2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDems to Set Debate Schedule This Week
Eleanor CliftThere will be six Democratic debates announced this week and if candidates stray from the DNCs strict rules, they will be punished by the Party Elite.
Once the Republican presidential candidates leave the debate stage, the spotlight will shift to the Democrats. The Daily Beast has learned that the Democratic National Committee will announce its debate schedule later this week, with six debates beginning in the fall, and with penalties for candidates and media outlets that stray from the sanctioned schedule.
Democrats are way behind the pace they set in the 2008 cycle -- the last time there was an open Democratic nomination. By this point in the primary calendar, there had already been five debates, the first one in South Carolina in April 07. Anita Dunn, a Democratic strategist and debate expert, said in an e-mail that the process got off to a later start this year because Democrats didnt have a declared candidate until May, when Hillary Clinton announced. In 2007, meanwhile, the field was pretty well set by May, she recalled.
If we had tried to hold debates in April 2015 we would have had no candidates. The Republicans are starting in August, we will start in the fall, and I think both parties felt this was the right balance, Dunn wrote.
Debate planning has been underway at the DNC since early last year, and Vice President Bidens staff has been kept in the loop all along as a party leader and someone who has openly talked about possibly running. Lobbying by the campaigns has been intense, with Clintons campaign wanting fewer than six debates, while the staffs of Martin OMalley and Bernie Sanders asking for more than that.
more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/08/03/dems-to-set-debate-schedule-this-week.html
Gothmog
(144,945 posts)think
(11,641 posts)By ERIC LICHTBLAU and ERIC LIPTONOCT. 19, 2012
WASHINGTON In the rarefied world of political consultants who straddle the line between campaign adviser and corporate strategist, Anita Dunn has few peers.
As a confidante of President Obama and a senior campaign adviser, Ms. Dunn has helped prepare him for the debates this month, plotted campaign strategy and acted as a surrogate of sorts in attacking Mitt Romney for a backward-looking attitude on issues like womens rights and health care.
She and her colleagues at SKDKnickerbocker, a communications firm, have built a growing list of blue-chip companies food manufacturers, a military contractor, the New York Stock Exchange and the Canadian company developing the Keystone XL pipeline willing to pay handsomely for help in winning over federal regulators or landing government contracts. Some clients and lobbyists who have teamed up with SKDK say they benefit from the firms ability to provide information about the Obama administrations views....
Read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/20/us/politics/anita-dunn-both-insider-and-outsider-in-obama-camp.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1
More on Anita Dunn:
http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/05/03/obama-anita-dunn-public-relations-keystone-xl-pipeline-tar-sands-rail-transport
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/22/obama-aides-pissed-off-about-anita-dunn.html
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)think
(11,641 posts)If they promise their ties to Koch Industries won't affect the debate process I trust them....
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)the energy, oil and banking industry and maybe the defense contractors.
think
(11,641 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)associations with other lobbyists, etc? I read your post of Anita Dunn, did you read the post of lobbyists, etc?
think
(11,641 posts)And candidate associations with lobbyists is an important issue.
Please feel free to name the lobbyists associated with Bernie Sanders since you are implying as much.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)think
(11,641 posts)works on his staff, or even talked to him.
Being in the same building as a lobbyist where there are MANY other non lobbyist Democratic donors doesn't constitute actual ties.
When a news source discusses a candidate having ties to a lobbyist they are talking about an actual event like donations, fund raising, working for, and in general supporting a particular candidate.
So again please feel free to name these lobbyists you appear to claim have ties to Bernie Sanders.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Makes me wonder why.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)think
(11,641 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I can do red herrings too.
think
(11,641 posts)process?
I have my doubts as to whether the AFL-CIO will be sponsoring any debates as there only 6 and the fact that the only person speaking about them now is a corporate consultant who obviously isn't representing the AFL-CIO but rather some of the corporations they work.
I could be wrong but I have my doubts. That is why I asked as I feel that there is a fairly obvious possibility that Anita Dunn is not an impartial person in the debate process.
Apparently members of the Obama administration also had concerns about impartiality:
By James Warren - POLITICS10.22.124:45 AM ET
~Snip~
As a consultant, not a registered lobbyist, Dunn is not covered by the same ethics rules that mandate disclosing clients or activities. She was required to heed rules for exiting political appointees, effectively barring direct communication with administration officials on behalf of clients for two years.
Still, her activities have troubled even some of her allies, who point to revolving door precedents in Washington and worry that Dunns work may have strained those standards. She maintained frequent contacts with the White House while her firm was representing a growing list of companies with interests in government policy.
And some of those companies are at odds with the administrations stance. Both a White House and a campaign aide cited her firms work on behalf of the Keystone XL Pipeline; the for-profit higher education sector; and a business coalition desiring to reduce tax rates on offshore earnings as examples of clients with interests at odds with administration policy or rules being proposed.
~Snip~
Read more:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/22/obama-aides-pissed-off-about-anita-dunn.html
think
(11,641 posts)FSogol
(45,456 posts)I had one for breakfast today.
think
(11,641 posts)FSogol
(45,456 posts)YMMV.
think
(11,641 posts)Keith Olbermann Hosts The 2007 AFL-CIO Democratic Debate
Having a corporate "consultant" isn't an impartial body in developing the frame work for the debates.
By James Warren - POLITICS10.22.124:45 AM ET
~Snip~
As a consultant, not a registered lobbyist, Dunn is not covered by the same ethics rules that mandate disclosing clients or activities. She was required to heed rules for exiting political appointees, effectively barring direct communication with administration officials on behalf of clients for two years.
Still, her activities have troubled even some of her allies, who point to revolving door precedents in Washington and worry that Dunns work may have strained those standards. She maintained frequent contacts with the White House while her firm was representing a growing list of companies with interests in government policy.
And some of those companies are at odds with the administrations stance. Both a White House and a campaign aide cited her firms work on behalf of the Keystone XL Pipeline; the for-profit higher education sector; and a business coalition desiring to reduce tax rates on offshore earnings as examples of clients with interests at odds with administration policy or rules being proposed.
~Snip~
Read more:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/22/obama-aides-pissed-off-about-anita-dunn.html
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I agree she is shift, but it seems like she was asked to comment about this for the article, Am I missing where she was and maybe currently is involved?
Is she a consultant to any one seeking the nomination?
That daily beast article is very good btw, I missed that back in 2012.
The article the OP posted says this:
If we had tried to hold debates in April 2015 we would have had no candidates. The Republicans are starting in August, we will start in the fall, and I think both parties felt this was the right balance, Dunn wrote.
think
(11,641 posts)She is listed as a debate expert and no one else has stated that the debates will start in the fall except her.
At the very least she is the ONLY person who seems to have a direct knowledge as to what is going on and speaking about it in the article be it in an official capacity, as an adviser or a candidate , or a consultant to a candidate.
Perhaps I am incorrect in making the assumption that she is the source. Still Dunn seems to know what is happening and is explaining the situation as if she is in a capacity to do so.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)but until there is proof of that, I think she was just contacted for the article.
I do appreciate the heads about about Dunn, tho.
brooklynite
(94,384 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It all sounded so traumatic.
rurallib
(62,387 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Is it 'Thinking about'... something, a fragment enticing the reader to fill in the blank?
or
'Thinking about', as in I'm thinking here and there?
or maybe
'Thin king about', as in The thin king has left the castle?
Also, did you consider Wonderingif, meditatingon, or Lookingat?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)66 dmhlt
(1,941 posts)And spare me the "I meant it" mendacity.
brooklynite
(94,384 posts)...and that he's listed on the DNC webpage as a Democratic candidate?
but don't let that stop your anticipatory outrage.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Your comment is so encompassing that it is insignificant with respect to discourse.
Someone today will say the moon landing was faked.
Someone today will say Putin is a good man.
Someone today will say that removing the tops of mountains for coal is our god given right.
Someone.........
William769
(55,144 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)a lot of,people are going to go apeshit. and rightly so.
jalan48
(13,842 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Before August is over. Confirmed with no bullshit TBD.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Excuse me, what 'problem' are these requirements intended to address?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Some upstart dared to disrupt the proper campaign and get himself elected. We can't have that happen again.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)speaking up for Democratic ideas.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Prediction 2: These two debates will be the ones on trade policy and economic policy.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)Sweet nothings bathed in preservatives .
the 3rd way fix has been in for years .