Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why would Warren endorse a candidate who is a great pal of Wall Street? (Original Post) Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 OP
I am glad you asked: guillaumeb Jun 2016 #1
Good question that many are asking, elleng Jun 2016 #2
Protecting her status in the Senate. Beowulf Jun 2016 #3
I'm sure she was threatened with loosing her senate seat if she did not "Fall in line". Awknid Jun 2016 #11
Attacking Trump while Sanders was speaking in his rally is evidence in my view. atomingai Jun 2016 #13
Oh, I don't think she was directly threatened, Beowulf Jun 2016 #14
^This^. snot Jun 2016 #25
BINGO. E. Warren is a great admirer of Bernie and what he stands for ... KPN Jun 2016 #33
She's not up for reelection until 2018 n/t jamese777 Jun 2016 #27
She can further the cause from the Senate. She may have been afraid of losing that option senz Jun 2016 #38
Maybe because she wants Trump defeated The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #4
They are presuming that Bernie supporters will go flocking to Clinton if Warren is running mate Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #5
You are more optimistic than I am. Jackilope Jun 2016 #6
I am always optimistic. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2016 #7
Well, I am feeling better reading your outlook. Jackilope Jun 2016 #10
Hopefully you are right Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #31
Exactly right -- a speed bump. Great way to put it ... KPN Jun 2016 #34
Well Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #8
Hillary. Trump isn't owned by them. HER is. Jennylynn Jun 2016 #9
Trump is owned by the big banks... big time radical noodle Jun 2016 #21
Trump Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2016 #22
I thought he financed his own campaign ? Jennylynn Jun 2016 #23
Hillary. 840high Jun 2016 #15
Hillary - definitely Hillary. Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #29
Hillary. As for your first sentence though -- neither is right. KPN Jun 2016 #35
Did Warren ask for any issues addressed in exchange for her endorsement? HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #12
I'll never know the reason why... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #16
She told Rachel she wanted the process to play out splat Jun 2016 #17
that's what I heard too. floppyboo Jun 2016 #19
She wants a job next year SmittynMo Jun 2016 #18
So long as she stays in the Senate, unless they all know something more than they are letting on floppyboo Jun 2016 #20
I think she was trying to play honest broker in this. Ken Burch Jun 2016 #24
55% of American households jamese777 Jun 2016 #26
what is your point? Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2016 #30
It is the Christian thing to do... Jack Bone Jun 2016 #28
I could hardly believe it. Duval Jun 2016 #32
Since Wall Street sees Sen. Warren as a hostile agent... Pluvious Jun 2016 #36
Because the alternative is worse? corkhead Jun 2016 #37

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. I am glad you asked:
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:12 PM
Jun 2016

Some possibilities

1)Perhaps she hopes to be an influence in a possible HRC administration?

2) Because HRC is the best of the remaining candidates?

3) Because Warren does not feel that HRC is closed to new ideas?

I could come up with more, but that is a start.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
14. Oh, I don't think she was directly threatened,
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 10:12 PM
Jun 2016

but she does know how the place works. Schumer will become party leader in the Senate. He's as connected to Wall Street as the Clintons. So Warren is looking at having two corporate Democrats directly over her. She worked hard this last congress to increase her influence. She wasn't going to risk that unless she thought Bernie had a great shot at winning.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
33. BINGO. E. Warren is a great admirer of Bernie and what he stands for ...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:18 PM
Jun 2016

no question about that in my mind. But she's also not going to torpedo her own future ability to have influence and make progressive change.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
38. She can further the cause from the Senate. She may have been afraid of losing that option
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jun 2016

if she came out and endorsed Bernie.

We should all note that she did not endorse Hill until the establishment media closed off possibilities and forced the hold-out Democrats to fall in line.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
4. Maybe because she wants Trump defeated
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:22 PM
Jun 2016

and is willing to work with Hillary if she thinks it's necessary in order for that to happen? I wish she had endorsed Bernie a long time ago but Warren might be a good and useful influence on Hillary.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
7. I am always optimistic.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:31 PM
Jun 2016

If I weren't an optimist I'd just sit at home and fret. I think that even with Hillary as president (which doesn't thrill me) there are still a lot of opportunities for progressives to make changes at the state and local level. Hillary is just a speed bump, IMO.

Jackilope

(819 posts)
10. Well, I am feeling better reading your outlook.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:49 PM
Jun 2016

I have a friend going to Chicago for sessions on continuing the Progressive causes and think Bernie's revolution and vision will continue on -- especially with our youth.

KPN

(15,642 posts)
34. Exactly right -- a speed bump. Great way to put it ...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jun 2016

can I get a bumper sticker that says that?

We will eventually see an FDR type President and Congress. It's just a matter of whether it's 2020, 2014 or 2018. It won't come any later than that IMO.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,402 posts)
8. Well
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 09:35 PM
Jun 2016

Either she's a sellout (boo!) or maybe Hillary isn't such a "darling of Wall Street"?


Which candidate do you think Wall Street is going to get more out of as POTUS?

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
21. Trump is owned by the big banks... big time
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:52 PM
Jun 2016

He owes them hundreds of millions of dollars. They can make him do anything they want.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,402 posts)
22. Trump
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 12:04 AM
Jun 2016

is the freakin' ringleader of Wall Street, is Wall Street manifested in human form. I can't believe what I'm hearing here!

KPN

(15,642 posts)
35. Hillary. As for your first sentence though -- neither is right.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:24 PM
Jun 2016

Hillkary has already been purchased. And Warren's smart enough to know she has a great future and plenty of time ahead of her so no reason to rock the boat the way Bernie did (and had to given his age). Bernie did a great and courageous thing in paving the way for a future FDR type leader to take the reins (possibly Warren) within the next 4-12 years. As VO said above, Hillary's just a speed bump along the way.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
16. I'll never know the reason why...
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:00 PM
Jun 2016

... probably no one will right away.

Her involvement, even on the ticket does not influence me, because the election was stolen a long time ago. It isn't anything but watching what has been predicted and has been happening with provisional ballots.

I'll watch the law suit, and reserve anything for comment, as I respect Warren. I do not respect, trust or will ever vote for Hillary.

There... I've said it.

splat

(2,294 posts)
17. She told Rachel she wanted the process to play out
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:00 PM
Jun 2016

That's why she didn't endorse.
She would endorse whoever won.

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
19. that's what I heard too.
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:28 PM
Jun 2016

It's politics. Warren is insanely popular yet also 'legitimate'. She's also a fuck of a lot smarter than me, and her backyard isn't my backyard. I'm giving her a pass on this.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
18. She wants a job next year
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jun 2016

She played her cards right. I knew she was waiting til she was presumptive. She played the game like a pro.
And yes, I'm very disappointed in her.

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
20. So long as she stays in the Senate, unless they all know something more than they are letting on
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jun 2016

Her and Bernie, after this election is done, and the dems strengthen their weight in the senate, will be the defacto rulers. And Hillary will be so chumy BFF's to win and will be beholden to them (to steal a phrase from another group), that she won't be able to fight back against those 2 together. This is my wish.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
24. I think she was trying to play honest broker in this.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:58 AM
Jun 2016

And it's significant that she didn't endorse HRC while the race was still in play.

jamese777

(546 posts)
26. 55% of American households
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:19 AM
Jun 2016

have stock market investments, usually through 401.ks. That percentage has been as high as 65% in 2007. Senator Warren is not advocating Wall Street's destruction, she is for transparency, reform and stiffer regulation.

Pluvious

(4,308 posts)
36. Since Wall Street sees Sen. Warren as a hostile agent...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jun 2016

Then how this plays out in the weeks and months ahead, while partnered up with Hillary, will eventually reveal just what the Banksters got for all the millions They funneled her way.

As for Warren, she is a successful politician, a feat requiring many skills - the most important of which is survival. Without which achieving she can't pursue her agenda.

Let's just pray to Zeus her core values are pure and incorruptible.

So say we all ?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Why would Warren endorse ...