Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:43 PM Nov 2015

Hamburger vs Steak

Most people would rather have a filet mignon but many can only rarely eat it.

So they settle on a hamburger and then have all sorts of points to explain how a hamburger is good for you.

1. It is less chewy
2. It can be seasoned much better
3. It has more nutrients
4. It is tastier because it has various cuts of meat
5. It is easier for left-handed people to eat
6. It has more Vitamin B-12
7. One cannot choke on a hamburger etc. etc.

All the people proclaiming the above attributes would take a filet mignon if offered for free in a heartbeat but as long as the filet remains elusive, they will sing praises of the hamburger.

Let me connect. At the beginning of the primary discussions, no one mentioned Bernie. Elizabeth Warren was all the rage. Multiple signature lines and Avatars promoting Elizabeth Warren. She was and remains the filet.

As Senator Warren declined to run, there was a period when people wondered if they would go hungry without the steak.

Then, on the horizon, appeared the hamburger ... I mean... Senator Sanders and there was a feeding frenzy and all the posts appeared about how the hamburger is so much better. Many a signature line with Senator Warren remain ... evidencing the fact that she is the first choice.

So my dear fellow democrats who are promoting Senator Sanders, deep down inside, you know he is just a fallback choice and shall always remain a hamburger because what you really crave is not available and will never be available this cycle.

While proclaiming honesty, I doubt anyone has the openness to post that Bernie is no where as good as Senator Warren will never be as good as Senator Warren and that is all he is -- a second choice fallback.

79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hamburger vs Steak (Original Post) cosmicone Nov 2015 OP
I never saw Warren, the former Republican, as preferred to Bernie, or really Hillary randys1 Nov 2015 #1
The logic I learned in college is different from yours. n/t Wilms Nov 2015 #2
That's because the logic you learned in college did not start with the conclusion and work backwards Fumesucker Nov 2015 #3
This PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #19
Filet Mignon is overrated. I like a rib eye. immoderate Nov 2015 #4
+1 UglyGreed Nov 2015 #13
... Kali Nov 2015 #31
That's a lot of words to claim only that most Sanders supporters would prefer Warren. Vattel Nov 2015 #5
Hamburger still beats bologna. RGinNJ Nov 2015 #6
Win. n/t whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #22
winner winner chicken dinner think Nov 2015 #28
Haven't finished reading the thread, but, after I do, you may well be my thread winner. merrily Nov 2015 #41
Thank You for the kind words. RGinNJ Nov 2015 #49
You're more than welcome. You and Reformist2 (Reply 25) made me laugh. merrily Nov 2015 #50
*Ding!* Win! Hydra Nov 2015 #61
Bingo! RiverLover Nov 2015 #69
I was going to say hotdog DVRacer Nov 2015 #79
I like both Warren and Sanders... cascadiance Nov 2015 #7
I really see Bernie as the magnet pulling HRC to the left as the Wall Streeter are trying to pull LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #8
I always wonder whether Warren is kicking herself firebrand80 Nov 2015 #9
SHe's probably saying "Thank God. Life's too short to put up with that kind of crap." Armstead Nov 2015 #29
That's a false equivalence. Fearless Nov 2015 #10
I'd order a good Bacon Cheeseburger over a middling Chateaubriand, anyday. leveymg Nov 2015 #11
LOL! merrily Nov 2015 #42
i read the last line like this retrowire Nov 2015 #12
cosmic one is our hero!! RobertEarl Nov 2015 #14
Nope. If it was Sanders vs Warren, I'd still vote Sanders. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #15
Wouldn't that be something Mnpaul Nov 2015 #23
That's an interesting metaphor you're using; it's the same one the Clinton's used closeupready Nov 2015 #16
catfood commission early draft? Mnpaul Nov 2015 #24
If Warren is Filet, and Bernie is Hamburger... bobbobbins01 Nov 2015 #17
Grade F. Circus animals and filler. winter is coming Nov 2015 #26
I'm a burger and beer guy myself, personally. HerbChestnut Nov 2015 #18
Hillary is like the chop steak TSIAS Nov 2015 #20
If that's true, that implies HRC is a turkey burger. aikoaiko Nov 2015 #21
If Warren is steak and Bernie is hamburger, I know what that makes Hillary... mystery meat! reformist2 Nov 2015 #25
LOL! RGinNJ (Reply 6) said bologna. You both made me laugh. Thanks. merrily Nov 2015 #51
You can't always get what you want. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #27
Please see Reply 43. merrily Nov 2015 #44
I remember the furor over the draft Warren before Sanders stepped up. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #47
I have no idea what your post says, but it probably doesn't negate my Reply 43. merrily Nov 2015 #48
Edited my response above. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #52
O! My prophetic soul. Your reply 47 does not negate my Reply 43. The vast majority of posts merrily Nov 2015 #55
Wow, that analogy is lousy. It's not a hamburger versus steak proposition. winter is coming Nov 2015 #30
And of Warren had dared to challenge Clinton Inc. (TM) you'd be saying the exact opposite Armstead Nov 2015 #32
I never preferred Warren to Sanders. There, you've made me out myself to all my Warren fan friends merrily Nov 2015 #33
That's the exact order I would use to list them. Cassiopeia Nov 2015 #37
So, you're outing yourself as well? The things we do for Sanders. merrily Nov 2015 #38
I guess so. Cassiopeia Nov 2015 #39
Don't know about her. Her husband said his Prof., Carroll Quigley, was one of the two biggest merrily Nov 2015 #40
I still love ya merrily! RiverLover Nov 2015 #70
Awww, RiverLover, you are so kind. I love you, too. merrily Nov 2015 #73
I agree; seems the same people who were going on about Warren treestar Nov 2015 #34
Even though most people on this thread say they prefer Sanders to Warren. merrily Nov 2015 #43
I notice only popular meats. Poor Hillary didn't even make the menu. Autumn Nov 2015 #35
Sanders was my first choice. Cassiopeia Nov 2015 #36
This thread is offensive to Vegetarian Democrats... brooklynite Nov 2015 #45
In this analogy, Republican candidates are soylent green? aidbo Nov 2015 #46
Meh... We obviously travel in different hemispheres. nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #53
A hamburger is still much better than a shit sandwich n/t Scootaloo Nov 2015 #54
Honest question: Where does Clinton fit into this scenario? Raine1967 Nov 2015 #56
canned meat product ibegurpard Nov 2015 #58
That is really kinda mean. Raine1967 Nov 2015 #63
Clinton ain't even hamburger ibegurpard Nov 2015 #57
whatever the differences between sanders and warren, restorefreedom Nov 2015 #59
And Hillary is even less preferable to many of those people than Sanders is. Warren DeMontague Nov 2015 #60
Red meat causes cancer Kalidurga Nov 2015 #62
A Hillary Clinton presidency will be like sitting in a restaurant waiting-and-waiting Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #64
Then, you find out that, not only are you not getting your meal, but you are paying for theirs. merrily Nov 2015 #65
I laughed, but that's sadly perfect! polly7 Nov 2015 #68
Why do I sense that this thread did not go as cosmicone assumed? merrily Nov 2015 #78
LOL (NT) Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #77
Hamburger vs steak. SamKnause Nov 2015 #66
A lot of good discussion can come from your op. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #67
Pure bullshit. LWolf Nov 2015 #71
Many of them are not pro-Bernie, so much as anti-Hillary... SidDithers Nov 2015 #72
That was profound ibegurpard Nov 2015 #74
Sorry it's not on the level of "canned meat product"... SidDithers Nov 2015 #75
I guess it does not occur to you, but... HassleCat Nov 2015 #76

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. I never saw Warren, the former Republican, as preferred to Bernie, or really Hillary
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:47 PM
Nov 2015

for that matter.

I like her, but no, she never was the filet mignon to me.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. That's because the logic you learned in college did not start with the conclusion and work backwards
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:51 PM
Nov 2015

Kali

(55,007 posts)
31. ...
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:40 PM
Nov 2015



I suppose one could go into an amateur psych analysis about hamburger for regular middle class people and fillet for rich elites if one really wanted to point out the possibly subliminal Freudian choices going on in the OP but that would be silly...

and yeah, anybody that appreciates good steak chooses bone-in ribeye, grilled over mesquite especially.
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
5. That's a lot of words to claim only that most Sanders supporters would prefer Warren.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:53 PM
Nov 2015

I would prefer Sanders because he seems less hawkish and more generally progressive. It would be a tough choice, though, because unlike Sanders or Clinton or O'Malley, Warren has real serious expertise on economic issues and that might make her more effective on those kind of issues.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
41. Haven't finished reading the thread, but, after I do, you may well be my thread winner.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:27 PM
Nov 2015

Thanks for posting.

DVRacer

(707 posts)
79. I was going to say hotdog
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 04:28 PM
Nov 2015

But I think you are absolutely on the right track with that analogy. Why would we want a mushy barely classified meat product when at least we can have a hamburger and a USDA PRIME one at that! I will be glad to eat my hamburger given the alternative is a hotdog or bologna.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
7. I like both Warren and Sanders...
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:53 PM
Nov 2015

My major reason for supporting Warren as my first choice earlier, is that it would serve to make it that much harder for the media and others to emphasize "identity politics" in a primary battle versus Clinton that we had so much of in the last election and at times we've had in this election too instead of focusing on the issues. Bernie's at least through a strong effort on his part has made a huge effort to direct those talking to him to focus on issues, which is what SHOULD be how we judge the candidates we are voting for.

Both of them are filet mignon, if you are going to use that metaphor, compared to the other candidates. Though that implies they are also a "rich person"'s plate too. I want someone that can provide us a great steak or other very enjoyable and healthy food for that matter that everyone can afford, not just the wealthy that our corrupt country tries to serve more today.

LiberalArkie

(15,713 posts)
8. I really see Bernie as the magnet pulling HRC to the left as the Wall Streeter are trying to pull
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:54 PM
Nov 2015

her to the right. HRC started with certain ideas from associating with her crowd. She is now associating with some different people and her views are being more refined. This is what happens. This is the way it should work.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
9. I always wonder whether Warren is kicking herself
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:58 PM
Nov 2015

If her reason for not running was that she didn't think she could take down Hillary, then she might be looking at what Bernie is doing despite his disadvantages and thinking she could be pulling at least 40% of Dems right now.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
11. I'd order a good Bacon Cheeseburger over a middling Chateaubriand, anyday.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:16 PM
Nov 2015

Your metaphor is dry, tasteless and way overdone.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
12. i read the last line like this
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:20 PM
Nov 2015

"HES JUST A PLAN B! HE DOESNT REALLY MEAN ANYTHING TO YOOOUUU!!! WHY DONT YOU CHOOSE THE STEAK THAT IS HILLAAARRRRYYYY"

Ahem, I learned about Liz warren after bernie. lol

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
14. cosmic one is our hero!!
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 03:23 PM
Nov 2015

Where would we be if we didn't have the cosmic one telling us what to think?

why we'd be lost!!!

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
23. Wouldn't that be something
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:28 PM
Nov 2015

Having both on the ticket and having to decide between the two. It would make for interesting debates as well.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
16. That's an interesting metaphor you're using; it's the same one the Clinton's used
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 05:15 PM
Nov 2015

in helping to argue why a lower standard of living in the US wouldn't ultimately matter (in the wake the passage of NAFTA or outsourcing US jobs), because "people will switch from steak to hamburger".

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
17. If Warren is Filet, and Bernie is Hamburger...
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 05:34 PM
Nov 2015

I don't even want to speculate what that makes Hillary. Not fit for human consumption?

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
26. Grade F. Circus animals and filler.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:35 PM
Nov 2015

That's a joke from The Simpsons, before anyone starts having a hissy fit.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
48. I have no idea what your post says, but it probably doesn't negate my Reply 43.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:47 PM
Nov 2015
I remember the for or her over draft Warren before Sanders stepped up.

The answered that best.


What does that mean?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
52. Edited my response above.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:56 PM
Nov 2015

My phone is not an ideal medium.

Before Sanders, the progressives solidified around Warren. She chose not to run, and most of that demographic moved to Sanders.

So I posted my link to the Rolling Stones.

They did not get what they wanted. Sanders appears to fill the progressive need for a revolutionary candidate.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
55. O! My prophetic soul. Your reply 47 does not negate my Reply 43. The vast majority of posts
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:00 AM
Nov 2015

on this thread from Bernie supporters say he was their first choice.

As for me, I didn't think there was a prayer he would run, so, yes, I "coalesced" around Warren in vast preference to anointing Hillary. Still, Sanders was my first choice. See my Reply 33.

Problem with your reply and treestar's is that they ignore what Bernie supporters posted on this thread about the order of their preferences, which is what the OP is about, after all.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
30. Wow, that analogy is lousy. It's not a hamburger versus steak proposition.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:39 PM
Nov 2015

Warren versus Sanders is more like "people who want steak discover that steakhouse A isn't open, so they move along to steakhouse B". Maybe steakhouse A is more conveniently located, or has better desserts, but they're still quite happy to be getting a steak at steakhouse B.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
32. And of Warren had dared to challenge Clinton Inc. (TM) you'd be saying the exact opposite
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:41 PM
Nov 2015

"Yes we all know you are pretending to like Warren. But you really would have preferred that Sanders run."

merrily

(45,251 posts)
33. I never preferred Warren to Sanders. There, you've made me out myself to all my Warren fan friends
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 09:41 PM
Nov 2015

on DU for the very first time. I hope you're happy.

I hoped Warren would run because I assumed there was not a prayer that Sanders would run. I was ecstatic to be proven wrong.

For me, Sanders is restaurant quality filet mignon, Warren is prime rib, O'Malley is sirloin and I've crossed Hillary off my menu.

Now, I have to go unclog my virtual arteries.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
39. I guess so.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:15 PM
Nov 2015

This country needs radical change to correct the radical insanity of the last 3 decades.

I don't believe Hillary even desires radical change.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
40. Don't know about her. Her husband said his Prof., Carroll Quigley, was one of the two biggest
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:25 PM
Nov 2015

influences on his life (the other he cited being JFK). Quigley posited that certainty was best for financial markets. Therefore, it was best for financial markets that differences between Presidential administrations be minimal. Ergo, Democrats and Republicans being a lot like each other was good for financial markets.

Since then, our economy has become less dependent on manufacturing and even more dependent on things like investing.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
34. I agree; seems the same people who were going on about Warren
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 10:32 PM
Nov 2015

and were anti-Hillary already then jumped on the BS wagon when it came into being.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
43. Even though most people on this thread say they prefer Sanders to Warren.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 11:32 PM
Nov 2015

Bravo! Never let facts get in your way!

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
36. Sanders was my first choice.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 10:46 PM
Nov 2015

We need Warren right where she's at to help Sanders wrestle control of this country away from the plutocrats.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
56. Honest question: Where does Clinton fit into this scenario?
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:02 AM
Nov 2015

She, like Warren and Sanders was always part of the menu.

And where would one put O'Malley on said menu?

Seriously, if we are gonna compare candidates that are and are not running as entrees, where do the others fit in? Are they all cattle?





restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
59. whatever the differences between sanders and warren,
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:17 AM
Nov 2015

i was hoping bernie would run before he even announced. and that is the truth. he is not "hamburger" to me. and if they were both in the primary i would still vote for bernie as much as i like warren

who is the steak that clinton is the hamburger to? because she is NOT the "steak progressive" for sure

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
60. And Hillary is even less preferable to many of those people than Sanders is.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:23 AM
Nov 2015

So--- you're arguing that those presumably settling for something less than ideal should settle for something they want even less than that, because....


ah.....


hmmmm....


errrrr....


ahhhh....



oh, wait.... you're not trying to make an actual logical point, just poking Sanders supporters because it's fun! derp

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
64. A Hillary Clinton presidency will be like sitting in a restaurant waiting-and-waiting
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 01:05 AM
Nov 2015

...for your meal while Wall St executives stuff their faces around you.


merrily

(45,251 posts)
65. Then, you find out that, not only are you not getting your meal, but you are paying for theirs.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 01:27 AM
Nov 2015

And you get to bus tables....as an unpaid intern.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
78. Why do I sense that this thread did not go as cosmicone assumed?
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 02:17 PM
Nov 2015

Probably just my imagination (runnin' away with me).

SamKnause

(13,091 posts)
66. Hamburger vs steak.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 07:06 AM
Nov 2015

Most people would rather have a filet mignon ???

I prefer a burger (no bun) made from ground round or ground sirlion. 92% lean/8% fat.

I like a big patty with a baked potato, cottage cheese, applesauce, and fresh tomato.

If I were going to eat steak, filet mignon is the only steak I would eat.

I don't like fat or bone so rib eyes and t-bones are out.

Bernie is not my fallback choice.

Bernie has always been my first choice.

I would be very pleased with Elizabeth as well.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
67. A lot of good discussion can come from your op.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 07:16 AM
Nov 2015

The second choice over that of a recent republican really shows how he has become idealized and that its ABBC. We have also reached a point where Kucinich isn't carrying the flag for the group in our party who leans more left. When all is said and done I believe Sanders will pull around the same support as Kucinich in the primary. By the time the votes roll around all of the libertarians, isolationists, and Paul supporters will have gone back to the party they always support. You can already see the novelty aspect wearing thin.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
71. Pure bullshit.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:24 AM
Nov 2015

Deep down inside, while I appreciate Warren, I was never pushing her to run.

I simply wanted a non-neo-liberal candidate to support and nominate. I would have been happy with ANY non-neo-liberal...and I said so repeatedly.

Sanders is the one who stepped forward, so he's got my support.

The bottom line? I won't support nor vote for a neo-liberal. Period.

Neo-liberals: dlc, centrist, 3rd way, "new democrat" or whatever other label they want to give themselves, are the soylent green of the Democratic Party.

I'll stick with authentic, home-grown, grass-roots food.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
76. I guess it does not occur to you, but...
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:06 PM
Nov 2015

By describing the situation with Elizabeth Warren, you don't just put Sanders into the "fallback" or "Plan B" position, but Clinton as well. So why should we eat the Clinton hamburger instead of the Sanders or O'Malley hamburger?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hamburger vs Steak