Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 04:39 PM Oct 2014

AK - Sullivan, Begich clash on policy in final US Senate debate

http://www.adn.com/article/20141030/sullivan-begich-clash-policy-final-us-senate-debate
The comments on this one are also quite revealing. I am hopeful that Mark will hold on. He was much more in command of the issues and facts while Dan spouted Republican talking points, including the ridiculous "deciding vote on Obamacare" and "votes with Obama 97% of the time," when, in fact, Politifact has rated Begich one of the most independent senators in DC. Sullivan is an empty suit and a Koch plant.





Alaska’s two leading U.S. Senate candidates on Thursday night met for the last time before Election Day in a policy focused debate on the state’s public broadcasting network.

<snip>


The candidates were each allotted two questions to ask the other. Begich tried to pin down Sullivan on a pair of policy issues.

One was whether Sullivan would vote to reauthorize the Patriot Act, an anti-terrorism bill that’s been criticized for infringing on civil liberties; Begich’s second question was whether Sullivan backed a federal funding mechanism called “advance appropriations.” Begich used that second query to tweak his opponent for his support from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who is coming to Alaska this weekend to stump for Sullivan, and whom Begich characterized as the “king of government shutdowns.”


Sullivan, meanwhile, asked Begich why he’d voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012, and if he’d regretted running television ads in his 2008 U.S. Senate campaign attacking the longtime incumbent Republican, Ted Stevens. Begich denied running the attack ads, but Sullivan’s campaign quickly produced a link to a Begich commercial that did, in fact, quote Alaskans criticizing Stevens.

<snip>




Incidentally, just because the charges against Ted Stevens were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct does not mean he was innocent. He wasn't.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AK - Sullivan, Begich clash on policy in final US Senate debate (Original Post) Blue_In_AK Oct 2014 OP
Oh no, Ted STevens is guilty and corrupt, all cons are. randys1 Oct 2014 #1
Ted Stevens was even recorded saying Blue_In_AK Oct 2014 #2

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. Oh no, Ted STevens is guilty and corrupt, all cons are.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 04:43 PM
Oct 2014

Cons admit that they are cons to take your money and for no other reason

And if you have one in your family, watch out. they will steal from you as quickly as they will steal from a stranger

every
time

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
2. Ted Stevens was even recorded saying
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 04:46 PM
Oct 2014

"We might go to jail for this." The only thing that saved his bacon was Eric Holder finding that the Prosecutors had been overzealous.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»AK - Sullivan, Begich cla...