HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » MrScorpio » Journal


Profile Information

Member since: 2002
Number of posts: 63,736

Journal Archives

Abe Vigoda...


William S. Burroughs - Words Of Advice

The problem isn't who's running the Government, the problem IS the Government...

And, NO. I'm NOT paraphrasing Ronald Reagan here, because Ronald Reagan was a lying-assed hypocrite.

I'm talking about people here who are accusing President Obama of committing the same types of wrongs that Bush did.

Well... In some cases, yeah. That's quite true. Because it's inevitable that the Government functions under a certain amount of continuity from administration to administration in order to exist.

THAT, in any cogent sense of understanding of what's going on, is simply why establishing precedents in government is EVERYTHING.

You simply never want bad precedents to ever be established, because of the very nature of how our government was designed, those precedents create their own justification for perpetuating themselves.

And much of the subsequent considerations of those precedents are never about abolishing them, but rather about making fine adjustments on the margins.

Reagan, when he accused the government of being the "problem", knew full well that he only meant that it was "problem" for those people (whom he served) who were waiting for him to change the function of government into upwardly directed monetary funnel, rather than one that distributed wealth and rights in a more fair manner.

What I'm saying is that, our government is simply set up to do crappy, illegal and completely unfair shit, regardless of whomever is running it.

What we're seeing is not a process that began overnight and which could be resolved at the drop of a hat. It is the result of a prolonged, well-designed effort by individuals and interest groups who have used precedent to create and maintain such a situation that facilitates all of that crappy, illegal and completely unfair shit, regardless of whomever is running it.

In spite of that, I'm a fervent supporter of the current President, Democrats in Congress and liberals, Democrats and progressives in general.

However, I really don't expect a lot of radical change out of these people for the better, given the combined arrangement of our current economic and political system, the body of laws that are currently on the books and the utterly hypocritical and highly destructive actions of the Right Wing.

So, yeah. If you're wont for accusing the Prez of screwing up, by all means, have at it. Your complaints are perfectly justified.

But please understand this, the problem doesn't necessarily lie with whomever ever is playing the game, but it is more likely a RESULT of all of the hows, whys, whens and whatfors of the GAME ITSELF.

The Right’s Made-up ‘Constitution’

July 6, 2013

For Tea Partiers and libertarians, it is an article of faith that the Constitution tightly constrained the federal government and gave broad powers to the states. But that is bogus history — mere propaganda — and suggests that the Right’s rank-and-file has never read or understood the document, says historian Jada Thacker.

By Jada Thacker

The Cato Institute’s Handbook for Policy Makers says, “The American system was established to provide limited government.” The American Enterprise Institute states its purpose to “defend the principles” of “limited government.” The Heritage Foundation claims its mission is to promote “principles of … limited government.” A multitude of Tea Party associations follow suit.

At first glance the concept of “limited government” seems like a no-brainer. Everybody believes the power of government should be limited somehow. All those who think totalitarianism is a good idea raise your hand. But there is one problem with the ultra-conservatives’ “limited government” program: it is wrong. It is not just a little bit wrong, but demonstrably false.

The Constitution was never intended to “provide limited government,” and furthermore it did not do so. The U.S. government possessed the same constitutional power at the moment of its inception as it did yesterday afternoon.

This is not a matter of opinion, but of literacy. If we want to discover the truth about the scope of power granted to federal government by the Constitution, all we have to do is read what it says.

The Constitution’s grant of essentially unlimited power springs forth in its opening phrases: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”


Wherever Snowden ends up, I'd really love it if he'd settle down and write a book

About what he knows, about his exploits, about everything.

Something, on paper in his own words, which could be poured over and even vetted by both non-expert and expert readers alike.

I don't know if he'd see a dime of profit from such a book, since it would fall under the same laws that were written in response to Phillip Agee's "CIA Diary."

But, hell, I'm sure it'd be a fascinating read... Of course, Greenwald himself would jump at the chance to pen the forward too.

Hugh Masekela - You Keep Me Hangin' On


I'm a favorite uncle to several nephews, of whom I have manhandled quite easily

Just a little guy horse-play, of course, with most of them in their late teens and even early twenties.

I'm a grown ass man and these kids are skinny ass teens... And let me tell you, there is no way that any of them could best me in horseplay, even if they tried.

It's about upper body strength as any grown man knows... A teenager can't compete in that area with a grown up.

They can outrun me, they might even outlast me in the stamina department, but you can best damn sure believe that I'd make them submit to my initial strength and adult authority before it ever got to that point.

Which, for me, seems like a bunch of complete horseshit when Z. said that Martin was beating the crap out of him to the point where his life was in danger and he had to shoot.

What kind of grown man, in his thirties mind you, would say that a skinny kid had beat the shit out of him to the point where his life was in danger?

A man who wants people to believe his bullshit excuse for shooting and killing that kid of course.

Alright, you beat me. I give up, no more fighting about it from me anymore...

That's right, you win.


What is it that am I supposed to be agreeing with you about again?

I forgot.

Good Morning, Vietnam!

Good Morning from Castle Anthrax!

Go to Page: « Prev 1 ... 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 ... 501 Next »