HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Skinner » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next »

Skinner

Profile Information

Name: David Allen
Gender: Male
Hometown: Washington, DC
Home country: USA
Member since: 2001
Number of posts: 62,344

Journal Archives

So, I had this inexplicable craving for Chipotle today...

Hillary Clinton Is Too Ambitious To Be The First Female President

A thought-provoking commentary from 2006. Worth re-reading this time around...

Hillary Clinton Is Too Ambitious To Be The First Female President
The Onion
May 24, 2006
By Gerald Collins



I think it's about time we had a female president of the United States. I don't care what anyone says: Women can be just as smart and qualified as men—especially the clowns we've had in Washington lately. But Hillary Clinton? She's just a little too ambitious to do what no woman before her has ever done.

Hillary seems to think she knows what our country needs better than anyone else, and believes that she, among the hundreds or thousands of qualified politicians, is the only one who can do it. Is that really the sort of person we want at the helm of our federal government?

Not to mention that she's extremely self-promoting. She spends almost all her time these days going to fundraising events dedicated to raising money for—you guessed it—Hillary Clinton. She's always popping up in the news with a new initiative she's spearheading or some kind of complaint against the president. I don't want to use the B word, but she seems awfully bossy to head an executive branch that employs 450,000 people.

Sen. Clinton always wants to be throwing her opinion around about this bill or that law. I saw her on Meet The Press just last week. Every time Tim Russert would take her to task on one issue or another, she'd come right back at him with some sort of smart answer. She needs to learn that sometimes you need to just accept your place; it's not polite to always act like you know things. Not to mention the fact that, as a working woman, she should take those precious Sundays to spend some time with her family, not to meet with the press on national television.

More: http://www.theonion.com/articles/hillary-clinton-is-too-ambitious-to-be-the-first-f,11229/

An Unabashedly Liberal Hillary Clinton



An Unabashedly Liberal Hillary Clinton
THE ATLANTIC, APR 13 2015, 7:02 AM ET
By PETER BEINART

Every presidential campaign is a bet on the American mood at a given moment in time. I watched Hillary Clinton’s presidential announcement video alongside the one she issued in 2007, and the speech she gave declaring her senate candidacy in New York in 2000. The upshot: America, as seen by Hillary and the people advising her, is a lot further left than it was a decade or two ago.

Here are some of the phrases that appeared in Hillary’s 2000 senate announcement: “voluntary uniform rating system for movies and films,” “welfare,” “more police on the streets,” “teacher testing in the face of boycotts,” “I don’t believe government is the solution to all our problems” and “parents, all parents, must be responsible.” The message was pure Clintonism, as developed when Bill ran the Democratic Leadership Council in the early 1990s: To deserve government help, people must be morally responsible. And it came naturally to a senate candidate who, although caricatured as a sixties radical, was better described, by a former White House aide, as “a very judgmental Methodist from the Midwest.”

(snip)

All that cultural conservatism is gone in the video she issued last night. It’s not just the image of a gay male couple holding hands while announcing their impending wedding, followed later by what appears to be a lesbian couple. It’s not just the biracial couple. Or the brothers speaking Spanish. It’s also the absence of culturally conservative imagery: no clergymen, no police, one barely noticeable church. Instead, the video starts with a woman who is moving so her daughter can attend a better school. A bit later it features a woman who after staying home with her kids is going back to work. In both cases, there’s no father in sight. Whether or not Clinton and her advisors were trying to showcase single mothers, they certainly weren’t afraid of being accused of showcasing them. In 2000, in the wake of a welfare reform debate in which single mothers were made symbols of the moral irresponsibility the Clintons campaigned against, these positive depictions would have been unimaginable.

The video Hillary released yesterday was also devoid of soldiers. And it contained no discussion of foreign policy. Compare that to Hillary’s 2007 video, the first substantive words of which were: “let’s talk about how to bring the right end to the war in Iraq and to restore respect for America around the world.” Later in that video, she championed her work “protecting our soldiers.”

More: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/an-unabashedly-liberal-hillary-clinton/390339/

Hey, check out my cool new avatar.

Pic Of The Moment: Elizabeth Warren Explains the Failure of Trickle-Down

Meet the newest member of the Skinner family: Rosie!



She is a three-year-old mixed-breed. We adopted her from the Washington Animal Rescue League. They think she is part Dalmation and part Pointer. I think there are lots of other breeds mixed in as well. She was rescued from a shelter in Mississippi and brought up to DC. She is a really good girl -- very gentle, happy, and good with kids. Her tail is always wagging!

She's also semi-famous. For the last few weeks while she was in the shelter at the Washington Animal Rescue League, she and her puppies were featured on the Animal Planet Puppy cam. You can still watch her puppies there, but alas Rosie is no longer with them. (While she was in the shelter her name was Ellie Mae, and the animal planet website still shows her old name. But there is another dog named Ellie Mae literally right across the street from us, so we decided to give her a new name.) We did not know she was on the puppy cam until after we adopted her.

What can and cannot be posted in the General Discussion forum (updated 6/22/16)

The Statement of Purpose for the General Discussion forum says this:

Discuss politics, issues, and current events. Posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports are restricted in this forum.

In an effort to provide greater clarity to members posting in this forum -- and to hosts trying to enforce this statement of purpose -- here is a detailed list of examples that should give some idea of where the line is drawn. As much as possible, we have attempted to describe current hosting practices rather than to place greater restrictions on what can be posted.

ISRAEL/PALESTINE
  • Threads about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted in the Israel/Palestine Group.

  • Open discussion of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.

RELIGION
  • Threads about current events related to religion, and threads about church-state issues are permitted under normal circumstances.

  • Threads about the existence/non-existence of God, threads discussing the merits (or lack thereof) of religion in general, and threads discussing the truth/untruth of religious dogma are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted under Religion.

  • Open discussion of religion is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.

GUNS
  • News stories (and related content) from reputable mainstream sources about efforts to strengthen or weaken gun control legislation in any jurisdiction in the United States, national news stories (and related content) from reputable mainstream sources about high-profile gun crimes, and viral political content from social media or blogs that would likely be of interest to a large majority of DU members are permitted under normal circumstances.

  • Local stories about gun crime and "gun porn" threads showing pictures of guns or discussing the merits of various firearms are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted in the Gun Control and RKBA Group.

  • Open discussion of guns is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.

SHOWBIZ
  • Threads about showbiz/celebrity culture which do not have a political angle are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted under Entertainment.

  • Open discussion of showbiz is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.

SPORTS
  • Threads about sports/sporting events which do not have a political angle are not permitted under normal circumstances and should be posted under Sports.

  • Open discussion of sports is permitted during very high-profile news events which are heavily covered across all newsmedia.

NPR: Could A Socialist Senator Become A National Brand? (Bernie Sanders)

Great story about Bernie Sanders on NPR this morning:

http://www.npr.org/2014/07/10/330193246/could-a-socialist-senator-become-a-national-brand

If you hate the DU jury system, you're going to hate this.



Introducing



www.discussionist.com



It has been two-and-a-half years since we launched the jury system as part of the DU3 upgrade, and during that time we've observed it closely and made a number of changes and improvements. Overall, we believe it has succeeded well beyond our original expectations.

Yet throughout the long process of creating the jury system and watching it in action, a question has continued to intrigue us: How well would this work if we weren't using it under such tightly-controlled conditions? That is to say, what would happen if the jury system were tried outside the relatively protected cocoon of Democratic Underground, in an open-to-all environment without ideological boundaries, where the community itself can truly take the lead in setting its own standards?

This is not an experiment we could ever hope (or would ever wish) to try here at DU. To quote from our own About page, DU is "a diverse community of people holding a broad range of center-to-left viewpoints." Therefore the jury system needs to be backed up by an active team of administrators and MIRT members who must intervene to ensure that the site does not stray too far from its intended purpose.

So we thought we would try the experiment somewhere else. If you like the jury system, and if you are curious about the possibilities, then we invite you to take a look at Discussionist.


What is Discussionist?

Discussionist is a general-interest discussion forum with a focus on current events. Unlike Democratic Underground, Discussionist is intended to be open to a wide range of different worldviews. It is not a safe-haven for a particular viewpoint, but we believe that the jury system will allow for robust, passionate discussions while maintaining a level of civility which is acceptable to the broad range of members.

We have also experimented with a new way to organize discussions. The site is separated into 11 top-level categories: news, politics, culture, sports, science, tech, money, health, life, beliefs, and fun. Within each category, every new discussion thread can be assigned to as many as 10 different forums via a simple tagging system. If someone tags a post with a tag that has not yet been used, a new forum is automatically created for that tag. In this manner, the community can spontaneously create a multitude of different forums, and content from those different forums will cross-pollinate throughout the site.

Discussionist is built on the same discussion forum software that runs Democratic Underground. So if you are familiar with DU, or with discussion forums in general, you shouldn't have too much difficulty over on Discussionist. You will notice that we have made a number of changes, both big and small, but overall the software should seem pretty familiar to you.


What does this mean for Democratic Underground?

In a word: nothing. Democratic Underground will still be here, same as it's ever been. All your friends will still be here. All the interesting and aggravating discussions will still be here. And the administrators will still be here, too. Other than being created by the same three people, Discussionist is intended to be entirely independent from Democratic Underground.


How do I join?

Just go to discussionist.com and create an account.

We encourage you to sign up with a different username from the one you use here at DU. The message board culture is going to be different over there, and it might be more fun with a different name. Don't expect to find Skinner, EarlG, or Elad posting over on Discusionist; we've changed our names too. (If you simply must use the same username, you can request it here on DU by sending a DU Mail message to Elad with the title "Discussionist username" so he can release your name to you. We have set aside all usernames from DU so trolls can't grab them on Discussionist, but we have not copied over your email or password for privacy reasons.)


A word about inevitable glitches

Discussionist is still in "beta" and there is a good chance that you may find some bugs, or stray references to "Democratic Underground" when you are over there. If you do have any problems, please post them in the Help section so we can fix them.

Easter at my house

I did not celebrate or even acknowledge the existence of Easter for about 15 years, from my early 20s until my first child was born. As far as I was concerned, it was a holiday that did not exist. But when my wife and I started a family, we thought it would be fun for the kids to have a little Easter egg hunt on Easter, like we did when we were kids. So after a decade-and-a-half hiatus, Easter returned.

Our next-door neighbors had children the same age as ours, and when we saw them outside on that Easter morning five years ago we decided on the spur of the moment that it would be more fun for everyone if we combined our Easter egg hunt. So we combined our eggs and spread them around both front yards. The kids had a blast. The whole thing lasted about 15 minutes, and then we each went back into our houses. It was a very modest event. What we didn't realize at the time was that it was the beginning of an annual tradition.

The next year we once again combined our Easter egg hunt with the next door neighbors. And we decided to add brunch, and a few other people. So EarlG came over with his wife and son. And one of my wife's co-workers came over with her family. And my adult niece was there.

The next year we invited a few other people -- families with young children. And the brunch got bigger. And the next year we added some more people. And more people the year after that. We started inviting other families in the neighborhood. This year we invited pretty much everyone we know on our block, along with a bunch of our other friends. We had about 50 people.

Among the people attending our Easter egg hunt and brunch this year, we had: Church-going devout Catholics, church-going devout Protestants, observant and non-observant Jews (including an atheist Jewish Reconstructionist who keeps kosher on Passover), lapsed Catholic and Protestant Christians, some atheist and agnostic former Christians, a number of atheist Hindus (and possibly some observant Hindus), some children with mixed families that include one Western parent and the other parent from an Asian religious tradition (Buddhism and maybe also Shintoism), a pair of Swedish nationals of indeterminate religion, and some children (including my own) whose parents are not raising them in any faith and do not tell them what they are supposed to believe.

My wife and I stayed up until 2am on Saturday night cooking the food, cleaning the house, and stuffing candy into plastic eggs. It was hard work, but it was worth it. The food was fantastic, and the people were friendly. Everyone seemed to have a good time.

That's what Easter is to me. It is not a religious holiday. But it is also not a time when anyone is made to feel bad about what they believe -- whatever it is. You can be religious or non-religious, and you don't even have to celebrate Easter in your own family. Everyone is welcome at my house on Easter. All we ask is that you be friendly and respectful to other guests, and please help yourself to all the food.
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next »