Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,870 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 08:47 AM Jun 2012

Jim Matheson becomes first Democrat to back placing Eric Holder in contempt

Source: The Hill

Jim Matheson becomes first Democrat to back placing Eric Holder in contempt

By Jordy Yager - 06/26/12 06:52 PM ET

Rep. Jim Matheson (Utah) on Tuesday became the first Democrat to declare his support for placing Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress.

"It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers," said Matheson, according to The Salt Lake Tribine. "Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable."

Matheson’s announcement comes two days before House Republicans plan to vote on the unprecedented measure before the full chamber, even as President Obama has asserted executive privilege over requested documents at the center of the partisan furor.

The six-term lawmaker, who represents the most heavily Republican district of any incumbent Democrat, was one of 31 Democrats to send a letter to President Obama last year expressing grave concerns over the administration’s handling of the botched gun-tracking operation, "Fast and Furious."

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/234921-matheson-becomes-first-dem-to-pledge-contempt-for-holder
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jim Matheson becomes first Democrat to back placing Eric Holder in contempt (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2012 OP
Always good to know there are Democrats willing to sell out their own Arkana Jun 2012 #1
Here We Go Again... Iggy Jun 2012 #2
Yeah, you're not playing politics, Utah Jim BeyondGeography Jun 2012 #3
And I'm sure his religion isn't a factor either. nt siligut Jun 2012 #8
contact information... handmade34 Jun 2012 #4
I'm assuming the next thing the Dino's will do is say they will not back Pelosi for WI_DEM Jun 2012 #5
is he facing a challenge to his seat from the GOP ? littlewolf Jun 2012 #6
Every member of the House stands for re-election every 2 years. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #15
yes .. but if there is no challenger ...... nt littlewolf Jun 2012 #16
Yes. Mia Love is his challenger... Drunken Irishman Jun 2012 #17
Idiots like this are why I no longer give to the DCCC CanonRay Jun 2012 #7
Then I do not support the efforts for his re-election. Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #9
I am not voting Matheson in November. It's official. Drunken Irishman Jun 2012 #10
wait... whut? frylock Jun 2012 #11
Whoa! Matheson is running for president?!? Drunken Irishman Jun 2012 #12
i'm not gonna read shit.. frylock Jun 2012 #13
Then don't bring it over here if you're not going to read... Drunken Irishman Jun 2012 #14

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
1. Always good to know there are Democrats willing to sell out their own
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 08:50 AM
Jun 2012

in the interest of "fairness".

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
5. I'm assuming the next thing the Dino's will do is say they will not back Pelosi for
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 09:33 AM
Jun 2012

Speaker if Dems win back the house.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
17. Yes. Mia Love is his challenger...
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 05:59 PM
Jun 2012

She's supposedly a rising star in the Republican Party because she's black, female and...Mormon.

Currently, she's the mayor of a really small town here in Utah. Polls show Matheson leading by double-digits, tho.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
12. Whoa! Matheson is running for president?!?
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:26 PM
Jun 2012

Re-read my whole argument. I was talking presidential politics. Of course, you knew that, since Nader isn't running for congressional races around the nation - and neither did Dukakis, Mondale and McGovern. Nice try, tho.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
13. i'm not gonna read shit..
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:41 PM
Jun 2012

i already told you that i believe that you have zero cred. i think this exchange furthers my viewpoint.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
14. Then don't bring it over here if you're not going to read...
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jun 2012

I can't help with your comprehension, but you can help not looking like a complete and utter fool by not speaking when you haven't 'read shit'.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Jim Matheson becomes firs...