Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OK, Rug, school me on Augustine! (Original Post) stone space Apr 2016 OP
Lol! I'm no expert but here's a good start: rug Apr 2016 #1
I'm reminded of old discussions on gay marriage over the last couple of decades. stone space Apr 2016 #2
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
1. Lol! I'm no expert but here's a good start:
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 04:34 PM
Apr 2016
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl201/modules/Philosophers/Augustine/augustine_justwar.html

As the article points out, he talked about the right to go to war in the first place (jus ad bellum) and the moral conduct of a war, once started (jus in bello).

This might have been all well and good when the heaviest weapon of war was an elephant but, even as a philosophical exercise, it's time has long passed.

Aquinas reduced the morality of war to a syllogism, as he did everything. I'm glad his primary interest was not sex.

http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl201/modules/Philosophers/Augustine/augustine_justwar.html
 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
2. I'm reminded of old discussions on gay marriage over the last couple of decades.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:47 PM
Apr 2016
Aquinas reduced the morality of war to a syllogism, as he did everything. I'm glad his primary interest was not sex.


This one guy would talk about how, when trying to decide on whether to marry his future spouse, talked about how he divided a single page with a column for "pros" and another for "cons".

Fortunately for their relationship, the list of "pros" were longer than the list of "cons".

I couldn't imagine myself ever doing something like that, so in my irreverence, I posted a link to a scene from an old Star Trek episode that I remembered.

The scene works better as a comment of the uses of logic in love than it does as a comment on the uses of logic in war, but here it is, anyway:


"Sit down and be quiet. My God Spock you almost died. So, for once you will lay there and be quiet. Nurse if he gets out of line you may stun him."

Spock brow rises at this.

"Emotional isn't she?" Spock says to Sarek

"She always has been so." He replies. This gets him a playful slap from his wife.

"Oh you," she says. "I am human."

Sarek seems to almost smile. "Yes, my very human wife."

"Why did you marry her?" Spock asks

"It seemed like the logical thing to do at the time."












Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»OK, Rug, school me on Aug...