Wed Jun 27, 2012, 10:47 PM
applegrove (74,831 posts)
"Who's Paying for $6 Million of New Anti-Obamacare Ads?" Mother Jones
Who's Paying for $6 Million of New Anti-Obamacare Ads?
Concerned Women for America, a conservative anti-feminist operation dedicated to "bring Biblical principals into all levels of public policy," announced late last week that it is spending $6 million to run ads that highlight "the consequences of President Obama's health care plan." But $6 million is an unusually large ad buy for the group, which hasn't explained (and doesn't have to disclose) where it got the money.
The ads claim that the bill is forcing doctors to drop many patients and that it will add billions of dollars to the deficit. Starting on June 20, the ads have been running in six key swing states: Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Virginia, New Mexico and New Hampshire, and CWA claims that the ad is the first presidential ad to run in the general election in Minnesota.
During a presidential election, it's not unusual for outside groups to run ads attacking either candidate, especially using money from donors whose names don't have to be disclosed, as is the case with the CWA ads. The media buy was sponsored by CWA's lobbying arm, the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee, which is a nonprofit 501(c)4. Unlike CWA, the CWA Legislative Action Committee is allowed to get involved in politics.
The $6 million advertising blitz vastly exceeds the action committee's entire budget from the past several years. According to its most recent tax filings, filed in October last year, CWA's advocacy arm only brought in $2 million in 2010, and ended the year about $500,000 in the hole. The previous year, the group brought in less than a million dollars.
1 replies, 1016 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
"Who's Paying for $6 Million of New Anti-Obamacare Ads?" Mother Jones (Original post)