2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAs a woman I'd love to see a woman President, but not just any woman. Vote by person, not by gender
As a woman I'd love to see a woman President, but not just any woman. Vote by person, not by gender. #feelthebern
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)think
(11,641 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Not my cup of tea.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)is reminiscent of what happened to Salvador Allende
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)without UN approval.
She didn't vote for what Bush did -- and neither did Kerry or Biden, when they approved the conditional IWR.
think
(11,641 posts)You choose.
And the lobbyists are another huge can of worms
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)when he voted against the Brady bill and for the bill that exempted gun manufacturers and sellers from state liability laws.
No candidate is perfect.
think
(11,641 posts)And Bernie voted for many gun control bills since that time.
The Iraq war was a huge human tragedy of epic proportions that was completely avoidable. Iraq never attacked us. It was a war of choice.
And still you ignore those pesky lobbyists for the banks that were at the heart of the great recession. Banks with long sordid histories of violating US laws, rigging markets, and bilking the American people for billions.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Said amendment contained language to require the president not only engage in diplomacy first, but also come to congress for a vote before going to war.
And then there's the lot of us - including yourself, I'm sure - who understood from the get-go that the Bush Administration would not engage in diplomacy, and that the AUMF was nothing but a flim-flam to provide a fig leaf for what bush wanted to do anyway. What everyone in the fucking nation knew he was going to do anyway. Did Clinton not understand this?
She also stood in front of the senate and repeated each and every lie, verbatim, as a reason for her yea vote. Saddam is harboring al-Qaeda. Saddam is seeking nuclear weapons. Saddam is increasing his biological weapons capacity and is upgrading his missiles. Every. Damn. Lie. She clearly, resolutely believed every word the administration said.
And now over a million people are dead. Millions more have had their lives ruined. Still more are suffering the devastation of the political and social aftershocks.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)When the invasion occurred, she didn't claim that he had violated the terms of the IWR. Months later her only complaint was that Bush had not adequately prepared for the aftermath of the invasion.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)and not lied, there would have been no war.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x169732
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)stopping Bush and Cheney from invading Iraq. In her speech to the Senate she tried to convince others to put their faith behind the lying Republicons. Either Bush fooled her or she agreed with the invasion, either way she lost her credibility.
Why vote for her with a huge question about her integrity when you can vote for someone that wasn't fooled by Georgie Bush?
And did Georgie trick her into supporting the Patriot Act also?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Running for the presidency in either party. Also, I would not support other candidates just because they are males.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)How so?
And, aren't policies and issue positions more important?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Understand how to interact with other nations they would be limited. No, it takes much more than issues.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Hillary has policy proposals, union endorsements, party endorsements, civil rights hero's endorsements, and is supremely qualified. She has excoriated foreign governments about human rights abuses to their faces in their own countries and has spread diplomacy and philanthropy around the globe. She has been voted most admired woman in the world 14x. She hast vast knowledge on a wide range of global and domestic issues, and is remarkable at building coalitions. And she's a proud Democrat with experience of putting her foot deep inside Republican assholes.
LiberalArkie
(15,713 posts)saturnsring
(1,832 posts)at winning the white house
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Not just any woman! Bush was just any man, but he was a man, so it was okay. She is far better than he, and we survived him, kinda, but her, we must have perfection. So let us use women saying things about how not just any woman will do, implying that sure, we'd like a woman, but only the best one ever, while we never did that when it was two men running. That way, nobody can say it is sexist, cause look. It is a woman saying these things. Then if the woman brings up the fact that she is a woman, let us accuse her of playing the 'gender card'.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)no one ever said she had to be perfect. you alone are the only one that stretched it that far to make this little rant.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)reality, not so much
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Well spoken.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)...but Hillary is not "just any woman." She is a very accomplished woman, and more qualified for the presidency than pretty much anyone in the field.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)...subjective...
There is more to being president than being SOS for 4 years...
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)If being in congress makes one qualified then Secretary Clinton was also Senator Clinton. Where is Senator Sanders time as SOS?
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Once again, there is more to being president...
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Congressional member then this is nit enough. A SOS is on the presidents cabinet.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Congressman, UN Ambassador, Envoy to China, CIA Director and VP before he was elected. Surely all those qualifications made him great at the job, right?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Of the 43 people who have served as President *because Grover Cleveland served two times nonconsecutively*...
26 Presidents had previously been lawyers
22 Presidents had previous military experience; 9 were Generals in the US Army[2]
18 Presidents previously served as U.S. Representatives; 6 of 18 held this office prior to the four 'previous positions' shown in this table. Only one - James A. Garfield - was a Representative immediately before election as President. Only one ex-president, John Quincy Adams, ever served as a U.S. Representative.
17 Presidents previously served as state Governors; 9 of 17 were Governors immediately before election as President.
16 Presidents previously served as U.S. Senators; only 3 immediately before election as President.
14 Presidents previously served as Vice-President. All except Nixon were VP immediately before election as President; 9 of the 14 succeeded to the Presidency because of the death or resignation of the elected President; 5 of those 9 were not re-elected.
8 Presidents were out of office (for at least one year) immediately before election as President.
8 Presidents previously served as Cabinet Secretaries; 6 as Secretary of State; 5 of the 8 served immediately before election as President.
7 Presidents had previous experience in foreign service.[3]
7 Presidents came from the state of Ohio; 6 from New York (7 if Grover Cleveland is counted twice);[4] 5 from Virginia (5 of the first 10, but none since); 4 from Massachusetts; 3 each from the states of Tennessee, California, and Texas; 2 from Illinois. Presidents have come from 10 other states, 18 different states in all.
5 Presidents were family relations of other presidents: Adams (#2 & #6), Harrison (#9 & #23), Taylor (2nd cousin of Madison), Roosevelt (#36 & #32) and Bush (#41 & #43).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States_by_previous_experience
Seems more governors have become President than Secretaries of State have become President.
I will giver her one bonus...Bernie has never been first lady of anything.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Her qualifications she is more qualified than the other presidential candidates.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)So working on the President's cabinet is "more qualified" than actually governing something as big as a state? Lots of people have worked for Presidents, and held cabinet positions. Does that make them eminently superior and more qualified to be POTUS than anyone else? If that is true, maybe it needs to be made a requirement?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Most qualified.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)I believe good judgement is crucial for being qualified to be leader of the free world.
Hillary has proven herself to make bad choices on many occasions.
And she-n-hubbie seem to be in a perpetual state of defending one controversy after another.
No more Clintons in the WH, please.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Hillary has policy proposals, union endorsements, party endorsements, civil rights hero's endorsements, and is supremely qualified. She has excoriated foreign governments about human rights abuses to their faces in their own countries and has spread diplomacy and philanthropy around the globe. She has been voted most admired woman in the world 14x. She hast vast knowledge on a wide range of global and domestic issues, and is remarkable at building coalitions. And she's a proud Democrat with experience of putting her foot deep inside Republican assholes.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Hillary has a lot of experience and she knows her stuff. That makes her qualified. I do not always agree with her, but she is qualified.
Bernie is qualified too, so relax. Although I think Hillary is more qualified on foreign affairs. Bernie seems to be more like an old-school bread-and-butter Democrat. Hillary is obviously more corporatist and hawkish. But that does not mean that she's not whip smart or experienced.
Both are imminently more qualified than the entire GOP clown car combined.
And Hillary is still not "just any woman." Agree with her or not, but she's qualified.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)I don't think being qualified is subjective. Agreement with a candidate is subjective. But someone who is both experienced and well-informed is so even if we don't agree. And I think Hillary has shown that she is both, whether one likes her or not.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And she is certainly qualified, but for what? For moving this country forward on progressive ideas, or on supporting Wall Street and big corporations?
Being qualified is definitely subjective.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)and what I see as his honorable and trustworthy stance on accepting no corporate funds.
I trust him.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)I have Zero trust in Clinton...
whathehell
(29,067 posts)especially in regard to a Supreme Court pick. I do think we should all vote
for the nominee, even if it's disappointing. Bernie is and WILL have an impact,
I believe, whether he wins the nom or not.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)More evidence of a desperate flailing campaign. Gonna be fun seeing these dumb memes get evaporated when Bernie endorses and campaigns for HRC.
CheshireDog
(63 posts)...is so offensive to the intelligence of women. It is no different than posting during 2008 that blacks supporting Obama for his skin color shouldn't do so.
Don't reduce peoples preferences to some petty demographic choice. The vast majority of voters, especially DU voters, research a lot more about their candidates than what genitalia they have. We Hillary supporters support her because we trust her to do the best job, plain and simple.
Grow up.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Tone deaf!
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Hillary stated at the debate she is an outsider due to the fact that she is a women. But of course all of the supporters forget that part...............
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)No woman has ever held the office. Until one does, let's not pretend any woman is an insider.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)because she is a woman, like we all did not realize that fact. Please be let's be real here, I'm pretty sure we all understand that Hillary is woman but that has nothing to do with being a competent POTUS nor a valid reason to vote for her. IMO It's like voting for Bernie because he is a secular Jew, it makes no sense to me at all.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)Imagine if people had said that about Obama -- that you shouldn't vote just for "any black man." As if Obama, the Senator from Illinois and constitutional scholar, was "any black man."
The racism would have been obvious.
Well, it's the same thing when people call the former Secretary of State and NY Senator "any woman." The sexism is blatant.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Don't vote for me because I'm a woman BUT if you vote on merits one of my merits is that I am a woman...... I don't know what to make of that statement. Sounds like double speak to me, but maybe I'm wrong.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)She's very much part of an inside machine.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)And until it opens, no woman is an insider.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)and the wife of a president who was involved with his politics, an OUTSIDER? Really, she is part of the Democratic machine, and has been a part of it for decades.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Skinner
(63,645 posts)The only reason you support Clinton is because she's a girl!
(/sarcasm)
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I almost called it sexist....but they would have hidden it!
still_one
(92,136 posts)The implication is demeaning to women as though they have no independent thought process if they vote for Hillary.
People can and will vote for the person they believe can do the job regardless of race, gender, or other demographic
moobu2
(4,822 posts)can you imagine if the words black were replaced with woman. Wow.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)to call him "just any black man."
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)according to that crazy PUMA back in the day. Got her lots of appearances on FOX
ETA: Harriet Christian. Had to look her name up.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)...with their tales from bullshit mountain. Try doing that in one of their threads and they go and tell the teacher on you.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Response to SunSeeker (Reply #83)
Post removed
ReallyIAmAnOptimist
(357 posts)...the first one nails it (as a woman, that's exactly how I see it).
Thank you for sharing these...
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)and being a "pantsuit aficionado"?
It's been a focal point of her campaign.
Soooo...Remember, vote for the person, not the gender.
Initech
(100,063 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I guess all women who are Hillary supporters just want a woman president and are too dumb to care about said woman's politics? That might be why we have VP Sarah Palin. Oops, no we don't.
Any other condescending gems from the Sanders' campaign?
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)starting the last time she ran.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)as far as attracting new voters for Bernie
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
woman for Sanders! As are all the women in my family of several generations.
Thatcher was a woman, and a Reaganomics Trojan Horse for England.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:14 PM - Edit history (2)
If that was the case, Carly Fiorina would be sitting at 50% in the polls instead of the single digits.
Hillary is not just "any woman," she is the best candidate out there.
Your post is a sexist insult to women. The 50s motif in the graphic is quite appropriate.
kenn3d
(486 posts)To keep it light:
I do not know a single person who would not vote for a candidate because she was a woman.
But here's the version with some pretty good reasons not to vote for this woman.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)in a perfect world, if the candidate is a warmonger they simply wouldn't be considered for the top position.
The professions of lawyer and economist would not be considered either, those have caused way too much damage to the world over the decades. I kind of think those professions are top heavy with psychopaths.