HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Warren DeMontague » Journal

Profile Information

Name: Darren MorWandtague
Gender: Male
Hometown: This un
Member since: Thu May 20, 2004, 05:02 AM
Number of posts: 46,387

About Me

Make my funk the P-Funk.

Journal Archives

Page: 1

Warren DeMontague

RSS RSS [All]
Warren DeMontague's ProfileSend mail to Warren DeMontague

Because women are programmed by the Matriarchy™ to reduce men to a humming tube full of "C" Cells!!!

It's HORRIBLE, the reductio-gynocentric female gaze phallo-objectiflisnatzhartz which women with their evil womany woman ways turn all that is wonderful about a man into a plastic doo-dad that they can blithely and emotionlessly toss into the nightstand drawer. Sniff!

At least the MEN, the poor victimized matriarchy-abused men, who are still holding on to a shred of their dignity under the weight of the female oppressor, still cry out for a sliver of the humanity their fem overlords have denied them, by purchasing (or, I suppose, renting....yuk) a full body animatronic substitute-- of their cruel oppressionatrix!

Not the women, no, no, not the women. With their emotionless casual lack of regard for all that is good and decent, they can turn a man into a battery operated orgasm dispenser, and nothing more. And when those batteries are dead, what do they often do? THEY THROW THEM OUT, THAT'S WHAT.

They probably don't even use rechargeables. Sigh.

Yes, Yes. I blame the Matriarchy.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Apr 27, 2012, 04:30 AM (0 replies)

It's everywhere you have authoritarian control freaks telling consenting adults what to do.

And it is certainly worst where fundamentalists rule.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Mon Apr 23, 2012, 08:54 PM (0 replies)

Some people seem to believe a lot of idiotic shit.

Some people seem to believe that stay at home parents are lazy dropouts who do nothing except encourage consumption and chauffeur rug rats to unnecessary lessons, when the little monsters should be raising themselves unsupervised, as they did in the good old days.


remdi95 niyad
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Apr 17, 2012, 07:44 PM (3 replies)

The fact that you've trotted out this list as, presumably, slamdunk examples of "bashing", says alot

In reality, the vast majority of them are no such thing. A couple are over the line, Smokey, but really.. most of them aren't and if you're trying to establish some pattern of widespread persecution, I don't think you've made your case.

And furthermore you've sort of shot it in the foot, much as this same tired argument (sorry, "call for respect") often shoots itself in the foot, in several key ways which I will elaborate upon as I break down your examples.

  • First, I'd like to posit a ground floor axiom for the purposes of this post, and that is, if expressions of skepticism are bigoted, then so are expressions of belief. "God is Pretend" is no more or less bigoted than "Jesus loves you". "I believe in God" is no more or less bigoted than "I don't believe in God, I don't believe in your god", etc. etc. etc. I will refer to this Axiomatic assertion, herewith, via this sequence of symbols: !A!

  • The second axiom I'd like to propose is the assertion that there is NO relative, objective measure by which one can distinguish "reasonable" or "logical" religious beliefs from any other kind. So if questioning Jesus's resurrection is off limits, then so is questioning the existence of the God Quetzlcoatl, the assertion that there is literally a Mt. Olympus upon which resides Zeus and the fellow stars of his metaphysical reality drama, the assertion that the Earth is only 4,000 years old, etc. I will refer to this axiom by this: !B!

  • For instances of Special Pleading, I will use this indicator: !C! I'm going to hope, by now, we all have an idea of what special pleading is- often, in these arguments, we see !C! combined with !A! but particularly with !B!.



    1) You do NOT get to make the name of your own superstition mean "good person" because doing so screams that those who do not share it are bad people - and all the disingenuous BS in the world will not change that loathsome lie.

    And the problem is? You've never heard anyone try to claim that "Christian"="Good Person" (and, conversely, clearly bad people who call themselves "Christians" aren't Real Christians because, again, they're "bad people"?) MT, are you saying it's NOT a "loathsome lie" to assert that only believers in one religion or another are the "good people"? Shit, I think it's a VERY loathsome lie. Or perhaps the problem with this quote is just the one, word, "superstition". If that's a problem, I would refer it back to both !A! and !B!


    2) I think "Christians" are probably the most harmful entities on this planet right now. No single group has caused more bloodshed and harm to the living beings on this planet.

    Whether or not this assertion could be backed up with statistics, facts, data, or whatever, it's still bashing. On that, we agree. Over the line.

    3) I don't bash individual Christians. I bash the idea of Christianity which very much does need to be bashed. With a few exceptions, that's what I see the majority of athiests on DU doing. If it bothers you so that your religion is being bashed, and you take that as a personal affront from all athiests on DU, perhaps your belief is not nearly as strong as you thought.

    This one, too, is over the top.

    4) Christianity can be used to justify many different and contradictory conclusions which makes it pretty much worthless as any kind of standard to live up to.

    The first part is a fairly obvious piece of observation that can be applied to just about any belief system. The second is subjective opinion. I think this post points up a weakness in logical framing of arguments, but I wouldn't file it under bashing. Maybe just poor reasoning, or debate skills.

    5) I am convinced that religious belief is delusional at best, and a variety of mental illness at worst. Folks displaying those characteristics are hard to support for leadership positions outside the asylum.

    Another example of subjective opinion. Note the use of "I am convinced". Were I to make this sort of statement, I might qualify the 2nd part as well with an "I believe" just to reiterate that point, but this person is stating their opinion. They are entitled to their opinion.

    6) I don't even believe he <God>exists, but instead is a made up myth used by groups over the centuries to control people and politics. If that makes me a god-hater I will wear that badge proudly.

    A clear example of !A!

    7) I believe everyone has a right to believe in anything they want. I also believe people have a right to say they think those beliefs are dangerous, absurd or ridiculous.

    I'm really scratching my head as to what could possibly be the fucking problem with this line. For all I know, I wrote it. It sounds like something I would say.

    8) Get your religion out of my government or get another Religion.

    This is a political sentiment, not a religious one, nor is it bashing of religion nor is it bashing of Christianity.

    9) Want Your Ideas Respected, Sir? Get Better Ideas....

    Okay, I think we all know who wrote that. Another statement I find extremely hard to find fault with.

    10) Religious people want their ridiculous beliefs placed off limits. Why? Too embarrassing to have to defend them?

    And, again, what is the alternative, then? NO beliefs may be criticized, ever, or analyzed or even made fun of, because they're someone's special religious belief? The Rapture guy who keeps getting the date wrong? The Westboro Baptists? Frank Chu? Where does it end? ....This one hits all 3: !A!,!B!,and !C!.

    11) I ridicule the ridiculous. I care little who or how many decided to make it the central focus of their life.

    Presumably, you think that people should NOT ridicule the ridiculous, or what they consider ridiculous, which really means no one should ridicule anything, because everything is probably ridiculous to someone and not ridiculous to someone else. !A! and !C!





    You should have stuck with #2 and maybe #3. The rest of your examples only serve to torpedo your argument, not fortify it.







  • Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Apr 10, 2012, 05:36 AM (1 replies)

    I don't "feel" superior, I *am* superior, Jack.

    Anyway, you've made it perfectly clear that this isn't about a cogent objection to anything in the cartoon (remember... Your OP?) but rather a vigorous exercise in you grinding whatever axe it is that's not sharp enough to get the bees out of your Ostara/Ishtar bonnet.

    (how's that for a mixed metaphor?)

    I'm not interested in helping you further in that endeavor.

    As for the Tao, work it out yourself. Or don't. The Bible tries to pass off illogical, contradictory nonsense as genuine wisdom, the Tao passes off genuine widom as illogical, contradictory nonsense. The Bible resents ridicule, the Tao DEMANDS it. Which is why its jokes are better.

    Chew on that.
    Posted by Warren DeMontague | Sun Apr 8, 2012, 08:20 PM (1 replies)
    Go to Page: 1