2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Remains Most Democrats' Top Choice
Fifty-four percent of voters who are Democrats or lean toward the party say they'd prefer to see Clinton as the Democratic nominee in 2016, while 30 percent would rather nominate someone else. In April, 56 percent had named her as their preferred nominee. Fifty-four percent of those voters in the new poll also say that they'd definitely vote for her, virtually unchanged from the 52 percent who previously said the same.
Seventy-seven percent of Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters say they would be "enthusiastic" or "satisfied" to have Clinton as their nominee, a slight dip from the 85 percent who said the same in April.
But she still fares better on that measure than Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who's established himself as Clinton's liberal alternative and her foremost -- if still lagging -- rival for the Democratic nomination in states like New Hampshire.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/06/hillary-clinton-primary-poll_n_7738948.html
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)opportunities. Senator Sanders is on the rise in the polls. How long can Clinton hold him off?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)If this election can be delayed until 2018, the 'Not Hillary' Party might have a chance.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)boston bean
(36,218 posts)in a nothing but POSITIVE Hillary thread.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)boston bean
(36,218 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)boston bean
(36,218 posts)when she announced.
Response to boston bean (Reply #4)
brooklynite This message was self-deleted by its author.
George II
(67,782 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)5...4...3...2...1 blast off
LOL
boston bean
(36,218 posts)I mean that in all sincerity!
Not as a slight on your post!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)boston bean
(36,218 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)"Clinton's favorability rating, which peaked during her tenure as secretary of state, took a downward turn after she shifted back into candidacy mode. She's now viewed more unfavorably than favorably nationwide, although Democrats continue to rate her highly. Political analysts have also pointed to an increasing faction of voters who view her as dishonest or untrustworthy in the aftermath of controversies surrounding her State Department emails and the finances of the Clinton Foundation.
"That could pose a problem for Clinton in the general election. Only 42 percent of all voters say they'd at least consider voting for her, down from 50 percent in April.
"But that doubt doesn't seem to be affecting her base. More than half of Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters say they'd rather have her than any other candidate. Just 23 percent of those who'd prefer another nominee, or about 7 percent of Democratic voters overall, cite her character as the main reason they're concerned about nominating her."
And this:
"Seventy-seven percent of Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters say they would be "enthusiastic" or "satisfied" to have Clinton as their nominee, a slight dip from the 85 percent who said the same in April.
"But she still fares better on that measure than Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who's established himself as Clinton's liberal alternative and her foremost -- if still lagging -- rival for the Democratic nomination in states like New Hampshire."
Then there's this on the recognition factor:
"Sanders remains far more of an unknown quantity than Clinton, with nearly one-third of the Democratic Party's voters not sure what to make of him. He also attracts more dissension: Although Democrats are more likely than not to say they'd be happy with either candidate, 20 percent say they'd be "dissatisfied" or "upset" to have Sanders as their nominee, compared with just 14 percent who say the same of Clinton."
----------
It would be a huge upset if Sanders can knock off the Clinton machine.
Man of Distinction
(109 posts)after the Summer of Sanders.
I've always thought Clinton's support throughout the years was soft, and like in 2008, it remains soft, and looking for someone who's an upstart like Obama was, but they are looking for authenticity, and Bernie has the creds and very consistent with his policies/issues. People are looking for someone to TRUST, and if they can believe in Bernie, then he can win.
Republicans can't even win, and they have no clear frontrunner. It's like spinning a wheel of fortune, and you'd have to hope for the best.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)One could hardly describe HRC's support as "soft". Obama besting her for the nomination was hard-fought, and hard-won.
Hillary's poll numbers speak to the fact that her support is anything but soft, back in '08 or now.
Cha
(296,846 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)fbc
(1,668 posts)It's still name recognition at this point. That will change.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)And trends, as anyone who watches politics knows, are what really matters.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
George II
(67,782 posts)It's what how she's doing against her competition, both Democratic (or "Independent" and Republican.
On all fronts she's kicking ass.
brooklynite
(94,333 posts)That relatively straight line you see for Hillary -- at about 60% -- including the period when Sanders started going up -- is what they call a "trend".
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)And Mrs. Clinton is NOT the nominee, and Sanders is, will you supporters of Mrs. Clinton stand behind Sanders?
Just wondering.
Response to boston bean (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... to bring out the but, but, but crowd.
But it's too early, but it's all gonna change, but it's just name recognition, but it's all meaningless at this point, but Bernie hasn't gotten his message out there yet, but ... but ... but.
boston bean
(36,218 posts)bob4460
(235 posts)To the over 50 crowd,who have land line,a lot of the people UNDER 50 do not have landlines any more.So they are not represented in the polls and that is where the real support is.Older Americans mostly watch MSM News.