HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » cal04 » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 83 Next »

cal04

Profile Information

Member since: Tue Jan 6, 2004, 12:46 PM
Number of posts: 39,269

Journal Archives

Food Stamp Families to Critics: Walk in Our Shoes

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/01/19/us/AP-US-Faces-of-Food-Stamps.html?_r=1&hp

Some have advanced degrees and remember middle-class lives. Some work selling lingerie or building websites. They are white, black and Hispanic, young and old, homeowners and homeless. What they have in common: They're all on food stamps.

As the food stamp program has become an issue in the Republican presidential primary, with candidates seeking to tie President Barack Obama to the program's record numbers, The Associated Press interviewed recipients across the country and found many who wished that critics would spend some time in their shoes.

Most said they never expected to need food stamps, but the Great Recession, which wiped out millions of jobs, left them no choice. Some struggled with the idea of taking a handout; others saw it as their due, earned through years of working steady jobs. They yearn to get back to receiving a paycheck that will make food stamps unnecessary.

"I could never have comprehended being on food stamps," said Christopher Jenks, who became homeless in his hometown of Minneapolis-St. Paul after a successful career in sales and marketing.

Breaking News On SOPA/PIPA, with Ron Wyden - Countdown with Keith Olbermann


Vote next Tuesday, pre mature
He's hoping people keep speaking out
Definitions way too broad
This has been a day for the history books

Paul Krugman:Reaganite Delusions

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/16/reaganite-delusions-2/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto

Ah. Noah Smith goes reading in the fresh waters, and finds that people there are still claiming that there was a dramatic improvement in growth once Reagan/Friedman came along.

I’ve written about this many times, e.g. here. The great era of US economic growth was the postwar generation; even during the good years of the 90s we didn’t achieve comparable growth, and overall, the post-Reagan era was marked by slower growth than the equivalent period of time pre-Reagan. And I haven’t even gotten into the income distribution thing.

All of which makes me wonder: what goes on in these peoples’ minds? Do they never even think of actually looking at the numbers, because they know that Reagan ushered in a great boom? Inquiring minds (which they obviously don’t have) want to know.

Romney to push anti-illegal immigration stance after debate

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/204373-romney-asks-immigration-hard-liners-to-be-his-surrogates-in-sc

Mitt Romney's campaign has invited a trio of anti-illegal-immigration advocates to act as surrogates in the spin room after Monday's debate in South Carolina, according to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R), one of the surrogates.

Kobach is best known for helping Arizona lawmakers to write a controversial anti-illegal-immigration bill that has since been adopted in other states — including South Carolina.

He said he will be joined by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who has said all illegal immigrants should be deported and won his seat by hammering then-Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah) for supporting amnesty for undocumented immigrants, and Bay Buchanan, a longtime conservative activist who was a senior adviser on former Rep. Tom Tancredo's (R-Colo.) 2008 presidential campaign. All three have endorsed Romney.

"The governor’s campaign has asked me to be a surrogate with him to represent him in the spin room after tonight's debate," Kobach told The Hill after clarifying that he would not be speaking at an event with Romney on Monday, as he had earlier indicated. "There will be a couple of his endorsers here — Bay Buchanan and Jason Chaffetz."

Up with Chris Hayes: Citizens United with Sen. Sanders (Part 1and 2)

&feature=player_embedded

Bernie Sanders Part 2 of 2 on "UP! with Chris Hayes

Democratic lawmaker (Rep.Gutierrez) rips Romney for his stance on immigration

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/204359-rep-gutierrez-rips-romney-for-immigration-hard-line

A leading House Democrat hammered Mitt Romney on Monday for his positions on illegal immigration.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, Capitol Hill's most vocal proponent of immigrant rights, said Romney, the front-runner in the GOP presidential primaries, has "gone way too far" to cater to conservatives on the thorny issue—a move that will backfire in states with significant Latino populations, the Illinois Democrat warned.

“There is no route to the White House that does not go through a Latino neighborhood. Any winner in either party needs a significant proportion of Latino voters,” Gutierrez said on a press call. “When you say you want millions of us to leave the country … we will vote against you.”

(snip)
"On the day that we observe Martin Luther King's birthday, Mitt Romney is … campaigning to restrict the civil rights of immigrants," Gutierrez said in a press call. "It's really appalling."

Stephen Colbert: "Corporations are people."

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/01/15/404666/stephen-colbert-corporations-are-people/

It was not until after Stephen Colbert handed the reins of the Super PAC he founded over to Jon Stewart — and the PAC was re-dubbed The Definitely Not Coordinated With Stephen Colbert Super PAC — that it released its ad accusing Mitt Romney of being a “serial killer” of corporations, based on the assertion that corporations are people and that Romney, as head of Bain Capital, oversaw the dismantling of numerous such “people.” But on ABC’s This Week this morning, Colbert himself came out decisively in favor of corporate personhood. During a back-and-forth over the role of money in politics, Colbert pointedly asked host George Stephanopoulos if he thought corporations were people. When Stephanopoulos deferred “weighing in” on the question, Colbert responded, “Corporations are people. You won’t ‘weigh in’ on whether some people are people? That seems kind of racist, George.”

&feature=player_embedded

After Supporting Health Care Mandate In 1994, Santorum Now Says He Never

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/01/15/404636/santorum-health-mandate/
After Supporting Health Care Mandate In 1994, Santorum Now Says He Never Supported Mandates

Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum (R) stepped up his criticism of GOP presidential primary front-runner Mitt Romney on CBS’ Face The Nation this morning, slamming Romney for providing “the basis” for the Affordable Care Act when he signed a comprehensive health reform law while he was governor of Massachusetts.

In addition to providing a model for national health care reform, RomneyCare is to blame for raising taxes, rising health care costs, and, worst of all, Santorum said, an individual mandate requiring people to buy health insurance. That, Santorum said, represented a government intrusion into health care that he never has and never could support:

SANTORUM: Gov. Romney’s plan, as much as he’d like to say it’s not, was the basis of Obamacare. He was for an individual mandate, he was for government top-down control of the health care system in Massachusetts. And it’s led to the highest cost health care in the nation in Massachusetts, it’s led to higher taxes. … It is an absolute disaster.

He would not have the clear record that I have…of being for government out of the health care business, being for a plan that is bottom-up, private sector health care reform. Unlike other folks in this race, I’ve had a consistent record over that time of not being for individual mandates. … He has been for individual mandates, I have not.


As Igor Volsky reported last week, however, Santorum supported an individual health insurance mandate during his 1994 Senate campaign, shortly after a host of Senate Republicans had offered the mandate as an alternative to President Clinton’s health reform plan.

video at link

Axelrod: Romney misses the point

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/15/axelrod-romney-misses-the-point/

David Axelrod said Mitt Romney's assertion that he would run against the Obama administration's bailout of the auto industry in the general election represents the different visions for America held by the Republican frontrunner and President Barack Obama.

In an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union," Axelrod, a senior adviser to the president's re-election effort, defended the auto bailout while pointing to Romney's record as CEO of Bain Capital.

"Saving an industry, as the president did, is different than strip mining companies in order to – in order to profit off of them, which is, in many cases, what Mr. Romney did," Axelrod told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley. "The question is, is that the philosophy that you want in the White House?"

(snip)
Americans are "working harder than they've ever worked, and for the last decade, their income has been flat," Axelrod said in the interview that took place Saturday. "That is a central issue of our time. How do we create an economy in which the middle class is growing, wages are growing, standards of living are not declining, but growing? That's what a successful economy looks like. He misses that point."

The super PAC founded by Stephen Colbert: Mitt Romney is a Serial Killer

The super PAC founded by Stephen Colbert, and now under the leadership of Jon Stewart, has released its first ad in South Carolina attacking Mitt Romney for his work at Bain Capital.

Money quote: "As head of Bain Capital he bought companies, carved them up, and got rid of what he couldn't use. If Mitt Romney really believes 'Corporation are people, my friend,' then Mitt Romney is a serial killer."

Here's the video:
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/01/15/mitt_romney_is_a_serial_killer.html

(snip)
In a press release announcing the ad, Jon Stewart spoke about his new role as head of the Super PAC:

Hi again, it’s me, Jon. When I took over this Super PAC, I had no idea there’d be so much email-writing. Also, there are a lot of plants around Super PAC office with extremely specific watering schedules. Seriously, does a Northwood Spotted Fern really need to be watered "thrice fortnightly at dusk"?

Anyway, The Definitely Not Coordinated With Stephen Colbert Super PAC made an ad, and I figured you’d want to know. I’ve attached the press release below, so hopefully your mouse’s scroll-wheel isn’t broken.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/15/colbert-super-pac-release_n_1207318.html
Go to Page: « Prev 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 83 Next »