Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:18 PM Dec 2014

NY Times: G.O.P. Donors Seek to Narrow Field of Presidential Candidates to One

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/us/politics/gop-donors-seek-to-narrow-field-of-presidential-candidates-to-one.html?google_editors_picks=true


-snip-
Dozens of the Republican Party’s leading presidential donors and fund-raisers have begun privately discussing how to clear the field for a single establishment candidate to carry the party’s banner in 2016, fearing that a prolonged primary would bolster Hillary Rodham Clinton, the likely Democratic candidate.

The conversations, described in interviews with a variety of the Republican Party’s most sought-after donors, are centered on the three potential candidates who have the largest existing base of major contributors and overlapping ties to the top tier of those who are uncommitted: Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida and Mitt Romney.
-snip-

The comments are interesting. A number of people refer to Hillary as being a Republican.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times: G.O.P. Donors Seek to Narrow Field of Presidential Candidates to One (Original Post) LiberalElite Dec 2014 OP
Yeah, interesting all right. Jackpine Radical Dec 2014 #1
One commenter said LiberalElite Dec 2014 #2
Remember, it's not the number of beings in the car that make it a clown car.... daleanime Dec 2014 #4
All it will get them is a clown car without wheels. yellowcanine Dec 2014 #6
Don't get complacent, though. calimary Dec 2014 #9
I'm not, but the last time someone tried to "scare off" primary opponents was Phil Graham in 1996. yellowcanine Dec 2014 #10
they don't want Americans to see what their candidates really think... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #3
We can laugh all we want at the GOP PAProgressive28 Dec 2014 #5
and then we the sheeple LiberalElite Dec 2014 #8
Why have elections and primaries anymore? Jamaal510 Dec 2014 #7
What a stupid headline DFW Dec 2014 #11

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Yeah, interesting all right.
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:23 PM
Dec 2014

Looks like they're taking the wheels off the clown car a little early this time around.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
2. One commenter said
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:25 PM
Dec 2014

they should get a bigger clown car than last time or maybe a trailer to hitch to the clown car for the lesser clowns.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
4. Remember, it's not the number of beings in the car that make it a clown car....
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:26 PM
Dec 2014

it's that they are clowns.

yellowcanine

(35,693 posts)
10. I'm not, but the last time someone tried to "scare off" primary opponents was Phil Graham in 1996.
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 10:13 AM
Dec 2014

Remember him? The guy who raised 20 million dollars and beat out Bob Dole for the nomination? Oh wait....

He actually withdrew BEFORE the New Hampshire Primary and endorsed Bob Dole after getting stomped by Pat Buchanan in the Louisiana caucus because Buchanan, though having little money, had passionate supporters of the Religious Right behind him. And that is why this kind of maneuver does not work.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
3. they don't want Americans to see what their candidates really think...
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 09:26 PM
Dec 2014

they are looking for a way to get the Ted Cruz crowd to support Jeb Bush....."Help Us Jebonobi you're our only hope" cry the establishment GOP....they are loathe to be raked over the coals by the Louie Gohmerts and the Rand Pauls fighting it out in a Primary...watching them claw each others eyes out as they are want to do..allows the Democrats to sit back and watch them implode...not good for their "sucker born every minute" marketing style of politics....Just find a way to talk about issues that makes it SEEEEM palatable to their base. And do it in one or two phrases to boot so that they can repeat it without really knowing what it means!

PAProgressive28

(270 posts)
5. We can laugh all we want at the GOP
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 05:13 AM
Dec 2014

but this is the crap that's destroying America. Regular Americans have no say in the matter. The big money will decide who is to next serve them. I really don't want to turn this into another Hillary thread but you can bet the Party will also try to wrap up our primary ASAP.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
8. and then we the sheeple
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:37 PM
Dec 2014

will be expected to dutifully turn out and vote for whoever they say. Remind me again how we're not becoming a two-party dictatorship.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
7. Why have elections and primaries anymore?
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:35 PM
Dec 2014

All they (the RW billionaires) want to do is dump money into ads that sway public opinion favorably for their preferred candidates, while politicians that they've already bought push forth with voter ID laws. It feels like we're creeping back towards the days where only rich landowners had the power to vote.

DFW

(54,291 posts)
11. What a stupid headline
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 09:53 AM
Dec 2014

When has there EVER been more than one nominee? GOP or otherwise? The field ALWAYS gets narrowed to one, DUH!

What the billionaires want to avoid is a long, bloody primary fight with several billionaires tossing unimaginable (for us mortals) sums of money at rival right wingers, most of whom have only slightly varying versions of the same Fox Noise regurgitation.

Have a "debate" between Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Steve Doocy and Gretchen Carlson, and you'd have word for word the same "debate" you'd hear if the people at the podia were Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann.

With the money these guys are gonna waste on right wing losers, which all but one of them will be (and the last man standing hopefully being the loser in November, 2016), we could probably fund successful cancer research, build a national tuition-free university from scratch, or build a state-of-the-art hospital that offers all services free of charge.

But what self-respecting Republican billionaire would want to waste a few billion on some useless project like THAT?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NY Times: G.O.P. Donors S...