Bigmack
Bigmack's JournalGot de-friended today...
...and it shows what we are up against.
She posted saying that Hobby Lobby was being forced by the evil Obamacare to pay for abortions.
I posted: "You said: "Obama care mandates they pay for the actual abortion pill, as well as the surgical procedure of abortion itself."
No....
"There is no requirement in ACA that health care plans cover abortion, nor is there a prohibition preventing plans from covering abortion. Rather, ACA gives health care plans participating in state exchanges the ability to determine whether or not to cover abortion services." (The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot include any coverage of abortion as part of the essential benefits package required to be covered by health care plans. Section 1303(b)(1)(A)(i).)
"The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act maintains the status quo on abortion policy and does not shift federal abortion policy in either a pro-life or pro-choice direction. The following provisions will ensure that the bill does nothing to restrict or expand existing abortion law, while ensuring that federal funds cannot be used for abortion coverage or care." http://www.dpc.senate.gov/healthreformbill/healthbill18.pdf
"Right-wing media have responded to a Supreme Court justice's decision to temporarily block the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) birth control mandate by falsely claiming that abortifacients are included in the coverage required by the health care law." http://mediamatters.org/.../right-wing-media.../197422
"Those buying plans on the exchange would send in a separate payment to cover abortion services, and coverage for abortions (other than in cases or rape or incest or danger to the mother’s life) would be paid for from a segregated pool of money that contains no federal funds.
Furthermore, the Senate bill — now law — allows states to prohibit policies sold on their exchanges from covering abortions, with the same exceptions. And it requires that at least one plan in state exchanges not include abortion coverage beyond federal limitations." http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/the-abortion-issue/
She posted: "Why do you hate religion so much ? Why are you so hypocritical yourself? So angry you arnt(sic) included in other religious based groups as an atheist, while bashing them and making such hateful comments and not being tolerant of them? I am truly sorry if a religious person hurt you in the past...or whatever happened to you. But for someone who touts about wanting rights for everyone but bashes the religious.... It's very hypocritical."
WTF.... I'm certainly not a religion booster, but how did the debunking of what she said constitute bashing religion.
I'm telling you....the RW is getting weirder and weirder.
If the political parties are the same...
Why then do the TeaPublicans have such a large group of certifiably around-the-bend members?
Do the Dems have anybody like Gingrich, Bachmann, Inhofe, Issa, Cruz, Santorum, Gohmert, Steve King, Broun, Trump... the list is endless?
I mean.. they are dumber than shit and completely insane.
Do the Dems have any "celebrities" like Ted Nugent?
Profile Information
Member since: Mon Apr 12, 2004, 08:50 PMNumber of posts: 8,020
