2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWall St Journal: "In This Money Race, Bernie Sanders WINS"
Last edited Sun Jul 19, 2015, 10:58 PM - Edit history (1)
The Wall Street Journal? Just Wow! Who'd-a thunk?
In This Money Race, Bernie Sanders Wins
July 17, 2015 * Wall St. Journal * by By PETER NICHOLAS
Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton won the fundraising competition, but rival Bernie Sanders snagged the award for running the more frugal operation, campaign finance reports filed this week show.
Sen. Sanders of Vermont has been waging a campaign with a fraction of Mrs. Clintons overhead.
The Clinton campaign payroll dwarfed that of Mr. Sanders, who is running second in the Democratic field. Mrs. Clinton spent nearly $3.7 million on campaign salaries; Mr. Sanders, $112,000.
Her campaign spent more than $900,000 on polling in the quarter that ended June 30; Mr. Sanders, $0.
And on it goes.
The Clinton campaign, headquartered in Brooklyn, N.Y., spent about $464,000 on rent more than 10 times what the Burlington, Vt.-based Sanders campaign laid out in rent payments.
Mr. Sanders, who has been seen traveling through Iowa in a rented Chevy, spent $47,000 on campaign travel; Mrs. Clinton, nearly 10 times that sum.
To Charts and remainder of article: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/07/17/in-this-money-race-bernie-sanders-wins/
Response to 99th_Monkey (Original post)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)i'm sure they'll be happy to "correct" it for you & Hillary. or is it O'Malley?
Response to 99th_Monkey (Reply #3)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Keep it up, please.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Hell, give him the maximum.
He needs it because he'll never raise enough to win the GE.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)All bets are off. That's a whole new ball game, sorta like it was with Obama.
Thanks, I needed a good laugh.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)But the people.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)That is all.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Hillary is a whore according to Bernie Sanders supporters and Bernie Sanders voting record in Congress is hideable.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Response to Ed Suspicious (Reply #52)
Post removed
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)brawling with our friends. I can understand your anger. I get equally angry when people like yourself come into a thread that is celebrating our candidate's momentum when you cast shade. It's frustrating to people who are putting their heart and soul into something to be told to grow up, dreamer, you're work is wasted on a loser. That's pretty damned frustrating. It's frustrating to hear our guy called a racist. I'm probably about where you are on your candidate. My excitement is severely diminished if Bernie is unsuccessful.
I think he'll be successful.
Response to Ed Suspicious (Reply #56)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)"Well, you and yours have guaranteed this Democrat who has never voted for a Republican in his life might just alter that stance if Sanders is nominated. At best, I sit it out and give up completely.
I'll never have a positive view of the man after encountering his supporters.
Most Clinton supporters here would be livid at me if I said I would vote R if Bernie didn't win. I guess we're held to a different standard.
I'm bailing for now. I don't dialogue too well with potential Walker/Bush voters.
Response to Ed Suspicious (Reply #59)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Given your pledge to vote GOP when Bernie wins the nomination, which clown car passenger has your vote?
Just curious...
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...because one random person on the interwebs said something bad about your candidate?
That's deep.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)ONE DU OP did apparently. Do you always base your decisions about who you WON'T
support, based solely on what some random supporter of a candidate says or does?
Or are you making a special exception to do this with Sanders?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)we donate to his campaign. Just did so a couple of days ago, but I can chip in another $10.00 in honor of the nay sayers.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)Where assholes intersect with my ignore list ....
Response to Trajan (Reply #40)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
smiley
(1,432 posts)One that should come with a link attached.
Response to smiley (Reply #49)
MohRokTah This message was self-deleted by its author.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)I knew about his pro gun votes, but was floored to read about him voting for that vile GOP amendment to the Homeland Security Bill that banned informing Mexico about America civilian border vigilantes (the racist Minutemen groups).
Heres what I pulled up from the links in the hidden OP:
In 2006, the then-Republican majority in Congress wrote into law protections for anti-immigrant, racist vigilante groups. Even though the militia groups are involved in unsanctioned, armed activity along the Mexican-American border, the Republicans barred the US government from notifying the Mexican authorities about potential dangers to their citizens living or traveling near the US-Mexico border.
The amendment to the Homeland Security Appropriations bill reads:
(I bolded for emphasis) The Congressional Record shows the Dems were livid. Dem rep. Loretta Sanchez from California demanded a recorded vote, not a mere anonymous voice vote. Here's the Congressional Record link to Sanchez' comments and that Amendment language
https://www.congress.gov/amendment/109th-congress/house-amendment/971
The language prohibited notifications of activity only in the states of California, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona - all states on the Mexican border. No such prohibition applied, of course, to groups operating in the border states of Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Michigan, New York, New Hampshire, Maine or Sen. Sanders' home state, Vermont. But then again, these militias are not trying to keep out white Canadians. They are only concerned with our brown southern neighbor, Mexico.
Republicans in Congress were protecting their base: the anti-immigrant racists and gun nuts, both of which were personified in the "Minuteman" organization, the members of which arm themselves and play illegitimate border patrol. But why did Bernie vote YES?
Thanks to Loretta Sanchez, here's the link to the recorded vote: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll224.xml
The amendment passed with 293 votes, including those of 69 Democrats. Some of those Democrats were too afraid to vote otherwise given Bush's victory in 2004, and others were too conservative. But none of them claimed to be progressive. Except Bernie Sanders.
Thanks to this amendment that Sanders voted for, leaders of the vigilante border militia groups are going around openly talking about putting bullets between the eyes of Mexicans and Latin Americans along the border, and gunning down American citizens in their homes and murdering them. These are no idle threats. One militia group murdered a latino American citizen and his 9 year old daughter in 2009. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Raul_and_Brisenia_Flores
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I'm going to look into this further when I get a chance. Or with any luck someone will do it for me.....! I do recall seeing something similar where there turned out to be a good explanation.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Most of the people I see now going on about the "w" word are Hillary supporters. Give it a rest.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)And I'm sure that will stand, too.
The good news: You'll get the last laugh, I'm sure, when the votes start getting counted.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)the high burn rate of her funds.
Bernie is showing he knows how not to over spend and get things done.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Thank you Wall St. Journal!
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)I guess we will see, what we will see, down the road.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)What really talks louder is the average size of individual donations,
and how many regular donors (such as myself) Bernie is accumulating
as he draws record crowds in every color of state, blue, red, purple.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Or if he does manage to get the nomination, he'll barely be a speed bump to the Kochs.
Do not fool yourself,mit will take. Billion+ and a massive organization to win the generals.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)But you are right, it will require an obscene amount of money, but history
is made by those who dare to dream big and keep their eye on the prize.
His campaign's frugality inspires me to donate more, because I know the
money is being used very wisely and it can be trusted with my money.
I love that feeling.
Whoever wins, this is going to be a damn interesting and exciting Primary
season.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)... But in the end, I don't think it matters anyway. He will not win the nominatio, imo.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)I really do hope you Clintonistas do please keep on underestimating Bernie &
the perfect populist storm that Bernie is setting in motion.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I agree with Bernie on the issues more than I do HRC.
But i support HRC, becuase i do not think Bernie can win the generals...
I think his appeal will be limited, I think he is too inexperienced in national campaigns, and perhaps most importantly, he doesn't have the organization to do it.
Reports like this do not allay those fears.
But if he does win the nomination, I want him to win the election, so he had best get his shit together, IMO.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)This campaign is a People driven campaign. Meaning, not money driven.
Bernie's appeal is like nothing ever seen before. It is history in the making.
It is what the People have been hoping would happen and now we all have a front-row seat.
I dropped out of politics after Obama let us down, and now am itching to get back in it for Bernie. I don't need a top-down officer telling me how or where to campaign. I am his organization and I kick ass and take names. And I am not the only one. Not by a longshot. We are legion and we are about to make history.
See, that's the thing that will get Bernie elected. We are legion; we've nothing to lose and everything to gain.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)"We are legion; we've nothing to lose and everything to gain."
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)It takes money and organization to in a national election. I think you are fooling yourself.
However, I appreciate the courteous and heart-felt reply. If Bernie wins the nomination, I sincerely hope it is YOU doing the "I told ya so dance," and not me.
Since I don't agree with your assessment of the Obama Presidency AT ALL, I expect we will not see eye to eye here.
And I most CERTAINLY think we have something to lose.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)At the D.C. level, probably not. But here, locally, to my great surprise, I met a past president of our Democratic Club and he is on board with Bernie or Elizabeth Warren, not with Hillary. That surprised me greatly.
Bernie's volunteers are going to be some of the best and most experienced. Glass-Steagall is foremost on a lot of minds.
And Bernie will push to reinstate a modern form of Glass-Steagall. Hillary is unlikely to do that.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I think if he wins the nomination, he'll get plenty of support. I'm talking about organization: professional, full-time staff. Ya know, the folks that organize and task the volunteers. That's a different animal altogether.
So far, it seems his organization is very thin. He'll need to beef it up very quickly, IMO
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We didn't have much input at all from professionals. We didn't need it. We worked together very well. We were short on volunteers, but lots of us worked very, very hard.
I don't believe anyone was paid. We even rented a headquarters. We have a lot of experience among us. Lots.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)THIS is going to be such a negative for those who are beholden to Corporate interests. For the first time, it is going to be a huge issue in this campaign. IF I were a Hillary supporter, I would not be advertising her huge Corporate funding.
As Biden said this week, 'we have to get this money out of our politics'. He sounded so like Bernie as he warned us that until THAT is accomplished, nothing else can be accomplished. It was as if he was endorsing Sanders.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)That Bernie wins any sort of an award.
I suppose I could file this in the "gotta make it a horse race" category.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)say this week about the money in Politics? Damn, he sounded just like Bernie, WARNING us that we must get the money out of our political system before we can accomplish anything else. It sounded like he was endorsing Bernie.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)After all the crap you've been spouting about Obama and Hillary over the years...
At least I'm not spreading lies as you had claimed on a previous post. Or did you forget again and want me to remind you?
sgtbenobo
(327 posts).... and and have to go to bed so I can meet myself leaving the house in the morning. Go Sabrina! You are doing the work that I can not do. I'm going to put my daughters breakfast out and give up for awhile. But, let's suffice it to say, "I would rather have dog jism in my ears than listen to another fucking shit-head say Bernie can't win. He's already winning. Ok, I said something mean. Now I am going to bed to meet myself coming out in the morning. Like so many others.
nite.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)to spend less. Bernie can do a lot on less. Just wait and see.
udbcrzy2
(891 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)bluedigger
(17,086 posts)And we know who the best is, too! Remember, you read it in the WSJ first!
progree
(10,901 posts)^H ^H ^H
[font color = "gray", size = 1]{sarcasm thingy}[/font]
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)for salaries, but then I'm not sure you are completely serious.
with that {sarcasm thingy} on the bottom of your post.
progree
(10,901 posts)I use my home-brewed
[font color = "gray", size = 1]{sarcasm thingy}[/font]
so that people won't see it until they've read most or all of the post. Whereas if I used DU's
people would see it before reading the first word.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)So thank for leaving a few bread crumbs to follow.
It was funny though. The 'Job Creator' Campaign. .. It does have a ring to it.
progree
(10,901 posts)as hard as it is to believe, they are serious, so one never knows. Somehow a 3rd Way Wall Street say-what-the-polls-say-they-want-to-hear-at-the-moment triangulator would be better for minorities or something or somesuch or whatever, like for sure, I guess.
Edited to add:
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)It's hard to believe how many more weeks we're going to be at this, before
the actual primary elections even start, but it's a good thing we have that time
to close what's left of the apparent gap in the polls still.
I'm turning in now. Thanks for the exchange.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)for so long.
Bernie supporters are more concerned with after.