HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2012 (Forum) » Grover Norquist hopes con...

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 05:52 PM

View profile

 

Grover Norquist hopes congress will impeach Obama...

http://news.yahoo.com/impeach-obama-194325174.html

NORQUIST: Obama can sit there and let all the tax lapse, and then the Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach. The last year, he’s gone into this huddle where he does everything by executive order. He’s made no effort to work with Congress.




Oddly enough, the comments to this article are pretty level-headed...which is unusual for Yahoo! readers.

And why are Republicans signing pledges to Norquist?

56 replies, 4393 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 56 replies Author Time Post
Reply Grover Norquist hopes congress will impeach Obama... (Original post)
Drunken Irishman Jan 27 OP
rhett o rick Jan 27 #1
DCKit Jan 27 #2
WonderGrunion Jan 27 #3
LostinRed Jan 28 #32
liberal from boston Jan 27 #4
Frustratedlady Jan 27 #17
Andy823 Jan 27 #20
SaintPete Jan 28 #30
BeyondGeography Jan 27 #5
unblock Jan 27 #6
onehandle Jan 27 #7
yourout Jan 28 #41
thelordofhell Jan 27 #8
southernyankeebelle Jan 27 #9
SleeplessinSoCal Jan 27 #10
Skink Jan 27 #11
cgnick Jan 27 #24
bayareaboy Jan 27 #12
madinmaryland Jan 27 #13
ProfessionalLeftist Jan 27 #14
meow2u3 Jan 27 #19
LarryNM Jan 27 #26
Ebadlun Jan 27 #15
JHB Jan 28 #39
roguevalley Jan 27 #16
fromwyoming Jan 27 #18
JHB Jan 28 #40
Nevernose Jan 28 #49
yellowcanine Jan 27 #21
Gore1FL Jan 27 #23
sulphurdunn Jan 27 #22
Blue Owl Jan 27 #25
jwirr Jan 27 #27
schmice Jan 28 #28
VPStoltz Jan 28 #29
Obamacare Jan 28 #31
Lil Missy Jan 28 #33
Bolo Boffin Jan 28 #35
Lil Missy Jan 28 #38
gtar100 Jan 28 #34
WHEN CRABS ROAR Jan 28 #45
madrchsod Jan 28 #36
Ebadlun Jan 28 #37
CBHagman Jan 28 #42
NRaleighLiberal Jan 28 #43
WingDinger Jan 28 #44
TomClash Jan 28 #46
PDJane Jan 28 #47
SemperEadem Jan 28 #48
Zoeisright Jan 28 #50
on point Jan 29 #51
Proud Liberal Dem Jan 29 #52
lonestarnot Jan 29 #53
Liberalman777 Jan 29 #54
DCBob Jan 29 #55
rtracey Jan 29 #56

Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 05:56 PM

1. Norquist should ask Justice Roberts what he thinks about a Unitary Executive now? nm

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:00 PM

2. I wish I could think and believe as magically as Grover does.

View profile

The (R) brand is seriously damaged, and he's still imagining they've won. For all eternity, too boot.

In my magical world, there would be no (R)s, Blue Dogs or DLC Democrats. But I don't believe in magical thinking. We have to get rid of them the hard way and be patient while doing so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:00 PM

3. Wait, does this mean Norquist agrees the Republics have no chance in 2012?

View profile

If so...Yay!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WonderGrunion (Reply #3)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:42 AM

32. Yeah it seems he believes Obama will win re-election.

View profile

And Obama will win re-election. Knowing the Republican they probably will try to impeach

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:01 PM

4. Norquist wants Obama impeached

View profile

Grover you are so delusional. Any member of Congress & Senate that signs your crazy no tax pledge should be impeached!!!!! Only oath is to the Constitution & not to some non-elected politcal partisan!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal from boston (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:38 PM

17. Grover is a traitor. eom

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frustratedlady (Reply #17)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:07 PM

20. I agree.

View profile

They should just slap the irons on him and take him to GITMO like they do with other suspected terrorists! Maybe after 30 or 40 years he might be a changed person!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frustratedlady (Reply #17)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:20 AM

30. Obama's 2nd Term?

View profile



Some little monster woke up on the wrong side of Sesame Street, I'm thinking...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:02 PM

5. Good to see he's conceding the election

View profile

Curb your enthusiasm, Grover.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:03 PM

6. of course, when he says "enough votes in the senate in 2014 to impeach", he means

View profile

enough votes in the house to impeach and enough votes in the senate to remove.

and if you were to ask him about the "high crimes and misdemeanors" that are the grounds for impeachment, he means that obama is <strikeout>black</strikeout> a democrat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:07 PM

7. I hope Grover Norquist has painful, persistant hemorrhoids.

View profile

I bet you $10,000 my hope is more likely than his.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:41 AM

41. Grover Norquist IS painful, persistant hemorrhoid

View profile

To bad there is no surgery to get rid of this pain in the ass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:10 PM

8. This Just In---Grover Norquist Concedes 2012 Election To President Obama

View profile

republicans give up all hope for the Presidency in 2012!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:11 PM

9. I keep asking myself why would a working middle class republican would think it is ok that

View profile

republicans sign pledges that is against their own interests. I think if I had gone to one of their hometown rallies that would be a question I would ask first off. If he answer that he would sign a pledge then I wouldn't vote for him. I would think this would be illegal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:27 PM

10. That's it. Republicans have to admit they hate the country that made their party possible.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:30 PM

11. Colbert should challenge him to debate

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skink (Reply #11)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:55 PM

24. Ol' Grover would get sliced and diced. eom

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:05 PM

12. Or by 2014... ...

View profile


Rover Grover might just be a member of the Whig party of the 21 century!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:07 PM

13. Hmmm. So the bathtub idiot thinks Obama will win in 2012, and the pukes will pick up 30 seats

View profile

in the Senate.

What a fucking idiot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:16 PM

14. Maybe Gingrich can take Grover to the moon with him

View profile

and they can set up a tax-free colony/state for themselves and the dust. Pfft.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProfessionalLeftist (Reply #14)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:43 PM

19. Maybe Obama could use the powers Congress gave him (NDAA)

View profile

to detain Norquist. After all, he does have ties to terrorist organizations

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to meow2u3 (Reply #19)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:31 PM

26. + 1,000 n/t

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:30 PM

15. Who is he and why do Republicans give a shit what he thinks?

View profile

I really can't figure it out - he must have a massive stash of photos.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ebadlun (Reply #15)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:21 AM

39. he has better than photos: he knows who has the money...

View profile

...and where they have it stashed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:33 PM

16. This man is such a fucking bastard. I am amazed that anyone talks to him

View profile

Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:34 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

he's married to a muslim (which is not the point here. Who cares but their side which is the point. They will overlook stuff they hate to lick a dollar bill). their own personal hatreds have no internal cohesion. Fucker straight to the bone. I hope he gets audited. you know he cheats

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:38 PM

18. who is grover norquist?

View profile

And why does he matter?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fromwyoming (Reply #18)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:24 AM

40. A vandal intent on plundering civilization...

View profile

Last edited Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:27 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

...and he matters because he brings together a lot of like-minded hordes and helps keep them on-target against us. Without people like him they'd be just as likely to break ranks and chew each other apart.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fromwyoming (Reply #18)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 09:05 PM

49. Oddly enough, probably one of the most powerful men in DC

View profile

Even though most people have never heard of him. Although far to the right of Reagan, he sees himself as Saint Raygun's torchbearer. He holds a weekly lunch meeting that is a veritable who's who of up and coming Republicans, and conservatives don't get anywhere in DC without his blessing. He makes everyone running for office sign a "tax pledge" that would make Ayn Rand proud, and it gets a little crazier every year. I think it's fair to say that he both shapes and reflects the Republican party's looniness as any given moment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:11 PM

21. Last time Republicans tried impeachment to overturn a Presidential election it didn't work out so

View profile

well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to yellowcanine (Reply #21)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:38 PM

23. The last times they tried to emply supply-sides economics it didn't work out so well either.

View profile

They aren't good at the scientific method.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:18 PM

22. Wow! In the Brave New Republican

View profile

republic, permitting the legally agreed upon expiration of a tax reduction meets the constitutional impeachment standards of a "high crime or misdemeanor". You could make a better case for suggesting that any attempt to use the Constitution as a vehicle to remove a sitting president for political expediency is an act of treason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:34 PM

27. More obstruction. Same as with Bill Clinton.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:33 AM

28. Payback time

View profile

Norquist is now going to demand payback for the money he has lavished on Republicans by ordering them to impeach the President.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:58 AM

29. Grove...You'd better have SCOTUS review your case because your brain has been impeached long ago.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:31 AM

31. This Norquist dude

View profile

whoever he is, just conceded the 2012 election to President Obama. He might be on to something, as in what we already know.lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:19 AM

33. Impeached for what? Being Black?

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lil Missy (Reply #33)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:26 AM

35. For letting taxes go higher.

View profile

That's a high crime in Grover's little ledger book.

Mind you, it's not actually a crime, as in "not against the law." As a matter of fact, the tax cut is a law that expires, so this would be Obama honoring the actual law. But it snaps Grover's law in half, and that's ground for impeachment for him. I guess. Who knows what that idiot is thinking?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bolo Boffin (Reply #35)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 10:32 AM

38. Exactly. He's doing nothing impeachable by letting BUSH tax cuts expire.

View profile

I know, I'm preaching to the chior.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:43 AM

34. "He's made no effort to work with Congress." Christ, Norquist is such an asshole.

View profile

Repugs in congress have spent the last 4 years doing everything they can to block *any* and *every* measure put out by Obama and then he says shit like this. Norquist is going to learn the hard way one of these days that not everyone is as stupid as the republicans are. He can scheme all he wants on how to manipulate people, but he's been exposed as a liar and a greedy son-of-a-bitch. He better stay close to his ivory tower because that shit won't fly on the streets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gtar100 (Reply #34)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:18 PM

45. That statement could be mirrored to read,

View profile

Congress has made no effort to work with Obama.
And there is the real problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:41 AM

36. in the grand scheme of things..

View profile

99.9 % of the people do not care what the fuck he says.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madrchsod (Reply #36)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 09:19 AM

37. Unfortunately the remaining 0.1% includes rather a lot of congressmen

View profile

For reasons I still can't quite make out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:02 PM

42. "He's made no effort to work with Congress."

View profile

That seems to be the new GOP mantra. It's the same old technique: Control the image of the opponent by stating something that is obviously untrue and/or calling into question his/her service and accomplishments. We've seen this movie many times.

So now the rational, fair-minded, consensus-building Obama is being depicted as a stiff-necked, prickly extremist. Expect this to ratchet up throughout the year, and don't be surprised if the media starts taking this as fact. That too is something we've seen a lot in recent years.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:23 PM

43. a small, vile, horrible human being.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:57 PM

44. Havent heard from that Issa punk. He was supposed to impeach also.

View profile

Tie Obama up with indictments and slander. This will accelerate their undoing. When you threaten, and then have no power, you are doomed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:42 PM

46. Norquist is the contemporary American Goebbels

View profile

Whitewashing the history of a Black President.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 07:14 PM

47. What are they going to impeach him for???

View profile

Being black? Being right? Being good to babies? Being able to speak English?

I wish these people would get a grip.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:37 PM

48. aside from marriage vows

View profile

why would any american pledge allegiance to anything other than the flag and the republic for which it stands? One nation; indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

That's what I have a problem with when it comes to office holders throwing in with 'pledges' to Norquist. Their first, lawfully sworn duty
is to all of the people for whom they are elected to represent THEIR interests in this government, not to one of its citizens who doesn't want to pay his fair share of taxes.

How would norquist know what was going on in meetings and negotiations Obama is having with whatever party? It's not like
he's in the room--anything he hears, he hears second hand, a.k.a. hearsay, inadmissible. Clearly, he doesn't take seriously
the various polling numbers which have come out recently showing the nation's total disgust with republicans of every level of
government. Wisconsin must have gotten past him.

It is insane and proof of living in an alternative universe to say that Obama has made no effort to work with congress. That has
been the main problem! He goes too far for consensus, when norquist and all those of his stripe know that their mission was
to frustrate the president implementing his policies. It has been admitted to as much by far too many.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 11:43 PM

50. Fuck you, Norquist.

View profile

Just fuck you, you pig.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:41 AM

51. Another idiot repuke thought. Impeachment is for crimes. It is not = to a recall.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 08:55 AM

52. If Obama gets re-elected running on the same kind of message he delivered in his SOTU

View profile

Last edited Sun Jan 29, 2012, 08:59 AM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

then that means that voters support HIS position, not Norquist's, so Norquist is hyper-delusional if he thinks that people are going to support impeachment of Obama over letting the Bush Tax Cuts expire. Disagreeing with Grover Norquist over tax policy is NOT an impeachable offense. I also somewhat doubt if people are going to vote Obama in for a second term, as well as a hyper-obstructionist Republican Congress unless they're really dumb and don't want Obama to do anything.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 11:02 AM

53. On what grounds fuckwit!

View profile

What a pig.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 01:50 PM

54. They wanted to start Impeachment on Obama One day after he got elected..

View profile

Tough crap morons! You have to have tangable reasons to impeach! Not just because they are Democrat and you think it's your God given right that a Republican occupies the White House!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 02:45 PM

55. What an idiot.

View profile

There is no way on earth this will happen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:33 PM

56. BS

View profile

Fact is once the true Americans realize what Norquist and his cronie repubicans are really up too, they will vote them out. If you are senior, a woman, gay, black, Latino, Asian, Jewish, why would you EVER consider being a republican.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread