Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum(Aside) Pet peeve: Headline editors vs. author's article and the gist of the issue -
Court's decision could widen Medicaid gap (LA Times)Followed by -
Conservative states could reject federal aid, leaving hundreds of thousands without medical insurance.
************************
(Bolding mine - pinto)
It's the states' decisions that would widen Medicaid gap. It's the states' decision to opt out. SCOTUS and the Affordable Care Act simply gave them the choice.
It's my understanding that headline writers operate independently from the newspaper's authors. Write up headlines as the paper is formatted / assembled for print. Way too often, they either editorialize via the headline or spin the gist of the article. And way too often, the headline is all some folks read on a scan. The result - sound bite journalism.
Always makes me go
(ed to add link to article)
http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-court-impact-20120629,0,4783992.story
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1110 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Aside) Pet peeve: Headline editors vs. author's article and the gist of the issue - (Original Post)
pinto
Jun 2012
OP
A writer on the Independent (UK) is collecting headlines to which the answer is plainly 'no'
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2012
#3
elleng
(130,860 posts)1. Right, me too, headlines are often crap.
Headline editors really should go to school somewhere.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)2. How about "question headlines"?
You know, ones that say something like, "Was Obama born in Kenya?" as though legitimate evidence will be presented, and then the article is about one right-wing nut job claiming "Obama was born in Kenya!"
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)3. A writer on the Independent (UK) is collecting headlines to which the answer is plainly 'no'
http://blogs.independent.co.uk/tag/headline/
eg Could Ecuador be the most radical and exciting place on Earth? (The Guardian)
Bo: Political liability? (Politico)
Baghdad Spa Offers Fish Pedicures: Are Luxury Treatments The Newest Sign Of Progress? (Huffington Post)
Did Life On Earth Originate From Zombie Microbes? (NPR)
Does the Pentagon have the right weapons to fight off an alien invasion? (Foreign Policy)
Did Jesus Foresee the US Constitution? (Andrew Sullivan)
eg Could Ecuador be the most radical and exciting place on Earth? (The Guardian)
Bo: Political liability? (Politico)
Baghdad Spa Offers Fish Pedicures: Are Luxury Treatments The Newest Sign Of Progress? (Huffington Post)
Did Life On Earth Originate From Zombie Microbes? (NPR)
Does the Pentagon have the right weapons to fight off an alien invasion? (Foreign Policy)
Did Jesus Foresee the US Constitution? (Andrew Sullivan)
treestar
(82,383 posts)4. Mine too
I saw one to the effect of (LA Times) Obama has large lead among California voters, but will it last?
The large lead was news, why add but will it last? Just in order to editorialize or hope that it won't.