Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren SLAMS Hillary Clinton With Most Damaging Evidence To Date (Original Post) leftcoastmountains Jan 2016 OP
K&R silverweb Jan 2016 #1
It is a very good illustration of how she morphed arikara Jan 2016 #2
I have been thinking the same thing loyalsister Jan 2016 #46
"unscripted" also means "I'm not coming" to Hillary. 7962 Jan 2016 #52
Sanders believes what he's saying loyalsister Jan 2016 #56
"Sanders believes what he's saying" bvf Jan 2016 #57
Sanders also said to Clinton "you don't tell Wall street bjobotts Jan 2016 #59
Holy shoot - you're at the ultimate evil post count: 6,666 jonno99 Jan 2016 #78
Well I've fixed it! Thanks! 7962 Jan 2016 #84
I think that might have started around 1976, Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #51
Agreed! mdbl Jan 2016 #64
Absolutely! Why is this so difficult for people to admit or even understand? Dustlawyer Jan 2016 #67
There is no way I will vote for Hillary Clinton, I have always thought. pangaia Jan 2016 #74
I don't know... haikugal Jan 2016 #77
That is the #1 reason why I'll never support Clinton. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #3
Ditto! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #8
Really? This one ranks # 3 or # 4 for me. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #41
Yep. Because it so perfectly illustrates whose side she's on. And, it was CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #42
I see. Thanks for explaining that. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #62
Kickand Rec! Fuddnik Jan 2016 #4
Mark Udall - lost me and enough others to get beat in Colorado SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #5
"Cut it Out". Sure, they really listened to her. Has anyone noticed Duval Jan 2016 #6
Our global economy is chervilant Jan 2016 #10
That is beautiful! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #26
The funny thing is, chervilant Jan 2016 #66
Thank you for reminding me about Brooksley Born. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #68
Have you noticed chervilant Jan 2016 #69
The Kardashians, lol. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #71
Yep - sigh...nt jonno99 Jan 2016 #79
I truly believe that a crash is coming Unknown Beatle Jan 2016 #30
Don't forget the student loan bubble as well davidpdx Jan 2016 #53
What do you expect? PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #55
isn't it odd Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #75
Actually, I thought it was coming in October, chervilant Jan 2016 #70
perhaps from Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #76
I hope you're wrong - I fear you're right...nt jonno99 Jan 2016 #80
Might be Old Codger Jan 2016 #47
I've heard the same warning from Thom Hartmann as well and it concerns me. Duckfan Jan 2016 #60
Look at Bernie when she says what she told Wall Street dragonlady Jan 2016 #7
He is smart and wise. He sees things very clearly. senz Jan 2016 #12
that was funny; I loved it NJCher Jan 2016 #24
You are so right dragonlady Jan 2016 #36
Hillary's followers thought she was oh so FABULOUS! in that debate. senz Jan 2016 #9
Speaking of? Fed up in NJ Jan 2016 #17
This is the Bernie Group -- most of them have gotten themselves banned from this group. senz Jan 2016 #20
Elizabeth Warren knows Hillary will always sell out the American people. senz Jan 2016 #11
Has this excellent video been posted on GD-P? senz Jan 2016 #13
Done leftcoastmountains Jan 2016 #14
Thank you! senz Jan 2016 #18
More than a few of us here Senz! haikugal Jan 2016 #81
Thank goodness. senz Jan 2016 #83
Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders democrank Jan 2016 #15
K&R libodem Jan 2016 #16
"She views them as part of her constituency" NorthCarolina Jan 2016 #19
THIS IS YOUR RESPONSE TO ANYONE THAT TELLS YOU THAT CLINTON WILL NOT BE INFLUANCED BY Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #21
K&R Owl Jan 2016 #22
BERNIE FOLKS -- Please K & R this on GD-P! Need to be seen there! senz Jan 2016 #23
I have to recommend this and kick it like a field goal kicker. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #25
Kick azmom Jan 2016 #27
Spot On Rafale Jan 2016 #28
Wall Street regulates Congress. Thank you, Bernie! nt antigop Jan 2016 #29
Love that moment when the audio slows and Bernie laughs. polichick Jan 2016 #31
K&R Paka Jan 2016 #32
very much rec! (nt) paleotn Jan 2016 #33
It is truly astounding how Camp Hill supporters are attempting to explain the obvious nc4bo Jan 2016 #34
Everyone, please Rec this thread on GD-P. senz Jan 2016 #35
Hillary represents Wall Street Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #37
K & R AzDar Jan 2016 #38
K & R SoapBox Jan 2016 #39
I believe that SandersDem Jan 2016 #40
Tweeted! Thanks for posting this! peacebird Jan 2016 #43
K&R Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #44
Theres more INdemo Jan 2016 #45
Thanks leftcoastmountains Jan 2016 #48
Money, money, money. jalan48 Jan 2016 #49
It took some digging to find history on this, as my memory isn't so good bhikkhu Jan 2016 #50
Egads, the student loan one is bad davidpdx Jan 2016 #54
This clip gives us an idea about just how bad INdemo Jan 2016 #58
K&R nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #61
Difference between Hillary and Elizabeth? Stevepol Jan 2016 #63
K&R Some believe in Democracy for all, some in Wall St. nt raouldukelives Jan 2016 #65
Kick and rec. panader0 Jan 2016 #72
You dance with the ones who brung ya. sulphurdunn Jan 2016 #73
Would Elizabeth Warren be willing to repeat these words now? onwardsand upwards Jan 2016 #82
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #85

arikara

(5,562 posts)
2. It is a very good illustration of how she morphed
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:37 PM
Jan 2016

I think she really did used to care about the people until money and power became more important.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
46. I have been thinking the same thing
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jan 2016

I am seeing more and more reasons why she would avoid the "putting families first" candidate forum. Bernie and O'Malley have both confirmed for this January 9 event. Clinton was invited but has not confirmed. I doubt she will since it is unscripted and sponsored by grassroots activists.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
52. "unscripted" also means "I'm not coming" to Hillary.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 10:23 PM
Jan 2016

I've been amazed to see Sanders go on any TV show that asks him; even O'Reilly on Fox. And that was a LIVE appearance. O'Malley has done the same, although I havent seen him as much.
Hillary wont even do "Morning Joe"
I guess since she's in the lead she thinks she doesnt have to do anything she doesnt want to

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
56. Sanders believes what he's saying
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 11:45 PM
Jan 2016

People get tripped up when they are not so sure about what they are saying or if they are spinning. It's easier to remember the truth.
I am pretty sure there will be a BLM presence at the event, as well. She absolutely cannot handle herself when people put her on the spot.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
57. "Sanders believes what he's saying"
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 12:51 AM
Jan 2016

This distillation elegantly sums up his appeal.

Beautifully put!

 

bjobotts

(9,141 posts)
59. Sanders also said to Clinton "you don't tell Wall street
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 01:22 AM
Jan 2016

to quit it...you pass laws forcing them to quit it"

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
51. I think that might have started around 1976,
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jan 2016

when she was a corporate lawyer in Arkansas who started rubbing elbows with the state's richest players, eventually including people like Sam Walton, Don Tyson and Jackson Stephens.

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
64. Agreed!
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 07:19 AM
Jan 2016

I remember the First Lady Hillary Clinton and she was a lot different. Since those days she has matured into the same politician that we keep trying to replace in the House and the Senate. If she makes it to the white house, all we can hope is that she betrays the big money that put her there. Otherwise, we get the shaft again.

Dustlawyer

(10,494 posts)
67. Absolutely! Why is this so difficult for people to admit or even understand?
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:47 AM
Jan 2016

You have big money who comes to the candidates and says, "We really want this...., or we don't want that..., and we have a lot of money to give to your campaign, or we can give it to your opponent if you choose not to support us." Head up his bought off ass Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts cannot see the Quid Pro Quo, but everyone else can!

How can we allow this to go on? This is how our government, all three branches, is controlled by the corporate and the super wealthy. This is the root problem of our time. It is why we have no real effort behind Climate Change, why public schools are so bad, why we stay at war and the Pentagon cannot be audited, why we have hyper partisanship, why we have media and banking oligopolies...

Enough is enough... Feel the Bern!!!

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
74. There is no way I will vote for Hillary Clinton, I have always thought.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 12:55 PM
Jan 2016

Fortunately, even if she DOES win the primary, a BIG if, I live in NY so I won't have to even hold my nose and vote for her in the GE.

I am 72, just recently semi-retired, have a modest SS income, no pension, a modest retirement account, and must keep working part time.

I am NOT "poor." But, if I live more than another 10 years or so, I am in trouble.

Yesterday I thought about this whole money thing. And I realized.. if somebody came knocking on my door and offered me $500,000 to vote for her in the general, I am embarrassed to say, I would probably take it.

Interesting, isn't it.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
77. I don't know...
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jan 2016

My Aunt in Arkansas, who was a teacher, warned me about the Clintons back in 1987...I think they are what they are.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
41. Really? This one ranks # 3 or # 4 for me.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:03 PM
Jan 2016

But never mind: you are entitled to your own ranking preferences. No one forces you to give priority to voting the wrong way on matters of war and peace, never changing a position unless a poll / focus group says it's safe to do so, and / or being a follower, not a leader.

CharlotteVale

(2,717 posts)
42. Yep. Because it so perfectly illustrates whose side she's on. And, it was
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 07:07 PM
Jan 2016

even before she voted for war so by the time she did that I couldn't have been more against her than I already was, i.e., totally.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
62. I see. Thanks for explaining that.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 05:24 AM
Jan 2016

For me, my eyes weren't truly opened until the moment she chose to not really but sort of triangulatedly come out against the TPP. I will never trust her.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
6. "Cut it Out". Sure, they really listened to her. Has anyone noticed
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jan 2016

how stocks are beginning to dive, and the S&P is getting lower? Are we in for another Crash, as Thom Hartmann predicted(The Crash of 2016)?

I hope many will see/hear this and gain a little insight. Important post, leftcoastmountains. Thanks!


chervilant

(8,267 posts)
10. Our global economy is
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:15 PM
Jan 2016

a crumbling edifice. The hot spots--Greece, Spain, Brazil, Russia, Argentina, Ecuador, et al.--have been or are being pressured to privatize and sell their most valuable assets to the World Bank (e.g., the minuscule number of corporate megalomaniacs, the vile psychopaths whose hubris knows no bounds), and this may keep the whole house of cards from blowing apart for a little while.

However, I agree with Born, Stiglitz, Wolff, Palast, and countless others who've warned that the Band-Aid approaches of those who've usurped our media, our politics, AND our global economy will only delay the inevitable.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
66. The funny thing is,
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:42 AM
Jan 2016

I used to get blasted for saying this, and for posting a cumulative list of events I've witnessed during my brief stint on this planet that portend our species' inevitable disintegration.

Also, as a social scientist, I did research that led me to conclude that the S&Ls would go belly up in the mid 80s (several of my colleagues apologized for belittling me after that crash, when they were jobless), and I told anyone who would listen that the sub-primes were a big threat, and look what happened then. I firmly believe that the evidence is there if we but look for it.

If you have not already done so, look up Brooksley Born, and see how she was vilified and eliminated by Uncle Miltie's minions from her government post over derivatives. The derivatives market is yet another reason our global economy is shaking like a big bowl of jello.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
69. Have you noticed
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:23 AM
Jan 2016

how few people can name the major "players" in our increasingly dysfunctional global economy? Yet, the same armchair pundits can tell you every detail of the lives of the Kardashians.



Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
30. I truly believe that a crash is coming
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jan 2016

sometime in 2016. There's a pattern that has been around for decades and it happens in other countries as well. When financial meltdowns happens to other individual countries, such as Mexico, the US hardly feels it, but when it happens in the US, the whole world feels it. But I digress.

The pattern involves a sitting president about to exit due to an election and then the shit hits the fan. In Mexico, a president can only serve six years and that's it, one six year term. When Salinas de Gortari was about to leave office, the country experienced one of the worst economic disasters that ever hit the country. People with house mortgages had to pay interest on the interest plus their payment to keep the house, and the interest was more than the house payment. As you can probably guess, hundreds of thousands of people across Mexico lost their homes. Inflation was so bad that in less than a year, the peso went from 12.50 to the dollar to 2500 pesos to the dollar.

Back to the US. Wall St. is gambling with our money and in December 2007, the start of the Great Recession, thirteen months before Bush left.

And now, with Wall St. up to the same shenanigans as before, the Crash of 2016 is coming.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
55. What do you expect?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 11:32 PM
Jan 2016

All the countries colonized by every nation except Britain have been epic failures. Oh sure, our interference in South America hasn't helped but as a rule none of those countries really believed in creating infrastructure where they colonized. Instead, it was all about the sucking sound of wealth transference to the motherland as it were. No centers of higher learning were funded for the most part. With France it was about you being to pay for transportation from whatever colony and they would hook you up with college in France. By that token only a select few can afford a higher education.
Mexico is an oligarchy plain and simple. 40 families rule that country and I've heard they're in bed with the drug cartel as well. My point being is when you have an oligarchy that pushes to have a virtually non-existent middle class you don't have a strong, stable economy. When you couple this with the fact they eat up that Free Trade nonsense that the WTO peddles, race to the bottom, everyone remaining in that middle class takes it on the chin or some other nation even worse than they are.
The one compliment I can't give enough to Central and South America is that while a lot of people may be poor down there they're much more active and conscious in regards to their food, in terms of concerns for GMO's.

Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
75. isn't it odd
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jan 2016

That all the time the wealth cozy themselves away from the scary wild world, the worst of the worst eventually infiltrates into their 'safe' enclave and chews their very souls down to the bone.

Now they must rub elbow with the cartels.

God forbid they would ever start by just doing the right thing for society in whole. Same 'ol history repeating over and over. Really Sad



chervilant

(8,267 posts)
70. Actually, I thought it was coming in October,
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jan 2016

but I guess the corporate oligarchy found ways to keep it from blowing apart.

Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
76. perhaps from
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jan 2016

speculation from the newly de-legislated embargo of US Oil exports amongst other sham spit & duct tape to hold it together a little longer.

dunno

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
60. I've heard the same warning from Thom Hartmann as well and it concerns me.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 04:09 AM
Jan 2016

The way Thom describes it gives me chills. So who wins if there is a crash before/during the primaries? Bernie or Hillary?

NJCher

(35,620 posts)
24. that was funny; I loved it
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:54 PM
Jan 2016

It's at the 3:41 mark.

On another topic, Elizabeth Warren can really tell a story. She's got it all in terms of being a communicator: knows when to raise and lower the voice, timing, eye contact, gestures, and clear diction.


Cher

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
36. You are so right
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:40 PM
Jan 2016

Professor Warren's classes must have been among the most popular at Harvard Law School.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
9. Hillary's followers thought she was oh so FABULOUS! in that debate.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:12 PM
Jan 2016

They gushed and gushed and pledged their souls all over again. Oooo, she was wonderful!! She won! She won!

I used to think political blindness existed only among Fox News viewers.

 

Fed up in NJ

(35 posts)
17. Speaking of?
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:32 PM
Jan 2016

Where are all the Hillary supporters on this thread? To busy claiming how dishonest Bernie is on another thread? Hello? Hill-shrills.... where are you?!?!

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
20. This is the Bernie Group -- most of them have gotten themselves banned from this group.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:39 PM
Jan 2016

Go out to General Discussion: Primaries (GD-P), find the other version of this thread and give it a kick (make a comment) and recommend it.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
11. Elizabeth Warren knows Hillary will always sell out the American people.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:18 PM
Jan 2016

She as much as admits it in this video. But for the sake of her (unequivocally important) position in the Senate and in American politics at this time in history, she has to be very careful not to alienate the Clintons.

I wouldn't be surprised if she's already explained this to Bernie who, as a seasoned, savvy politician himself, would understand and not hold it against her.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
18. Thank you!
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jan 2016

Need to be seen.

But right now the other side is k & r'ing the most insulting anti-Bernie threads.

I wish some of our folks would come over from JPR once in a while. We still need them here.

Reason: many voters lurk on DU and are affected by what they see.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
83. Thank goodness.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:50 PM
Jan 2016

I truly believe we need a strong, admirable presence in the months leading up to the convention.

Even if we do have to take showers after posting in GD-P

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
21. THIS IS YOUR RESPONSE TO ANYONE THAT TELLS YOU THAT CLINTON WILL NOT BE INFLUANCED BY
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 05:39 PM
Jan 2016

her Wall Street transnational Corporate puppet masters. Done and Done


Well.....so much for Warren as VP LOL

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
25. I have to recommend this and kick it like a field goal kicker.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jan 2016

How much do we love Elizabeth Warren?!

The suggestion that campaign donations do not influence the office holder is absurd in the extreme.

Paka

(2,760 posts)
32. K&R
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jan 2016

It's as plain as the nose on your face. Another video that needs to be seen again and again and again.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
34. It is truly astounding how Camp Hill supporters are attempting to explain the obvious
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016

weaknesses of this candidate.

There she blows, right there, in yer face and they still try to spin yarn out of weeds.

This is a corporate candidate and no friend of the 99%.

UnfreakingREAL.

Just say Hill NO.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
35. Everyone, please Rec this thread on GD-P.
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jan 2016

Hilary supporters are calling it a RW "hit job" and trying to bury it.

It NEEDS your RECs.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
37. Hillary represents Wall Street
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jan 2016

However, she also represents victims of mortgage fraud in New York. What did she do for them?

SandersDem

(592 posts)
40. I believe that
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jan 2016

behind some closed door somewhere Wall Street said, if you back us on this bankruptcy bill, we will back you all the way to the White House. And they are.

In the years that have past, the middle class is virtually disappearing in America. When it does, will Wall Street groove on the rubble or back slavery?

bhikkhu

(10,712 posts)
50. It took some digging to find history on this, as my memory isn't so good
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 10:02 PM
Jan 2016

Searching "US bankruptcy law history", oddly enough, came up with various write-ups with no mention of anything happening after 1978. But searching "GW bush bankruptcy" found an article where he signed the bill into law in 2005, then led to other good informative pieces.

I don't know if the law has had a dire impact on people in general, though it probably made the great recession worse for many. It did, apparently, backfire for the credit card issuers who were the primary lobbyists. Believing that they would see fewer credit defaults they lent like drunken sailors, only to see defaults skyrocket within a few years. I remember the days when it was so easy and normal to get a stack of easy-qualifying credit card offers, and for people to regularly run up debts that way. Looking at the numbers, credit card debt peaked in 2008, and has declined steadily since then to the lowest level in 15 years or so (?w=1024&h=576). Not the kind of growth model the industry was looking for, and they have to make up for it by charging higher fees and worse penalties, which only makes them more disliked and distrusted than they already were.

(of course, student debt seems to be the real story, and the real problem nowadays)

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
58. This clip gives us an idea about just how bad
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 12:51 AM
Jan 2016

the Keystone Pipeline will be for our environment.
This is an old clip but still Hillary Clinton has danced around this issue while she was SOS and while she has been a Presidential
Candidate. Her statement about the Keystone issue remains the same "she has repeatedly said "she hasn't seen the final draft or proposal of the TAR Sands pipeline yet".
On the other hand Bernie Sanders stance on this issue is firm.."NO" to the Keystone Pipeline, its that simple.

http://democratsforprogress.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=5917

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)
63. Difference between Hillary and Elizabeth?
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 06:20 AM
Jan 2016

Night and day. I would vote for Elizabeth in a nanosecond and never regret it. Now, I'm hoping and praying I don't have to vote for Hillary. She has the role down perfectly, knows just how to inflect and nuance so that she can do what her financial advisers would have her do in the end. She'll look and sound good no matter what, but she won't get anything much done, and I know at some point, when I'm least expecting it, she is going to go off the tracks and get us into a deeper involvement in some ME country or just start some new war based on pride and false patriotism.

She'd be better than Trump I'm sure or any of the clowns on the other side and she has a ton of good personal qualities, so like everybody else, I'll be pulling for her to stand up to the idiots in Congress and in the country when they start pushing for what is obviously wrong-headed and destructive, but I know what will happen as sure as 2 + 2 = 4.

 

onwardsand upwards

(276 posts)
82. Would Elizabeth Warren be willing to repeat these words now?
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 03:44 PM
Jan 2016

Thanks for posting this -- it's very illuminating.

As politicians pass over the threshold of power, they shed their principles like Hawking radiation...

Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Elizabeth Warren SLAMS Hi...