Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NPolitics1979

(613 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 10:03 PM Apr 2015

Democrats can regain control of the US Senate in 2016 without CO and NV.

Democrats are strongly favored to win Democratic held seats in CA,CT,HI,MD,NJ-special,NY,OR,VT,and WA.
In order to regain control of the US Senate- Democrats need to win at least 6 Republican held seats
1)IL-Duckworth-D
2)WI-Feingold-D
3)NH-Hassan-D
4)OH-Strickland-D
5)FL-Murphy-D
6)AK-Begich-D

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats can regain control of the US Senate in 2016 without CO and NV. (Original Post) NPolitics1979 Apr 2015 OP
Depends customerserviceguy Apr 2015 #1
I have to agree with you on the Hillary coattails davidpdx Apr 2015 #13
Is Begich running again? craigmatic Apr 2015 #2
Well, that's good, because ... earthside Apr 2015 #3
NV and CO are the two most vulnerable Democratic held US Senate seats in 2016 NPolitics1979 Apr 2015 #4
i would love to see someone primary bennet from the left fizzgig Apr 2015 #11
Oregon may be vulnerable with Wyden pushing through Fast Track for the TPP now... cascadiance Apr 2015 #5
In the Democratic Primary maybe. In the November General Election a firm NO. NPolitics1979 Apr 2015 #7
Not to be a broken record on NH, but ... NHDEMFORLIFE Apr 2015 #6
Alaska is not going back To Dem unfortunately. Calista241 Apr 2015 #8
Alaska is a stretch Gothmog Apr 2015 #9
I am not sure why NC is discounted out of hand. Persondem Apr 2015 #10
Maybe not...here's my opinion... N_E_1 for Tennis Apr 2015 #12
good post and good points. RW has pretty much locked in state and local control. Sunlei Apr 2015 #15
Feingold hasn't even declared he's running my bet is he won't bigdarryl Apr 2015 #14

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
1. Depends
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 10:12 PM
Apr 2015

Will Hillary have coattails, the way that Barack Obama did? I'm pretty doubtful about that.

The best we can hope for is a ho-hum Repuke that does not fire up their base. Jebbie would do nicely. Then it comes down to a choice by the mushy middle as to whether they're going to put the first woman in the White House, or just the third Bush within their lifetime. If they come out to vote, and the Rethugs just stay home, because they don't see much difference between the two, then we do better down-ballot.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
13. I have to agree with you on the Hillary coattails
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 05:45 AM
Apr 2015

We've had people on here say "oh if Hillary is on the ticket she'll win this state and this state and this state" (of which all of them are deep red states). It's called being delusional. I think Jeb Bush would be the most likely to successfully challenge Hillary. If you get someone like Rotten Rubio or Crazy Cruz, the election won't be as close.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
3. Well, that's good, because ...
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 10:22 PM
Apr 2015

Michael Bennet is quite unpopular with progressive Democrats and unaffiliateds in Colorado.

We can hope Bennet is challenged in a primary, but with Anschuetz money, bankers' money, and fossil fuels industry money, Bennet is to be favored to be the Democrat's candidate.

Hillary ain't Obama ... if she is the presidential nominee, there won't be any coattails in Colorado, assuming she eeks out a narrow win nationally.

NPolitics1979

(613 posts)
4. NV and CO are the two most vulnerable Democratic held US Senate seats in 2016
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 10:46 PM
Apr 2015

NV-if Sandoval-R runs.
Other Republican candidates-Krolicki,Hutchinson,Laxalt,or Roberson-Tossup-Leans D
Angle-R Likely D
CO-if Coffman-R or Tipton-R run
Bennet will defeat Buck-R or Lamborn-R
The most vulnerable Republican held seats in 2016 are
IL-Duckworth-D
OH-Strickland-D
FL-Murphy-D
WI-if Feingold-D runs
NH-if Hassan-D runs

NPolitics1979

(613 posts)
7. In the Democratic Primary maybe. In the November General Election a firm NO.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 08:25 AM
Apr 2015

The Oregon Republican bench is weak. Wyden will win the November General Election by at least a low double digit margin.

NHDEMFORLIFE

(489 posts)
6. Not to be a broken record on NH, but ...
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 11:13 PM
Apr 2015

Ayotte is not going to lose. Having been an activist in NH politics for 40 years. I would be astounded if she lost. The major TV station in the state follows her every move when she is in the state, fawning over her every word. She has the newspapers eating out of her hands, and she does all the grunt work a member of the Senate (or House, for that matter) needs to do to keep the seat for as long as she wants it. She has conned independents into thinking she is a moderate. It would take a lot of high-priced explaining to change that perception.
If there are poll numbers citing her vulnerability, I'd love to see them, particularly to find out who is doing the polling and what their methods are.
Barring a Democratic landslide at the top of the ticket, or her doing something incredibly stupid, Ayotte is a lock. I'd much rather see Hassan maintain the governorship.

Calista241

(5,585 posts)
8. Alaska is not going back To Dem unfortunately.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 08:44 AM
Apr 2015

The seat only went Dem for one term because a corrupt prosecutor interfered. In addition, the Repubs are going to win Nevada at least, so we'll need to pick up 7 seats.

Persondem

(1,936 posts)
10. I am not sure why NC is discounted out of hand.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 12:44 PM
Apr 2015

Burr's favorability is in the 30's, and the rednecks will likely vote in fewer numbers with a white democratic nominee. Clinton is well liked.

N_E_1 for Tennis

(9,664 posts)
12. Maybe not...here's my opinion...
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 01:24 PM
Apr 2015

not that's it's worth much. But...
I feel that the R's have figured out that the POTUS really is not the power position.
The true power lies in the two houses and beyond, think corporate money.
We have observed this in Mr. Obama's tenure.
They tweaked their power position. They know how to block legislation. They learned. We cried.

As a closet psychopath I understand this position. Brilliant. Give up a little, gain a lot. No need to be upfront, disturb from the rear. Gain the true power.

Sometimes you need to step away from the stage to really appreciate the music.

All I ask before you flame the hairs off my eyes is to think about it.

BTW, I was in MI for much of my military career this was a everyday tactic.

Again and I must say this, I so totally hope I'm wrong. Then I could go to sleep at night.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
15. good post and good points. RW has pretty much locked in state and local control.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 11:16 AM
Apr 2015

They know it's all about having enough votes to take over the position. That's why they put so much time into redistricting the local communities over the past couple decades.

The only democracy we have is our one vote. After election the republic takes over and the elected official can do whatever they wish.

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
14. Feingold hasn't even declared he's running my bet is he won't
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 06:47 AM
Apr 2015

Plus the democrats have to come up with decent candidates if they are going to win so far I'm not impressed by some of those who are saying there running for Senate for 2016.Except maybe Harris out of CA.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democrats can regain cont...