been filed by the plaintiff on my lawsuit. If granted, this would destroy my chances of getting access to the paper records.It would be a loss before I even have a chance to present my case in a trial.
My lawyer tells me it is a public hearing, so I can use your support. By being there to support me, you will let the judge know I am not alone. The citizens of Sedgwick county support my request to verify the accuracy of the voting machine paper records.
For those of you with the ability to be there, thank you very much for your support.
These quotes from a post by Cory Doctorow provide background on Beth Clarkson:
"Wichita State University's Beth Clarkson (who is also chief statistician
of WSU's National Institute for Aviation Research) discovered "odd
patterns" in Kansas electoral voting records, so she requested public
docs to help her get to the bottom of things -- requests that state
officials ignored, dodged, and stalled.
Clarkson's analysis of results from November 2014's election indicated
that some machines had been "sabotaged," so she requested the suspect
machines' paper-audit tapes (which do not record how each voter voted,
merely timestamped votes with associated metadata); the election
officials of Sedgwick County told her she'd have to sue them to gain
access to them."
Posted by sketchy | Sun Jan 31, 2016, 11:36 PM (0 replies)
Posted on Legal Schnauzer blog:
"Will Joseph Siegelman's lawsuit against Justice Department produce evidence that officials admitted to wrongdoing in prosecution of his father?"
From the article:
"Joseph Siegelman, an attorney with The Cochran Firm in Birmingham, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) seeking documents about the prosecution of his father, former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman. The new lawsuit suggests certain DOJ officials have admitted to misconduct during the course of the Siegelman investigation and trial.
Siegelman associates have been seeking documents about the case, especially regarding the supposed recusal of then U.S. Attorney Leura Canary, for roughly 10 years. Alabaster attorney John Aaron filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in 2006 and followed up with a lawsuit in 2009. Aaron learned that more than 1,000 documents exist related to the Canary recusal, but the government has refused to turn them over.
Joseph Siegelman filed a FOIA request last year with the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), but the request was denied. Joseph Siegelman now has filed a lawsuit, which appears to go well beyond the Canary-recusal issue. (Please see full lawsuit at the end of this post.) From a report at WAFF in Huntsville:
The son of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman is suing the Office of Professional Responsibility, a branch of the United States Department of Justice. Siegelman is serving a federal sentence for bribery and conspiracy at Oakdale Prison in Louisiana.
Siegelman’s son, Joseph Siegelman, is suing for records obtained during the Office of Professional Responsibility’s, or OPR’s, investigation into Siegelman’s prosecution and conviction. The OPR investigates Department of Justice attorneys accused of professional misconduct.
The filing states that the OPR opened an investigation after multiple national media outlets reported on the Siegelman case and raised questions about the prosecution. These outlets reported prosecutors placed undue pressure on witnesses, communicated with the jury, communicated privately with the judge, and withheld evidence from the defense."
more at the link...
Posted by sketchy | Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:26 PM (10 replies)
from the APWU website:
From the article:
12/07/2015 - The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced today that it would seek to stop the proposed merger of Staples and Office Depot, the nation’s largest and second-largest office-supply chains. The agency filed an “administrative complaint” charging that Staples’ proposed $6.3 billion takeover of Office Depot would violate the nation’s anti-trust laws by “significantly reducing competition nationwide.”
APWU President Mark Dimondstein praised the decision. “This is an important victory for consumers and businesses against Staples’ unbridled greed and its dangerous corporate agenda,” he said. “It is a big step toward stopping the merger.”The APWU has been an outspoken critic of the buyout.
“Our union conducted two studies showing the negative impact the proposed merger would have on consumers and businesses. It was clear that a merger of these two companies would have left just one national office-supply superstore chain. This would inevitably force customers to pay higher prices and leave them with fewer choices.”
The FTC voted 4-0 to issue the complaint and to authorize its staff to seek a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction in federal court to prevent the two companies from consummating the merger and to maintain the status quo pending a hearing on the matter. The administrative trial is scheduled to begin on May 10, 2016.
I'm so glad to see this development!
Posted by sketchy | Tue Dec 8, 2015, 06:57 PM (2 replies)
KSAL Staff - November 12, 2015 4:14 pm. From a Salina, Kansas radio station.
from the article:
"Statistician Beth Clarkson has been in the news about her efforts to audit Sedgwick County voting machine tapes from the 2014 election. She presented a series of questionable statistical voting patterns linked with electronic voting machines at today’s K-State Salina Polytechnic’s Civic Luncheon.
Of concern, both Sedgwick County and Saline County use the same type of direct record electronic (DRE) voting machines that statisticians are finding problematic. They see a correlation between the kind of voting machine used and the percentage of Republicans in those precincts voting.
As a baseline, when paper ballots are counted, the percentage of both Republicans and Democrats who vote is the same, regardless of precinct size. In a graph, this appears as a flat horizontal line. With the Diebold and Sequoia brands of electronic voting systems used predominantly in Kansas, Clarkson sees:
• In very small precincts, which are often rural, a very high percentage of Republicans voting. (This is expected.)
• As precinct size increases, the percentage of Republicans voting decreases significantly for small (but not very small) precincts.
• Then, the trend shifts. In medium and large precincts, the percentage of Republicans who vote shows incremental increases with size and “never reaches a mean” (or comes to a flat line).
• Clarkson also included results for other brands of electronic voting machines that showed increases in the percentage of Democrats voting as precinct size increased. Any voting system that didn’t produce a straight line gives cause for auditing.
While New Mexico, New York and Wisconsin gain high markets for verifying their vote counts, Kansas—like most of the country—has an inadequate voting verification system. (New Mexico uses ballots that are scanned; after the election, these ballots are re-scanned to verify results.)"
More at the link, including a quote from Clarkson that she feels, after reviewing data from the 2004 presidential race in Ohio, that John Kerry should have won the 2004 election.
Posted by sketchy | Tue Nov 17, 2015, 12:55 PM (4 replies)
Beth's request from the newsletter:
"I need your help for a letter writing campaign.
A RFP (request for proposal) for a new voting system for Sedgwick, Shawnee, Johnson and Wyandotte counties was issued in October.
I have some major concerns with it about the lack of crucial requirements for transparency in vote counting. I've enumerated them in this post http://showmethevotes.org/2015/11/01/minimum-requirements-for-a-new-voting-system/ at showmethevotes.org along with my arguments for why these requirements are necessary.
If you agree that we need a system that will guarantee our votes are counted accurately with verifiable transparency, then please write:
Chief Deputy Election Commissioner,
Sedgwick County Election Office
525 N. Main, #101
Wichita, KS 67203
Please let her know you support me in wanting those minimum requirements included in our new voting system. She has promised to forward our concerns to the committee that will be deciding on the new voting system.
Posted by sketchy | Sun Nov 1, 2015, 07:19 PM (1 replies)
Thursday, October 22nd, 2015, by Associated Press
WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — The top election official in Kansas was dismissed as a defendant from the lawsuit filed by a Wichita mathematician seeking voting machine tapes after finding statistical anomalies in election counts. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach said in a statement Thursday he was pleased but not surprised. The move leaves Sedgwick County Elections Commissioner Tabitha Lehman, whose office actually has the tapes, as the only defendant in the case. Wichita State University statistician Beth Clarkson wants the tapes to do a statistical model by checking the error rate on electronic voting machines used at a Sedgwick County voting station during the November 2014 general election. Kobach says the law is clear regarding auditing procedures and contends he should have never been a party to the lawsuit in the first place.
link to second article:
Kobach dismissed from statistician’s lawsuit
By Zoe Brown Published: October 22, 2015
TOPEKA (KSNT) — Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach has been officially dismissed from a lawsuit filed by Wichita statistician Elizabeth Clarkson.
Clarkson was requesting access to ballots in order to audit election results.
A release from Kobach’s office says he was pleased, but not surprised, with the dismissal. Kobach stated, “The letter of the law is clear regarding the auditing procedures of election ballots; we were dismissed as a party to this lawsuit because we should have never been a party in the first place.” He said the Secretary of State’s Office did not have custody of the ballots and did not have the authority to direct others to give Clarkson access.
Kobach also believes that, if the courts interpret the ballot custody statutes correctly, Clarkson’s access to the ballots will be denied again.
Kobach believes that "if the courts interpret the ballot custody statutes correctly, Clarkson's access to the ballots will be denied again."
His arrogance is breathtaking.
Posted by sketchy | Sat Oct 24, 2015, 08:12 PM (0 replies)
from Beth Clarkson's newsletter:
Discovery Hearing October 19th, 2015
Judge Douglas Roth held the discovery hearing at 11:00 this morning. This was a short and somewhat informal hearing.
Kris Kobach was officially dropped as a defendant and had no representation present for that reason.
The following dates were agreed to:
Discovery Cut-off: Dec. 31, 2015
Pre-trial Conference: Jan 14, 2016, 1:30 pm
Dispositive Motion Deadline: Jan 27, 2016
Bench Trial Mar 22, 2016 9:00 am
Afterward, my attorney and I were interviewed immediately afterwards for KSN news. http://ksnt.com/2015/10/19/voting-machine-lawsuit-moves-ahead/
Posted by sketchy | Mon Oct 19, 2015, 08:44 PM (2 replies)
WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — The lawsuit filed by a Wichita mathematician seeking voting machine tapes after finding statistical anomalies in election counts is set to go to trial early next year. A scheduling order issued Monday sets a one-day bench trial for March 22 to hear the open records case brought by Wichita State University statistician Beth Clarkson. Sedgwick County Judge Douglas Roth also set deadlines for motions and scheduled a January 14 pretrial conference. Clarkson wants the tapes to do a statistical model by checking the error rate on electronic voting machines used at a Sedgwick County voting station during the November 2014 general election. Top election officials for Kansas and Sedgwick County want the court to block the release of tapes, arguing they are not subject to the open records act.
Read more: http://kansaspublicradio.org/kpr-news/headlines-monday-october-19-2015
Glad to see this!
Posted by sketchy | Mon Oct 19, 2015, 07:13 PM (6 replies)
from Beth Clarkson's 10/14/15 newsletter:
Show Me The Votes Foundation is open.
I've now got a non-profit foundation set up to take donations together with a gofundme site. https://www.gofundme.com/showmethevotes
I appreciate all the correspondence and interest I've generated with my quest for data here in Wichita. With your help to handle the inevitable legal expenses, I know I'll succeed.
Many Thanks to Paul Klusman, a master of the art of Internet Cat Videos, for being kind enough to put together the video. I also want to thank Eileen Jones for setting up the site. I don't know when I've have managed that.
Dr. Bob Scott, retired WSU prof and independent businessman and Denney Clements, http://www.amazon.com/Bleeding-Kansas-2-0-Denney-Clements-ebook/dp/B00MJDCJK0/ref=sr_1_1_twi_kin_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1444870503&sr=8-1&keywords=Denney+Clements semi-retired writer and editor have agreed to serve on my board of directors for the Show Me The Votes Foundation. In addition to covering expenses, I hope to have enough donations to be able to arrange to pay my employer for my time spent on this going forward. Bob and Denney will make sure the money goes towards this project and not to my bank account.
Looking forward to tomorrow, date of the discovery hearing!
Posted by sketchy | Sun Oct 18, 2015, 03:21 PM (3 replies)
From the editorial by Steve Haynes, president and publisher, Nor’West Newspapers, Oberlin:
"It’s hard to understand why state officials, especially Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who worries so much about voter fraud, are making it so difficult for a Wichita State University researcher to check the accuracy of Kansas voting machines.
Statistician Beth Clarkson says voting results seem to show a pattern, an “anomaly,” that could indicate the results are not accurate or have been manipulated. She wants to audit the results, and so far has filed two lawsuits to get access to voting records.
Maybe she’s wrong. Maybe there’s nothing to worry about. But when a legitimate expert says there could be a problem with votes being manipulated, don’t voters deserve a full-scale check?
So far, Kobach and county election officials have stonewalled Ms. Clarkson, saying two state laws make it illegal to give her what she wants."
More at the link:
Looking forward to the Oct. 19th discovery hearing that's coming up.
Posted by sketchy | Thu Oct 1, 2015, 11:14 AM (3 replies)