Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:48 AM May 2012

Mass knows Robdme - NY Times: Romney’s Massachusetts Woes: A Bad Omen? (Obama up 25)

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/24/romneys-massachsetts-woes-a-bad-omen/



A new poll in Massachusetts has confirmed what everyone knows — that Mitt Romney will very likely lose Massachusetts in November to President Obama. The Suffolk University/7 News poll conducted Sunday through Tuesday, shows Mr. Obama ahead by 25 percentage points among likely voters, with Mr. Romney winning only 34 percent of support in the state where he was once governor.

The interesting point is how this fits into history. It turns out to be rare for a candidate who loses his home state to go on and win the presidency. (Some may quibble with the definition of “home state,” but it generally refers to the state where the candidate lives, not where he was born.)

...


Mr. Romney went to college in Massachusetts, has lived there for years, ran unsuccessfully for the Senate from there and served as governor from 2003 to 2007. His campaign headquarters is based there. But he appears to have almost no chance of winning the state now. This is not to say that he will also lose the presidency, only that the historical odds are against him.

James Thurber, a presidential historian at American University, said that presidents who lose their home states become estranged from their base. “It depends whether the individual has moved away from the core voter in their state, and certainly the story there is that Romney has,” Mr. Thurber said. Of course, you can still win your home state and lose the presidency. Just ask George H.W. Bush, who won Texas in 1992 but lost the presidency, or John Kerry, who lost the presidency in 2004 but won his home state — Massachusetts.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

enough

(13,256 posts)
1. This is all part of the picture of the campaign he will run.
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:56 AM
May 2012

The usual calculations don't enter in. He doesn't even plan to really campaign in the usual manner, pressing the flesh and all that. He's got only one strategy: money. He's expecting money to win for him just as it has all his life. We shall see.

siligut

(12,272 posts)
3. Having dealt with Mormon business men
Fri May 25, 2012, 11:58 AM
May 2012

And knowing some of their underhanded tricks, I would say that it will come down to the ballots.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
4. "Didn't we hear that enough times in 2000?"
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:32 PM
May 2012

We did indeed. On a sidenote, have you heard how Elizabeth Warren is faring against Brown? The last poll I saw had her running something like 9 pts behind, while the president enjoyed a double digit lead over Romney. What's up with that?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
7. It is weird how state wide vs. national elections differ in states
Fri May 25, 2012, 02:35 PM
May 2012

Look at WI, which went to Obama and is thought of as progressive. I guess it has to do with Republicans being more rabid about local politics. They decided to work their way up from the bottom, starting with school boards and the like. So maybe they have better structures for statewide elections, at least in some places.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
5. Dems should make a big stink about the fact he won't win...
Fri May 25, 2012, 02:15 PM
May 2012

...his home state of MA. When Gore lost his home state it was an embarrassment to him and it cost him the election. We should embarrass him that hew won't win MA.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
9. Yea I think you are right.
Fri May 25, 2012, 07:24 PM
May 2012

MI,MA,NH, and CA were he has houses he will loose. If he wins any of them he will probably win the election, but I don't think that will happen.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
6. If Romney feels his record as Mass governor is so great, why aren't they gonna vote for him?
Fri May 25, 2012, 02:32 PM
May 2012

Hmmmmmm....something doesn't add up.

Obama appears to have no issues with voters from his home state of Illinois

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
12. Agree. It's telling that Rmoney seems to avoid any mention of his work as Governor
Sat May 26, 2012, 12:14 PM
May 2012

Since it's now Etch-a-Sketch time I'd have figured he'd highlight some of the things he did as governor as a way to make his move to the center. So far that hasn't happened, and he really seems to be ducking the issue.

Mr.Turnip

(645 posts)
13. You know the fact that ANYONE thought Mass could be competitive shocks me.
Sat May 26, 2012, 01:30 PM
May 2012

Really the state is the bluest of the blue after Vermont, Romney could win by +10 Nationwide and he'd still easily lose it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Mass knows Robdme - NY Ti...