HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2013 (Forum) » According to Nate Silver,...

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 09:38 PM

According to Nate Silver, Romney Is Losing Ground This Week

Perhaps some kind of bounce is yet to come but we aren't seeing anything close to that so far. Obama is approaching his all time high in 538's projections. I wonder if Romney is now counting on the debates

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

59 replies, 4624 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 59 replies Author Time Post
Reply According to Nate Silver, Romney Is Losing Ground This Week (Original post)
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 OP
mojo2012 Aug 2012 #1
Blue Idaho Aug 2012 #15
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #2
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #8
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #29
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #33
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #37
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #43
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #44
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #52
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #53
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #54
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #55
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #56
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 #17
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #19
TroyD Aug 2012 #47
DavidDvorkin Aug 2012 #49
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 #50
grantcart Aug 2012 #34
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 #39
grantcart Aug 2012 #46
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 #48
Lifelong Protester Aug 2012 #3
doc03 Aug 2012 #6
ailsagirl Aug 2012 #12
Lifelong Protester Aug 2012 #14
ailsagirl Aug 2012 #16
Cha Aug 2012 #22
2pooped2pop Aug 2012 #30
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2012 #45
doc03 Aug 2012 #4
Floyd_Gondolli Aug 2012 #5
doc03 Aug 2012 #7
jeff47 Aug 2012 #9
ailsagirl Aug 2012 #25
demwing Aug 2012 #31
Arkana Aug 2012 #27
ailsagirl Aug 2012 #10
Honeycombe8 Aug 2012 #11
progressoid Aug 2012 #13
Doctor Jack Aug 2012 #18
Amonester Aug 2012 #20
elleng Aug 2012 #21
davidpdx Aug 2012 #23
TroyD Aug 2012 #41
huckleberry Aug 2012 #57
davidpdx Aug 2012 #58
Marsala Aug 2012 #24
Arkana Aug 2012 #26
Iggy Aug 2012 #28
SDjack Aug 2012 #32
Brother Buzz Aug 2012 #35
speedoo Aug 2012 #36
TroyD Aug 2012 #40
Brother Buzz Aug 2012 #42
treestar Aug 2012 #38
Marsala Aug 2012 #51
thevoiceofreason Sep 2012 #59

Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:02 PM

1. Can't wait for the debates

If by some slight chance, Mitt Romney is counting on the debates, he should be careful what he wishes for.
No teleprompters during a debate. Can't take Paul Ryan, Ann Romney or any other surrogate up to the podium with him. It will be tough to remember which lie or position he stood on last week, the day before, or this morning.
So, it will be quite interesting to see how he will fair. I plan to watch all of the debates

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mojo2012 (Reply #1)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:57 PM

15. Willard's Debate Secret Weapon...

He'll be wearing... Wait for it...

Mormon Urim and Thummim seer glasses! Yes, just like Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon, Willard will be able to divine the correct debate answers with these top secret seer stones set in a lovely silver bow!

We're fucked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:18 PM

2. Obama has been slowly pulling ahead again on Intrade, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #2)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:40 PM

8. Or he was, until I posted that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #8)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:49 AM

29. I think

Last edited Thu Aug 30, 2012, 10:32 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

he was at 57% chance of winning. Then right before the convention, I think he dropped to 54. Since the convention he went up to 56 and now at 55.something.

So unless I have the wrong days, he has actually gone up from 54 pre convention to 55+ on the last day of the convention.

I am looking forward to see how it goes tomorrow, and then after our convention, then after the debates.

Up just now to 55.9 which is .3 higher than it was a little while ago.

so far, intrade doesn't show a bounce for Rmoney convention.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2pooped2pop (Reply #29)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:53 PM

33. Yes, it will be interesting to watch it during the Democratic convention

Interesting and heartening, I hope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #33)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:12 PM

37. at 56 now. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2pooped2pop (Reply #37)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:49 PM

43. 56.2!

I'm hyperventilating.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #43)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:59 PM

44. lol

I am going to be excited to see if it moves up next week after our convention.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #43)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 08:33 AM

52. 56.7 this am

Friday after the convention.

Looks good to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2pooped2pop (Reply #52)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 08:45 AM

53. 57 now. back to the week before the convention.

Last edited Fri Aug 31, 2012, 09:14 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

56.2 again. Will have to just go with this evenings closing point to judge it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #43)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 04:32 PM

54. Have you looked?

57.9

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2pooped2pop (Reply #54)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 06:44 PM

55. This is fun.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #55)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 06:55 PM

56. I was going to join and make some bets

You have to send in your driver lic. copy, 2 utility bills. You can't use a USA bank issued credit card. They will take checks but takes 10 days to clear. Then to cash out, they charge 67.00 for a check or 20 for a money wire but with another 10 and another 20 charged by the other banks it goes through.

After all that I decided to just watch. lol Am having fun with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #2)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:53 PM

17. Intrade is filled with republicans

And they are always wrong

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #17)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:43 AM

19. I have my doubts that Intrade is filled with Republicans

I do know that Intrade has a good predictive record.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavidDvorkin (Reply #19)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 05:58 PM

47. InTrade was wrong about the Supreme Court's healthcare decision

As Nate Silver says, sometimes InTrade is guilty of playing follow the leader and just following what the popular wisdom is.

They also predicted Romney would win the Colorado primary and didn't see Santorum coming.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TroyD (Reply #47)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 07:07 PM

49. No, they were not wrong

People keep saying that, but I was watching Intrade continually, and I saw the odds that the SC would overturn the ACA drop to 50% by the time the decision was made.

I'd consider that a pretty accurate call.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TroyD (Reply #47)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 07:10 PM

50. They were wrong about Perry

For awhile they had him as a shoe in to win the nomination and to become president. They also didn't see Paul Ryan becoming VP. They had Portman as the favorite. Those are some big things to get wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #17)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 01:52 PM

34. Then you should buy against them and make a mint, if "they are always wrong"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grantcart (Reply #34)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:32 PM

39. Looks like I struck a nerve

Do tell why you are so offended.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Reply #39)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 05:55 PM

46. because the "wisdom of the crowds" has been researched at the peer review macro

economic level and found to be much more reliable than opinion polls. The fundamental reason for that is that they are putting money behind their perception and not just giving a flippant opinion to a pollster.

You can learn about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wisdom_of_Crowds

You can read about predictive markets here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market



Prediction markets are championed in James Surowiecki's 2004 book The Wisdom of Crowds, Cass Sunstein's 2006 Infotopia, and How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business by Douglas Hubbard.

The research literature is collected together in the peer reviewed The Journal of Prediction Markets, edited by Leighton Vaughan Williams and published by the University of Buckingham Press. The journal was first published in 2007, and is available online and in print.

In John Brunner's 1975 science fiction story The Shockwave Rider there is a description of a prediction market that he called the Delphi Pool.

In October 2007 companies from the United States, Ireland, Austria, Germany, and Denmark formed the Prediction Market Industry Association, tasked with promoting awareness, education, and validation for prediction markets.

. . .

However, Steven Gjerstad (Purdue) in his paper "Risk Aversion, Beliefs, and Prediction Market Equilibrium," has shown that prediction market prices are very close to the mean belief of market participants if the agents are risk averse and the distribution of beliefs is spread out (as with a normal distribution, for example). Justin Wolfers (Wharton) and Eric Zitzewitz (Dartmouth) have obtained similar results, and also include some analysis of prediction market data, in their paper "Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities." In practice, the prices of binary prediction markets have proven to be closely related to actual frequencies of events in the real world.




Now you didn't hit a nerve but your comment upthread



17. Intrade is filled with republicans And they are always wrong



It is the kind of juvenile remark that you will find gets taken apart here. You didn't strike a nerve because there wasn't enough substance in your comment or your analysis to be taken seriously. You will find that you are entitled to your opinion at DU but if you start throwing out childishly inaccurate facts like "they are filled with Republicans" or that they "are always wrong", you will, more often than not find somebody who knows more about it than you and challenge any loosely offered data that is clearly not true. Next time you want to make a statement in an absolute fashion, like "they are always wrong" you better have some links to back up what you are talking about or be prepared to be taken apart.

BTW Intrade currently has the President at 56% http://www.intrade.com/v4/home/. After the Democratic convention expect it to go back to 58. If you think that they are 'always wrong' then empty your savings buy Romney and make a bundle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grantcart (Reply #46)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 07:00 PM

48. Well someone needs a hug

Last edited Thu Aug 30, 2012, 07:06 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

I wasn't aware you were so passionate about gambling. I was wrong to suggest that the people on intrade are not always correct in their predictions. They are the modern day Oracles of Olympia. And repubicans don't even know about the website. Its is 100% democrats. Getting into intrade is like entering Hogwarts. Only liberals can find the way in.

Just don't stab me, alright?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:23 PM

3. Romney is not a good debater.

Unless he can bet President Obama $10,000 on some question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lifelong Protester (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:27 PM

6. I heard Romney is a masterdebater n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lifelong Protester (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:51 PM

12. I heard one of the talking heads say Nitt was a very focused debater

Can't remember who. I guess I blocked it out of my mind until now.

Obama has the truth going for him. Nitt has to defend a pack of lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ailsagirl (Reply #12)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:56 PM

14. Is the talking head basing that opinion on the debates

in the primaries??? The guy on SNL did better than him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lifelong Protester (Reply #14)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:00 PM

16. It might have been Julian Epstein but I can't really say for sure

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ailsagirl (Reply #12)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 02:31 AM

22. willard mitt is definitely focused on

which lie he's going to tell next.

I can't wait until Pres Obama Mopped the Floor with him and drinks his milkshake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ailsagirl (Reply #12)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:52 AM

30. Obama not only has the truth

He has integrity going for him. He has charisma going for him. Romney has none of either. I think Obama is going to make any sane person know who to vote for.

We know the repigs are not sane, so they will still vote for Mittfaced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ailsagirl (Reply #12)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 05:16 PM

45. Nitt has a thin skin.

Remember his exchange with Rick Perry?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:24 PM

4. What is his track record for predicting the winner? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to doc03 (Reply #4)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:25 PM

5. He was very accurate in 2008

But that didn't take a genius. I like his stuff. Very fact based and rational.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Floyd_Gondolli (Reply #5)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:39 PM

7. It worries me when I keep seeing all those polls being quoted in

the media that show it a dead heat or Romney ahead. I guess it is to their best interest to make it a horse race
for ratings. At least I hope that is what is happening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to doc03 (Reply #7)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:47 PM

9. When they want to make it seem close, they use the popular vote

But as we all learned really well in 2000, we don't elect via popular vote.

90% of Utah residents voting for Romney helps the popular vote. But it wins the same 5 electoral votes as 51%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to doc03 (Reply #7)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:37 AM

25. If I hear about another 'dead heat' poll, I'll scream!

I question their veracity--I really do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to doc03 (Reply #7)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:59 AM

31. what national or swing state polls show RMoney ahead?

Rasmussen is the only one that does so consistently, and even Raz had Obama a point ahead yesterday

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to doc03 (Reply #4)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:42 AM

27. He predicted 48 of 50 states correctly.

Missed on Indiana and Missouri--gave Missouri narrowly to Obama and Indiana narrowly to McCain.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:50 PM

10. Cool!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:51 PM

11. There hasn't been enough time, though, it seems.

The article seems to indicate the bounce comes in the time period after the convention and before the next party's convention. And he's not sure there's a correlation to who wins the election ultimately.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 10:51 PM

13. I predict the smallest bounce in history.

I think the Repubs have a bigger enthusiasm problem than the media says we do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Wed Aug 29, 2012, 11:55 PM

18. The RCP average right now is 1.1 points for obama

In 2008, McCain got to +4 or so after the convention. My biggest hope right now is that it never goes positive for Romney.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:47 AM

20. Robmehood's gonna be called on his lies by the President so bad...

that he's gonna want to chicken-out to France after the first one!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 01:43 AM

21. Good to hear.

Not surprised, but he hasn't 'appeared' yet. Let's see tomorrow, weekend, and next week. Both parties will, I assume, be on the road then, REALLY campaigning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 06:30 AM

23. Off-Topic question

Sorry for asking....

Does anyone know if the NY Times has been enforcing the rule that you can only go to the website 10X a month and does that apply to NS's blog?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #23)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:34 PM

41. I think the NY Times is restricting non-subscribers to 10 articles per month, yes N/T

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #23)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 07:16 PM

57. Go to NYT via Google News

That's what I've been doing and it's working!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to huckleberry (Reply #57)

Fri Aug 31, 2012, 10:49 PM

58. Thanks for the tip

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 06:52 AM

24. Nate's model takes convention bounces into account, and penalizes if there isn't one

So any bounce Romney gets will have its effect on Romney's winning percentage blunted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:41 AM

26. I'm really glad that Nate is hewing closer to the numbers game.

He's incredibly good at it.

What he sucks at, however, is offering his political opinion. I don't want him to become the 2012 version of Chuck Todd--numbers wizard turned toady pundit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:46 AM

28. OF COURSE He's Losing Ground

 

David Brooks and other pro-GOP bobbleheads have been saying the past few weeks, "well, the voters
are just now starting to pay attention to the election/candidates..."

right.. and as they see and hear Rmoney, they don't like it.

why? Obv because he's an uber-wealthy giant-ass phony of the worst sort. he and his princess wife are
desperately attempting to sell themselves as "normal" people.. "just like you guys".

what a Load. the people just starting to pay attention are not buying it.

this election reminds me of 1996-- when the GOP put up the BORING, hapless Bob Dole as their
pathetic candidate. the rest is history; he got his ass kicked by Clinton.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 09:06 AM

32. rMoney and Obama should have to debate nude. That way,

rMoney can't wear the secret radio receiver that Bush used in his debates. Rove was on the transmitter, giving Bush the "answers".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 02:18 PM

35. Smart money listens to the bookies: Here's what U.K. bookies are saying about the presidential race

It's illegal to wager on elections in the U.S. -- but in Great Britain, anything goes. Here's what U.K. bookies are saying about the presidential race.

Do you think you know who'll win? The U.K. bookies now heavily favor Obama: He's quoted at 2/5, compared with 15/8 for Romney. Put another way, they currently give Obama a roughly 70% chance of winning, against 35% for Romney. (Those odds have moved sharply towards Obama in recent weeks, following Romney's missteps, although the polls in the U.S. don't reflect that.)


http://www.smartmoney.com/invest/strategies/romney-vs-obama-the-oddsmakers-weigh-in-1344372024237/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #35)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:11 PM

36. Nate Silver's %'s are exactly the same as the UK bookies.

70% Obama.

I guess that's good news, but we still have a long way to go.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #35)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:32 PM

40. How come they don't add up to 100% like InTrade?

they currently give Obama a roughly 70% chance of winning, against 35% for Romney.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TroyD (Reply #40)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:46 PM

42. Fuzzy math

Bookies need to make a profit, don't you know?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 03:26 PM

38. Remember in 2008 how they got a convention bounce

Due to the Failin' excitement. They were ahead in the polls for awhile.

This time they can't even do that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to treestar (Reply #38)

Thu Aug 30, 2012, 08:07 PM

51. Don't jump the gun

In 2008, the bump wasn't visible until after the convention ended, and it brought two weeks of terror for us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor Jack (Original post)

Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:40 AM

59. Obama chance of winning 72% as of 9/1/12 in the morning

Nate now has it at the highest it has been in weeks - up 3.6% since 8/24.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread