HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Warren DeMontague » Journal
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next »

Warren DeMontague

Profile Information

Name: Rumdrinkin DeMonattea
Gender: Male
Hometown: This un
Member since: Thu May 20, 2004, 05:02 AM
Number of posts: 59,439

About Me

What do you call a man with 10 rabbits in his ***?

Journal Archives

The IWR was a "minute detail"?

No, it wasn't.

Yes, we all understand that the Dems who voted for it, did so by and large out of craven political calculus and fear of being called "soft on terror". Hell, that was obvious in 2002.

This is not something that can be re-packaged, 13 years later, as good politics or smart manoeuvring. It was a flat-out moral failure, and it sure as shit isn't some badge of honor.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Wed Feb 25, 2015, 06:00 PM (1 replies)

It's blowin' you and me

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Sun Feb 22, 2015, 07:33 PM (0 replies)

Shirley MacLaine has no clue what she's talking about. Utahraptor, on the other hand, GETS IT.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Feb 13, 2015, 09:51 PM (0 replies)

Worst. Hood Ornament. Ever.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Mon Feb 9, 2015, 08:50 PM (0 replies)

"picture her with hair"

Okay, now what?

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Feb 6, 2015, 02:42 AM (7 replies)

even better, I'm entitled to think "insidious and systematic objectification" is just what happens

to some people's hard-wired western religious sex-guilt when they filter lame-ass concepts like "lust is bad" through an overpriced sociology degree.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Fri Feb 6, 2015, 01:41 AM (2 replies)

You take your username from a guy who settled arguments by jamming his finger into peoples' eyes

People in fucking glass houses, and whatnot.
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Wed Feb 4, 2015, 05:28 AM (1 replies)

Here is how I interpret the broad religious warnings against "graven images" and why

They are a classic example of how religion, as practiced by humans, tends to get fundamental concepts wildly, spectacularly, disasterously wrong.

I believe the original messaging- which turns up in many religions, including the western monotheisms- was specifically intended to communicate the idea that "God" the concept was too big, broad, and ineffable to be contained in a word, a symbol, a picture.

More widely the intent, the deep intent, is hopefully to get people to grok that ALL their language, their symbolic abstractions, while undeniably useful tools, are just that- a necessarily limited and limiting fascimile of the real "thing", which which exists above, beyond, and outside of language.

The point is that no map will ever perfectly reflect the territory. So as long as you remember that you are dealing with a map, and not the actual thing itself, you're fine.

Religion, of course, misinterprets this to "kill everyone who makes maps"
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Sat Jan 10, 2015, 09:45 PM (0 replies)

Bullshit.

That's Pat Buchanan in a wig, is who that is.

Posted by Warren DeMontague | Wed Dec 24, 2014, 09:39 PM (4 replies)

Except, NASA is not suggesting sending astronauts to Mars just in the Orion capsule.

The capsule willl be an important part of the mission, but other habitation and shielding requirements will clearly need to be met.

And remember, no one is talking about going next week.

But to imply that this is all some huge deliberate waste of time and money, or that somehow no one has thought of the issues you bring up, is wildly disingenuous.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Space_Habitat
Posted by Warren DeMontague | Sun Dec 7, 2014, 03:53 AM (1 replies)
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next »