Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

msrizzo

(796 posts)
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:22 PM Nov 2015

WAPO: League of Conservation Voters to Endorse Hillary Clinton

League of Conservation Voters to Endorse Hillary Clinton

The League of Conservation Voters Action Fund on Monday intends to endorse Hillary Rodham Clinton, the first time in three decades it has endorsed a presidential candidate before a single primary vote has been cast.

The decision to back Clinton over two Democratic rivals with equally strong, if not stronger, liberal environmental records shows the extent to which some environmentalists are concerned the Obama administration’s policies could be rolled back under a Republican president. The group’s president, Gene Karpin­ski, said it needs to activate volunteers and donors early to make sure Clinton is strongly positioned for the general election.

The LCV Action Fund picked Clinton over Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) and former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley because “the stakes are so high” and Clinton “has proved she’s an effective leader who can stand up to the big polluters and push forward an aggressive plan to tackle climate change,” Karpin­ski said.

More at https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/league-of-conservation-voters-action-fund-to-endorse-clinton/2015/11/08/4020cc9c-862d-11e5-be39-0034bb576eee_story.html
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WAPO: League of Conservation Voters to Endorse Hillary Clinton (Original Post) msrizzo Nov 2015 OP
. RandySF Nov 2015 #1
Third Wayers nt firebrand80 Nov 2015 #2
Yeah, but Conservation is so close to Conservative, so of course they endorsed her. onehandle Nov 2015 #3
I read it first as Conservative arikara Nov 2015 #33
I see petitions DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #4
Honk Honk! JaneyVee Nov 2015 #5
beat me to it. iandhr Nov 2015 #28
This is getting embarrassing. It's actually a sign of weakness, that everyone's lining up so early. reformist2 Nov 2015 #6
Yep, they are trying to ram her down voters' throats. askew Nov 2015 #12
So dramatic! LuvLoogie Nov 2015 #21
Reformist: SCantiGOP Nov 2015 #27
K&R nt stevenleser Nov 2015 #7
Wow, that is moronic. askew Nov 2015 #8
She had one 8 years ago and she has a senate record. stevenleser Nov 2015 #9
That's absurd. askew Nov 2015 #11
I think LCV & Grist probably both know what they are talking about. stevenleser Nov 2015 #14
What's bigger than a bus? ismnotwasm Nov 2015 #24
The head is a close friend and ally of Clinton Armstead Nov 2015 #56
As cynical as it may be I have to agree with you. HerbChestnut Nov 2015 #15
Yeah, there is no environmental justification for this endorsement. askew Nov 2015 #18
This,,,, Armstead Nov 2015 #57
Like the announcement says, the stakes (losing to GOPers) are high. Losing is too great a risk. Hoyt Nov 2015 #16
I agree. MBS Nov 2015 #62
K & R Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #10
Why would a legitimate conservation group endorse the Queen of Fracking? Scuba Nov 2015 #13
They know a good strong woman who will get good things done for the US. riversedge Nov 2015 #17
Keep Dreaming The Impossible Dream - The People Know Better cantbeserious Nov 2015 #25
Hillary's way ahead.. yes the people know better and agree with the League of Conservation Voters. Cha Nov 2015 #38
And.... Armstead Nov 2015 #58
Cronyism. askew Nov 2015 #19
As they said, the risk of going backwards if Sanders is nominee is too great. Hoyt Nov 2015 #20
She's a Clinton crony Armstead Nov 2015 #36
That's for certain. RiverLover Nov 2015 #44
Because its head is a Clinton Political Ally -- This is just a political thing Armstead Nov 2015 #37
Having a personal connection with Browner is a good thing. oasis Nov 2015 #46
Not saying it's wrong Armstead Nov 2015 #54
Holy moly that's a big one ismnotwasm Nov 2015 #22
One Wonders What The Bribe Was cantbeserious Nov 2015 #23
I'm the first to say that Hillary is her own person. msrizzo Nov 2015 #26
Great News for HRC & reflects the outstanding Leader she will be as President. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #29
DU rec...nt SidDithers Nov 2015 #30
At first I thought that the tittle said: BeanMusical Nov 2015 #31
The stakes are so fucking high you endorse the candidate who is guaranteed to protect onecaliberal Nov 2015 #32
Maybe they don't think it at all... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #52
Foolish. nt hay rick Nov 2015 #34
Not an unbiased endorsement. Carol Browner. A Clinton Insider. Armstead Nov 2015 #35
Ah, cronyism. askew Nov 2015 #39
Being well connected is a plus in the real world. (eom) oasis Nov 2015 #47
This is so freaking Awesome.. I don't care how BS fans try to throw LCV under the bus. Cha Nov 2015 #40
Nice Cherry Blossom Pic Cha!!! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #53
Yeah, nice pic they chose.. I love Cherry Blossoms in Spring, VR! Cha Nov 2015 #59
Congrats to Hillary and her Team. riversedge Nov 2015 #41
I must have missed where we voted on this. RiverLover Nov 2015 #42
"The group’s president, Gene Karpin­ski, said it needs to activate volunteers and donors early to Cha Nov 2015 #43
Is the League of Conservation Voters .. cannabis_flower Nov 2015 #45
Why don't you look it up and tell us? msrizzo Nov 2015 #48
There was a thread cannabis_flower Nov 2015 #49
This is the one cannabis_flower Nov 2015 #50
Thanks. msrizzo Nov 2015 #51
Yeah, which is why.. cannabis_flower Nov 2015 #60
League is run by a close froend and political ally of Clinton Armstead Nov 2015 #55
They know what they're doing.. they see the Big Picture. They know what the repubs are capable of. Cha Nov 2015 #61

arikara

(5,562 posts)
33. I read it first as Conservative
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 01:00 AM
Nov 2015

and chuckled to myself. Then I realized it was Conservation. Not so funny any more, especially after just reading this one.

How Hillary Clinton’s State Department Sold Fracking to the World

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251783865

askew

(1,464 posts)
12. Yep, they are trying to ram her down voters' throats.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:35 PM
Nov 2015

They'd be happy if she goes through the whole primary process without giving us concrete policy platforms on anything. She is running a pretty vapid campaign and hope voters are too stupid to notice.

askew

(1,464 posts)
8. Wow, that is moronic.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:28 PM
Nov 2015

She hasn't even published a full climate change platform yet. O'Malley has the best climate change platform and he has done more for environmental concerns than Hillary or Sanders.

How are they going to hold Hillary accountable, when they endorse her before she even lays out her environmental agenda. Just shameful. This makes it all about cronyism and not about the cause they are supposed to care about.

askew

(1,464 posts)
11. That's absurd.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:33 PM
Nov 2015

She's flip-flopped on her Senate record and her past platforms on issue after issue. You can't take anything she said in the past as something she believes now.

Also, her campaign platform from 2008 is significantly weaker than both Sanders and O'Malley.

The only reason for this endorsement is cronyism.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
14. I think LCV & Grist probably both know what they are talking about.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:37 PM
Nov 2015

In any case they will have good company under the bus.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
15. As cynical as it may be I have to agree with you.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:37 PM
Nov 2015

The WP article does a pretty good job of listing the reasons they *shouldn't* have endorsed her, especially considering, like you said, Sanders and O'Malley have much better environmental proposals than she does. This is an extremely disappointing endorsement for many reasons.

askew

(1,464 posts)
18. Yeah, there is no environmental justification for this endorsement.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:42 PM
Nov 2015

It undermines their cause and would make me take them less seriously if I was a donor to that group. Hillary has never been great on environmental issues (much like Bill) and there was zero harm in waiting until she put out a full environmental platform. The only reason to do it is to try to end the primary process before voting begins.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
16. Like the announcement says, the stakes (losing to GOPers) are high. Losing is too great a risk.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:39 PM
Nov 2015

MBS

(9,688 posts)
62. I agree.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 06:11 AM
Nov 2015

Last edited Tue Nov 10, 2015, 08:23 AM - Edit history (1)

I could easily see, and would support, LCV endorsement in the GE (assuming that she is the Dem nominee), since ALL Dem nominees outshine all Republican nominees on environmental and conservation issues; but endorsement in the primary election is puzzling and premature, at best - and, honestly, also unearned - especially given the fact that O'Malley and Sanders have better voting records and/or stronger plans than HRC.
Earlier Dem presidential candidates endorsed by LCV in earlier primaries, such as John Kerry and Al Gore, had several decades of strong commitment to environmental issues before announcing their candidacies for the presidency. HRC does not have that kind of record.

Cha

(296,812 posts)
38. Hillary's way ahead.. yes the people know better and agree with the League of Conservation Voters.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:18 AM
Nov 2015

askew

(1,464 posts)
19. Cronyism.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:44 PM
Nov 2015

It's another cynical endorsement by Hillary's team. I find it a bit funny because it just isn't working. No one is buying this BS outside her supporters.

O'Malley has the best record of environmental accomplishments of all the candidates and the best climate change platform.

It weakens their leverage if they endorse the candidate with the weakest environmental record who can't even be bothered to put out a full climate change platform.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
20. As they said, the risk of going backwards if Sanders is nominee is too great.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 10:45 PM
Nov 2015

I also suspect Clinton has made some serious commitments.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
37. Because its head is a Clinton Political Ally -- This is just a political thing
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 01:25 AM
Nov 2015

Carol Browner (See my post below)

oasis

(49,326 posts)
46. Having a personal connection with Browner is a good thing.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 04:21 PM
Nov 2015

It will eliminate a ton of red tape when it comes to policy proposals.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
54. Not saying it's wrong
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 08:51 PM
Nov 2015

But it should be clarified that it's a friend and political ally of Clinton, not just some environmental organization without a dog in the hunt.

msrizzo

(796 posts)
26. I'm the first to say that Hillary is her own person.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 11:01 PM
Nov 2015

But I have to push back on claims that the Clinton administration didn't have a good environmental record. And hello, Al Gore?

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/07/17/2314341/epa-building-renamed-after-bill-clinton-to-recognize-his-administrations-environmental-record/

Not saying that what Bill did is a reason to endorse Hillary, but the conventional wisdom among some folks today that Bill Clinton was the worst president in the history of the world is just wrong.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
29. Great News for HRC & reflects the outstanding Leader she will be as President.
Sun Nov 8, 2015, 11:16 PM
Nov 2015

She listens & she hears the concerns and engaged them in contributing to a solution.
She doesn't have to shout her message nor run a smear campaign to have a place in this race.
She hears the concerns & with her brilliant knowlege of policy & diplomacy, will see that their concerns will not be forgotten.
She engages those concerned about a critical issue, in also finding a solution.

This is why she has the endorsements she does.

She's not shouting her message in anyones face.

That is a great leader
HRC 2016

onecaliberal

(32,777 posts)
32. The stakes are so fucking high you endorse the candidate who is guaranteed to protect
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 12:52 AM
Nov 2015

Her corporate donars. They must think we are complete idiots.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
35. Not an unbiased endorsement. Carol Browner. A Clinton Insider.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 01:22 AM
Nov 2015

Carol Browner - Chair of League ..... A good environmentalist, but not exactly unbiased. Clinton Crony. Member of Clinton and Obama administrations....Center for American Progress

Obama's director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy in the Obama administration from 2009 to 2011. Browner previously served as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) during the Clinton administration from 1993 to 2001.


In the 2008 presidential election, she was a strong supporter of Hillary Rodham Clinton's bid for the Democratic nomination.[8] After Clinton lost her bid, Browner campaigned for Barack Obama in several battleground states and in League of Conservation Voters events.[8]


After the Clinton administration, Browner became a founding member of the Albright Group, a "global strategy group" headed by former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

But...
Until summer 2008 she was a member of Socialist International's Commission for a Sustainable World Society,[61][62][63] although the commission's web site still had her listed as a member in January 2009.

Cha

(296,812 posts)
40. This is so freaking Awesome.. I don't care how BS fans try to throw LCV under the bus.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 02:24 AM
Nov 2015




LCV works to turn environmental values into national, state and local priorities. LCV, in collaboration with our state LCV partners, advocates for sound environmental laws and policies, holds elected officials accountable for their votes and actions, and elects pro-environment candidates who will champion our priority issues.

http://www.lcv.org/about/mission/

Good job, msrizzo!

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
42. I must have missed where we voted on this.
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 07:39 AM
Nov 2015

This must be how union members feel when leadership makes a decision without input from members.

Cha

(296,812 posts)
43. "The group’s president, Gene Karpin­ski, said it needs to activate volunteers and donors early to
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 08:43 AM
Nov 2015
sure Clinton is strongly positioned for the general election."

YES!!

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
45. Is the League of Conservation Voters ..
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 04:08 PM
Nov 2015

a recipient of funds from the Clinton Foundation? Just wondering? If so, why would they endorse Bernie if it might be killing the golden goose?

msrizzo

(796 posts)
48. Why don't you look it up and tell us?
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 04:35 PM
Nov 2015

I don't know who they fund off the top of my head so I can't help you.

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
49. There was a thread
Mon Nov 9, 2015, 04:49 PM
Nov 2015

that showed a list of some of the organizations and it wasn't there, but then someone downthread said something about them so I thought probably but couldn't find where they got the list from.

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
60. Yeah, which is why..
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 12:08 AM
Nov 2015

I wonder where they got the list, or is this something that the Clinton campaign put out and there isn't a link.

Cha

(296,812 posts)
61. They know what they're doing.. they see the Big Picture. They know what the repubs are capable of.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 05:36 AM
Nov 2015

Hillary is going to win and they're need to get started on this yesterday.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WAPO: League of Conservat...