New DemCoalition (former DLC) Start Triangulation by Dissing Progressive/Populists...(My Title)
Moderate Democrats Get Leadership’s Ear on 2016 MessagingBy Emma Dumain
There’s some good news for the moderate House Democrats who believe they’ve been marginalized in discussions on party messaging: Leadership might be starting to listen.
On Thursday morning, New Democrat Coalition Chairman Ron Kind of Wisconsin met privately with Democratic Policy and Communications Committee Chairman Steve Israel of New York, both lawmakers confirmed to CQ Roll Call.
Israel, charged with developing a unified narrative to help the minority pick up House seats next year, wanted to talk to Kind about the substance of the New Democrats’ “American Prosperity Agenda,” 23 policy proposals that centrist Democrats contend are keys to winning again in swing districts.
Israel had some news to share with Kind: DPCC-commissioned polling shows the New Democrats are onto something.
“Fundamentally, what we come down to is this: In order to win, you have to get people to vote for you who haven’t voted for you, and the only way to do that is with a message that resonates across a broad swath of voters,” Israel said. “You can’t keep doing the same thing to the same people. You have to resonate with people who may vote for you or may not vote for you. I think Ron was absolutely correct, tactically and strategically, in how you frame that and deliver that.
“Our research and the New Dems’ research agree on the sense that voters have that the economy is changing quickly and [they] want tools to help them stay ahead, so we’re completely aligned on that,” he said. “Making sure we have an economic agenda that supports growth and prosperity for all. … New Dems have a very substantive, positive, solution-oriented agenda, and our data tells us we need to have the same.”
None of those insights seem particularly contentious — and that might be part of the point. One of the things Israel wants to do as he synthesizes the many voices in the House Democratic Caucus is craft a narrative that can speak to as wide a reach of voters as possible and on which a majority of members can agree.
The New Democrats’ “American Prosperity Agenda” also seeks to frame issues using inviting, non-incendiary language — even as many of the agenda’s pro-business policies, such as an overhaul of the tax code, will be harder to sell in the party than the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.
The agenda also advocates for certain issues — policies to boost scientific and technological innovation to make the United States competitive in the global economy, for example — be brought to the forefront of the Democratic message.
In an interview with CQ Roll Call Thursday, Kind said New Democrats want to impart to colleagues that “there are various ways of saying the same things in a different tone and a different way and that’s what I think is going to be valuable to a lot of our vulnerable, at-risk members, both for recruitment and in districts where we have to be competitive.”
Still, progressive Democrats — those who want to see the party take more aggressive stands on the environment, women’s rights and minority issues — may balk at seeing leadership leading on the New Democrats.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus, now the largest contingent in the House, has been emboldened recently by the emergence of new leaders such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio.
Progressives contend the key to winning back the House — and keeping the White House — is being unafraid to advocate for policies that fall clearly on the left of the political spectrum. CPC Co-Chairman Keith Ellison, D-Minn., has urged Democrats to embrace the term “liberal,” arguing it’s a designation that needs no apology.
MORE AT:
http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/moderate-democrats-get-leaderships-ear-2016-messaging/?dcz=
= new reply since forum marked as read
Nauseating! But, then, Hillary has lots of money and many working for her who have more power than we "Progressive/Populists" have (at this point) to put out this kind of stuff to the willing sychophants in the News Media. 
What "Millions in the Political War Chest can DO!" UGH. And lets get rid of these DINO's like Steve Israel and Debbie Wasserman-Schutz.
This is getting ridiculous that they are cutting off a wing of their OWN PARTY. Do they "secretly want" Repubs to Win or is it just about HILLARY...the ANNOINTED? Why is it always about HILLARY and her VICTIMIZATION that SHE ....Needs to WIN?
I still have "We Came, We Saw, He Died" about Libya rattling around in my brain as to what kind of morals she has. Look at the Carnage in the ME! I'd expect that kind of statement/trash to come out of Graham/McCain or George Bush II's mouth rather than a Democrat as Head of the US Department of State...(in charge of Diplomacy...not WAR).
Should we blame Monica and the Repub Scaife well timed Scandal........... or look that it was always on the AGENDA....and Monica was just the "side show?"
What will we get with Hillary? And, Obama in the latter part of his Second Term is looking to compete or TOP Bill in his TPA/TPP/TPIP after he Bailed out the Criminal Banks that are just this week revealed as Second and Third Offenders who will not be Jailed...but "Fined" once again.
there being no Senate Progressive Caucus
yet. 
is with the messaging and packaging and not the policies
