HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Welcome & Help (Forum) » Question ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:57 PM

Question ...

There are specific posters that I really enjoy. Is there a way to set a filter that picks up and presents their posts?

9 replies, 2108 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
Reply Question ... (Original post)
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2012 OP
Skinner Jul 2012 #1
1StrongBlackMan Jul 2012 #2
proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 #3
gkhouston Jul 2012 #4
proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 #5
Ptah Jul 2012 #7
proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 #9
proverbialwisdom Jul 2012 #6
Neoma Jul 2012 #8

Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Original post)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:31 PM

1. Not yet.

But there will be. Hopefully soon. We are going to give members the ability to subscribe to specific members and have their threads appear under the My Subscriptions tab.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Reply #1)

Fri Jul 13, 2012, 01:48 PM

2. Cool ...

It's not that I don't enjoy scrolling ... It's just that DU has a fair number of factless hair-on fire posters and I prefer to read post from those that are fact-based ... even when I disagree with their point of view.

Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Reply #1)

Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:57 AM

3. I hope this feature will come with a mandatory OPT-IN/OUT provision.

Otherwise, it's definitely inhibitory. I think the upside (easy access) is outweighed by the likely potential abuses (the very reasons why interesting, factually dense material may not be widely known). Didn't Facebook try and retract something similar when they facilitated automatic oversharing of each member's every update?

Please consider providing DU members the choice of participating in this post aggregating feature or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to proverbialwisdom (Reply #3)

Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:10 PM

4. Wouldn't the "opt out" be choosing not to add anyone to your list?



Although some will probably share their "subscription list", I wouldn't think most DUers would bother (or care much about the contents of others' lists), so I'm not seeing the abuse potential.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gkhouston (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:04 AM

5. You're looking at it backwards.

The opt-in or out would refer to granting permission for your own posts to be aggregated beyond your own Journal, or not. I personally consider the feature a bad idea and would opt out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to proverbialwisdom (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:08 PM

7. I can already aggregate your posts. This change would just make it easier.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ptah (Reply #7)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:47 PM

9. Leave it like it is, IMHO, or allow choice.

David Wilcox "Leave it Like it Is"



Jan 9, 2010

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gkhouston (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:58 AM

6. For example, were I to post this some SMALL#WHO SAW might strongly attempt to shout down discussion.

Last edited Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:17 AM - Edit history (2)

Or so DU history would suggest. IMO, it is a bad idea that EVERY such post be easily alerted to those who inexplicably and vociferously attack these scientists and their work. Minority voices merit protection. The feature should be voluntary. Participation should be my choice. I think posting could rapidly become tediously repetitive (answering criticism), otherwise.

http://www.autismwhyandhow.org/why-arent-we-there-yet-valuable-but-incomplete-measures-of-brain-changes-in-babies-with-autism/

WHY ARENíT WE THERE YET? Valuable but incomplete measures of brain changes in babies with autism

In my opinion the recent research paper, Differences in White Matter Fiber Tract Development Present from 6 to 24 Months in Infants with Autism (Am J Psychiatry 2012 ; 169 :589-600), reports a very important finding and represents a huge amount of work, but the study is quite incomplete both in what was chosen to be measured and how the findings are interpreted by the investigators, Jason Wolff et al. Moreover, even though this study has been touted in the news as a way of detecting autism early, it really isnít ready for prime time as a clear indicator of the autism diagnosis. I think this finding is about things that occur downstream of other biological factors that are driving these changes. Ė And because these changes are downstream, they are fuzzier in that they reflect a mixture of lots of other influences. This makes it hard for them to clearly demarcate risk from lack of risk. Measuring whatís upstream might bring us closer to a clinically useful brain measure of autism risk in young infants.

Because I am a brain researcher, I spend a lot of time thinking about different techniques to measure things in the brain. Let me explain to you why people study things like this, what was measured in this study, and what it means. Then Iíll be able to explain to you why this study is both important and incomplete.

<...>

4. What can we do about this? First of all, the concerned public needs to understand what this is about and put this paper into a broader perspective. Second, the concerned public and scientists need to understand the assumptions they are making (like that autism is fundamentally social), and that other defensible assumptions (like that underlying biology produces social ďsymptomsĒ) may provide useful insights. THEN we need to get the research done that will produce truly whole-body, whole systems data about the brain, the brain in the body and the brain-body system in the world. That is my own research agenda, and the agenda of my research program, the TRANSCEND Research Program. My group and others with similar approaches need to network together so we can get this complex task done in a coordinated, efficient and timely fashion to more directly address the public health crisis that autism represents.

And last but not least -or rather of first and highest priority, while that is going on we need to use the knowledge we already have about whole body strategies for making life all it can be to create an Autism Revolution that helps large numbers of people right now.

Blog by Martha R. Herbert, PhD, MD, Posted July 15, 2012

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skinner (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:14 PM

8. That's so awesome!

You think it'd be handy for MIRT?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread