Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumCockblocking Rapists Is A Moral Obligation; or, How To Stop Rape Right Now
...
The thing is, rapists absolutely need one thing to operate. They need people to believe they are not rapists. Stranger rapists do that by trying to hide that they are the person who committed the rape. Acquaintance rapists do that by picking targets who wont say anything about what happened, or by using tactics that, if the survivor does speak up, people will decide dont really count as rape. If you want to do something about rapists, make sure people know they are rapists.
Im talking right-now solutions, literally something you can do tomorrow, so I dont mean that over time we can change the culture so that alcohol-facilitated assaults are understood as rape. Lots of people are working on that. What I mean is that you can tell everyone you know that the person that you know raped someone, because the survivor told you and maybe only a few other people, is a rapist. You may not be able to say how you know, because you may not have the survivors permission to talk about it. But you can quietly tell your friends.
...
What can people do with unsubstantiated accusations? Quite a lot, actually. If youre watching someone pushing one of your friends to have another round and getting handsy, would it be better to know if another person in your social circle said, that person raped me? Yeah, that would be important to know. And if two different people said it? And, given the silence around rape and the low reporting rates, one story is often an important catalyst for another. Once one story is out there, others tend to come up. The more data, the easier it is to compare, and evaluate credibility based on multiple data points. And what then? Then, accountability. That can look like a lot of different things. It can look like prosecution. It can look like some model of transformative justice, though I wont try to make a pitch for transformative justice models because I wont do it as well as its advocates would.* It might look like ostracization, because any social group, when someone harms its members, ought to be able to say, youre not welcome here anymore.
Some people will say thats rumormongering. Yes. Yes, it is. If stopping rape isnt a good enough reason to spread rumors to you, then you and I have nothing further to discuss.
Some people will say that its unfair to do that, to simply take the survivors word, to say things about people without due process. Well, due process is for the government, to limit their power to lock people up or take their property. You dont owe people due process when you decide whether to be friends with them. You dont have to have a hearing and invite them to bring a lawyer to decide whether to invite them to a party. And lets be honest, most of us repeat things that one person we know did to another person we know based on nothing more than that one participant told us and we believe them. We do it all the time, its part of social interaction.
...
http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2013/10/20/cockblocking-rapists-is-a-moral-obligation-or-how-to-stop-rape-right-now/
The thing is, rapists absolutely need one thing to operate. They need people to believe they are not rapists. Stranger rapists do that by trying to hide that they are the person who committed the rape. Acquaintance rapists do that by picking targets who wont say anything about what happened, or by using tactics that, if the survivor does speak up, people will decide dont really count as rape. If you want to do something about rapists, make sure people know they are rapists.
Im talking right-now solutions, literally something you can do tomorrow, so I dont mean that over time we can change the culture so that alcohol-facilitated assaults are understood as rape. Lots of people are working on that. What I mean is that you can tell everyone you know that the person that you know raped someone, because the survivor told you and maybe only a few other people, is a rapist. You may not be able to say how you know, because you may not have the survivors permission to talk about it. But you can quietly tell your friends.
...
What can people do with unsubstantiated accusations? Quite a lot, actually. If youre watching someone pushing one of your friends to have another round and getting handsy, would it be better to know if another person in your social circle said, that person raped me? Yeah, that would be important to know. And if two different people said it? And, given the silence around rape and the low reporting rates, one story is often an important catalyst for another. Once one story is out there, others tend to come up. The more data, the easier it is to compare, and evaluate credibility based on multiple data points. And what then? Then, accountability. That can look like a lot of different things. It can look like prosecution. It can look like some model of transformative justice, though I wont try to make a pitch for transformative justice models because I wont do it as well as its advocates would.* It might look like ostracization, because any social group, when someone harms its members, ought to be able to say, youre not welcome here anymore.
Some people will say thats rumormongering. Yes. Yes, it is. If stopping rape isnt a good enough reason to spread rumors to you, then you and I have nothing further to discuss.
Some people will say that its unfair to do that, to simply take the survivors word, to say things about people without due process. Well, due process is for the government, to limit their power to lock people up or take their property. You dont owe people due process when you decide whether to be friends with them. You dont have to have a hearing and invite them to bring a lawyer to decide whether to invite them to a party. And lets be honest, most of us repeat things that one person we know did to another person we know based on nothing more than that one participant told us and we believe them. We do it all the time, its part of social interaction.
...
http://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2013/10/20/cockblocking-rapists-is-a-moral-obligation-or-how-to-stop-rape-right-now/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1523 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cockblocking Rapists Is A Moral Obligation; or, How To Stop Rape Right Now (Original Post)
redqueen
Oct 2013
OP
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)1. I made a thread with this article in GD
So far most people are positive. Only one has claimed that to do this is anti-feminist and nannying and that it's better to teach women not to drink to excess (as if we don't already know that and do that and as if that stops us from being raped. Magic anti-rape tactic, my butt!)
redqueen
(115,103 posts)2. Oops, I missed it...
I'd have linked to yours if I had, sorry.
I thought about posting it in GD but chickened out.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)3. I never do OP's in GD
Too much hostility, not enough common sense. I'm glad it got a positive response