HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Warren DeMontague » Journal
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »

Warren DeMontague

Profile Information

Name: Rumdrinkin DeMonattea
Gender: Male
Hometown: This un
Member since: Thu May 20, 2004, 05:02 AM
Number of posts: 55,911

About Me

What do you call a man with 10 rabbits in his ***?

Journal Archives

Right. He's supposed to be just some random dude with an assault weapon.

Classic.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Wed Dec 26, 2012, 10:08 PM (0 replies)

I dont care who says it, its offensive. It is offensive to blame this on church state separation

...Knee jerk, Reflexively, with zero evidence to back it up. It smacks of crass opportunism, opportunism to push a wholly unrelated agenda using the murder of 20 little kids.

Someone wants to make an asinine assertion like that to me, they need to show me some fucking evidence that "prayer in school" had diddly shit to do with any of this.

It didnt.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Wed Dec 19, 2012, 07:50 PM (1 replies)

Yes, 'cuz when a mentally disturbed kid takes the easily accessed assault weapons from his

"gun enthusiast", survivalist mom and shoots up an elementary school, obviously Atheism is somehow culpable.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Mon Dec 17, 2012, 03:49 PM (1 replies)

I think I have a new Christmas song

I banned Ken Ham for Christmas
I sent him his MIRT PPR
I banned Ken Ham for Christmas
I banned him, he wont get too far

Our Christmas feast was lacking
Our Pizza was looking quite bare
It needed some old time troll whacking
Some christmas Ham for MIRT to share

He wanted to give us the good news
How dinos and man got along
But I banned Ken Ham for Christmas
I called his shit silly and wrong.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Dec 11, 2012, 04:37 PM (2 replies)

Come on. Rice was clearly the Administration's first choice.

I like John Kerry- who, by the way, ALSO voted for the IWR- but I hate to see us lose a Senate seat.

And i don't buy for a Minute that this has been some 15 Dimensional GOP chess. They want Rice to go down so they can prove that they "took her out" because of the Bhengazi "scandal"....

There's no scandal, of course, but they've spent the past 2 months flogging it on FOX and they don't want to look stupid, sitting here with a case of scandalus interruptus and nothing to show for it. If they can remove Rice from SOS consideration, they can point to the "victory" and say "seee? There must have been something there, after all!!"
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Sun Dec 9, 2012, 01:04 AM (2 replies)

Ive seen what it looks like when a computer posts- so I'm sure theres a person behind the

Account.

The question, though, is whether the person is also behind other accounts... or has been.

I dont understand the sock thing, either- but its an astoundingly common game.

There is another game where several people share the password to an account, which can lead to inconsistencies in the "person's" posting pattern or story. Dont really understand that game, either.

Likewise, I don't understand what would motivate someone to sit in a Library and troll DU for years and years under an endless series of names.. But, as MIRT and the old Mods know, somone does.

I'll also say that Ive been paying attention to certain phenomena for a while.... Way back into DU2. I generally don't make statements without a real good reason for making them.

Lets put it this way: I have a very good memory.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Dec 7, 2012, 05:31 PM (2 replies)

I hear tell that carrying pictures of Chairman Mao can have a deleterious effect on one's sex life.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Nov 27, 2012, 01:36 PM (2 replies)

Yeah. Exactly. Speaking of what chaps some peoples' behinds.

Yes, yes, tsk tsk. There is still one entire irritatingly unlocked thread left on DU in which people refer to attractive members of the opposite, or same, sex as "hot"

OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Sun Nov 25, 2012, 03:22 AM (0 replies)

I do find it fascinating that now that the top marginal rate is likely to go back to 39%

all sorts of people are desperately pulling all sorts of creative "alternatives" out of their rears.

Robert Samuelson's idea of a "good deal" on taxes sounds oddly like something coming from someone who thinks Romney won the race:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-the-fiscal-cliff-deal-we-need/2012/11/18/3870f9c6-3014-11e2-9f50-0308e1e75445_story.html

Republicans accept immediate higher taxes on the “wealthy” — couples with more than $250,000 of income and singles with more than $200,000. Obama won the election, and that’s his minimum demand. However, it doesn’t require permanently increasing today’s top 35 percent tax rate to 39.6 percent. Instead, Obama accepts a one-year surtax or limit on deductions. During that time, Congress and the administration pledge to pursue a tax overhaul that would cut the top individual and corporate income tax rates to 30 percent.




Yes, how reasonable, Bob- let the top rate go back to pre-Bush levels for one whole year (!!!) after which, of course, we HAVE to find a way to get the rates for the poor oppressed top bracket (the so-called "wealthy" harumph harumph because no one can afford that 2nd house in the Hamptons on a measly impoverished 250K a yr harumph harumph) back down lower than they already are- say, 30%, slobber slobber drool drool.



How about this: We have an income tax in place. Large transfers of money (as opposed to assets) are ALREADY reported to the IRS. Raising the top marginal rate is a fairly simple matter, and wouldn't require any fancy new reporting or ideas.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Nov 20, 2012, 05:40 AM (1 replies)

I'm putting off the colonoscopy as long as possible

so discovering my inner remdi95 will have to wait.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Wed Nov 14, 2012, 06:27 PM (1 replies)
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »