2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary the Hawk does it again: Asked about her Wall Street ties, Clinton again invoked 9/11
By BEN NORTON
Hillary Clinton is by far the most hawkish of the Democratic presidential candidates. She supported the internationally illegal Iraq War; helped lead the NATO bombing of Libya, famously remarking We came, we saw, he died when Muammar Qadhafi was killed; oversaw the U.S. drone war, in which targets are assassinated without charge or trial; previously defended torture; and said in her 2007 campaign for president she would consider dropping nuclear bombs on militants in South Asia.
Although Clintons campaign and advocates may have tried to reduce the hawkish Freudian slip to a slip of the tongue, however, Hillary has yet again fallen back on the 9/11 attacks when asked about her ties to Wall Street.
In an interview with CBS released today, her first TV interview since the November 13 Paris attacks, Clinton defends both her hawkish positions and her closeness to Wall Street.
Host Charlie Rose asks, Have you suffered from the fact that they say you are too close to Wall Street? Has that hurt your image, in your judgement, running for president?
I have stood for a lot of regulation on big banks and on the financial services sector. I also represented New York and represented everybody from the dairy farmers to the fishermen, Clinton replied, adding, And did I help rebuild after 9/11? Yes, I did.
the rest
http://www.salon.com/2015/12/01/hillary_the_hawk_does_it_again_asked_about_her_wall_street_ties_clinton_again_invoked_911/
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Drop this stupidity from your bank of answers Hillary.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Invoking 9/11, to justify being owned by Wall Street money--was a colossal mistake on Hillary's part.
She's in a no-win situation. If she says the remark was an error or that she was misunderstood--then she looks even worse. The remark is still out there, but then she looks weak and discombobulated.
She's being asked about this and I'm sure she wishes that the issue would go away. All she can do is double down on the remark and hope that the issue dies down.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)American campaign rhetoric has hit a historical low.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Cut it out!
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Big mistake...
Even if it's all been phony baloney...
Big mistake.
9/11 SHOULDNT have anything to do with it....
But you're making it awfully alot about 9/11...
Why?
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)She took the millions of dollars in Wall Street speaking fees as a rebuke to the terrorists. Because... reasons!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)Sucks when you must represent everyone.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Verb noun oligarchy banks big money IWR exclamation points mad face. Yadda yadda. Raspberry sound.