2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton wants to insure Biotechs against losses. First banks, now Biotechs..
Last edited Tue Sep 15, 2015, 05:51 PM - Edit history (1)
She announced this at the Biotech Conference which was a really lucrative day for Hillary. She pocketed a $335,000 speaker fee. Wow, more than a quarter of a million dollars for a speech. What a payday! I think I am safe in saying Hillary doesn't suffer from any gender pay discrepancy.
http://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-all-the-six-figure-speaking-fees-that-hillary-clinton-received-after-leaving-the-state-dept-2015-5
Maybe theres a way of getting a representative group of actors at the table to discuss how the federal government could help biotechs with insurance against risk, she said.
http://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2014/06/25/hillary-clinton-cheers-biotechers-backs-gmos-and-federal-help/
It would seem that the 1% (with all their money) are probably investing in biotechs. So now we should guarantee their losses, provide them with insurance like we do for the too big to fail banks. Really?
I wonder how many trillion that will cost us?
I wonder how much will be left over for the little people.
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)If they want insurance against risk, then it is no longer a private enterprise in which they reap all the benefits.
Can't have it both ways.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)And if they make money, well there are plenty of tax loopholes.
I think that's what you'd call a WIN WIN - for the biotechs that is.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)That's SOP. When you show up and speak to a group such as this, and they give you a nice fee, you're expected to promise them something without really committing to anything. This is Candidate 101.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)TBF
(32,055 posts)Going back to her days on the Board of Walmart. You don't become a multi millionaire by helping low income folks ...
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Amirite?
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)TBF
(32,055 posts)She works for these folks:
Lobbyists for Monsanto, ExxonMobil Raise Money for Hillary Clinton: Registered lobbyists brought in more than $2 million in fundraising for the Clinton campaign, recent filings show.
Jul 17, 2015 3:50 AM CDT
Bundlers, who are often wealthy or well-connected individuals, do more than donate to campaigns. They put their social networks to work for favorite candidates, persuading (often equally wealthy and well-connected) family members, friends, colleagues, and other contacts to donate as well, effectively bringing in far more money than they could under the current legal donation limits. Individuals can contribute $2,700 to candidate committees (as opposed to super PACS) for the primary election and the same amount for the general election, for a total of $5,400 in a campaign cycle. Campaigns don't have to disclose their bundlersunless those bundlers are also lobbyists.
Clinton's bundlers include some familiar names: Jerry Crawford, an outside lobbyist to Monsanto and Iowa kingmaker, put together another $35,000 or so. Tony Podesta, a mega-lobbyist who co-founded the Podesta Group and is the brother of Clinton's campaign chair John, bundled almost $75,000.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-17/lobbyists-for-monsanto-exxon-mobile-raise-money-for-hillary-clinton