HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Warren DeMontague » Journal

Warren DeMontague

Profile Information

Name: Jack Pruitt
Gender: Male
Member since: Thu May 20, 2004, 05:02 AM
Number of posts: 62,722

About Me

the true caliber of a man is measured in scoville units

Journal Archives

"Curtis, when you cut my hair, can you give me something that accentuates my bald spot

causes my massively outsized front teeth to look even creepier, and generally makes my head look like a big shiny penis?"

"Oh, and please hurry, because I'm on my way to Casual Male to buy a tie that looks like I ate a Backgammon Board and shat it out my neck"
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Apr 9, 2013, 09:59 PM (1 replies)

That's where I'm at, too.

I leave it to the reader to decide who they think is likely more emotionally invested in controlling the behavior of others; the topless secularists, or the religious fundamentalists.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Apr 5, 2013, 02:46 AM (0 replies)

move on over

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Thu Apr 4, 2013, 04:20 AM (0 replies)

Here's a totally made up example of the sort of logic at play:

1) Hoznofsters call themselves Flimshotters, even though Hoznofsters have a history of criticizing large swaths of other Flimshotters, telling Flimshotters they're not REAL Flimshotters, using derisive terms for other Flimshotters -like "Funflims"- who don't agree to all the Hoznofster definitions of what constitutes "real" Flimshottery, etc.

2) However... when experiencing general, widespread rebuke or -ever worse- open mockery and notbeingtakenseriouslyenough,dammit-ry... Hoznofsters will, however, immediately claim that "Flimshotters are under attack!" and even better, since Flimshotters -the larger group- are known primarily as arguing for equal rights for Wagglehorns, this allows the Hoznofster to move the argument onto a favorable playing field, because really everyone who is at all reasonable believes Wagglehorns ought to have equal rights.

3) Next move is to point out that a widely despised, if ill-defined, group- let's call them Mrazplotzes--- are known for criticizing Flimshotters.

You know what that means, right? If Mrazplotzes criticize Flimshotters and we've established by assertion that Hoznofster=Flimshotter... then everyone who criticizes a Hoznofster MUST BE a dread Mrazplotz!

It's logic!
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Apr 2, 2013, 05:19 AM (2 replies)

That's right. I usually figure that when she spends that much on me, she's after me lucky charms.

Still, I don' give it up ever' time just fer e fine piece of Halibut and an expensive Pinot... it really depen's on me mood.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Mon Mar 25, 2013, 04:05 AM (0 replies)

Chris Christie. Fat.

Yes, I said it. he's fat. Overweight. Rotund. Gravitationally endowed. Interacting excessively with the higgs boson field.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Thu Mar 21, 2013, 02:10 PM (0 replies)

according to the Copenhagen interpretation, it HAS TO BE instantaneous.

That's the whole point. It's not about "sending" information, it's that locality itself is called into question; the notion that any two points, separated by space OR time, are really 'separate' at all.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Mar 8, 2013, 01:59 AM (1 replies)

It's boobaculous!

Why, it's Sociomologicalifically objectifraculous!

Positively Male Gaze-imacularly Frimlitastically Objectifricactruous!

Downright Heteronormativantively Oppressionofrostiply Pornofologically Harmfopulous!

See, and now I "made up some words" for ya, to be followed by a silly picture. Back to middle school I go!

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Mar 1, 2013, 09:47 PM (0 replies)

Look, either address the point or don't.

It'd be nice if on this one matter, we could just agree. Like on something like this:

"Consent is a bright line that shouldn't be fucked with. No means no. Yes means yes. Coercion invalidates consent, by definition. Women have the agency to consent just as they have the agency to not consent. Clear communication being the bedrock of adult relations, consent becomes meaningless if people try to interpret yes from a "no". Giving consent once does not imply eternal consent, and consent can be revoked at any time. However, broad sociological narratives don't invalidate the fact that consensual adult sex is a reality and consenting adults MUST HAVE the freedom to make their own damn decisions about their lives and bodies."

Is that really such an egregious sentiment to get behind?
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:09 PM (1 replies)

Handy AND Handsome, dammit! Not to mention, I have huge hands.

And, ladies, you know what that means.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Tue Feb 12, 2013, 05:36 PM (0 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next »