Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAK - Sullivan, Begich clash on policy in final US Senate debate
http://www.adn.com/article/20141030/sullivan-begich-clash-policy-final-us-senate-debateThe comments on this one are also quite revealing. I am hopeful that Mark will hold on. He was much more in command of the issues and facts while Dan spouted Republican talking points, including the ridiculous "deciding vote on Obamacare" and "votes with Obama 97% of the time," when, in fact, Politifact has rated Begich one of the most independent senators in DC. Sullivan is an empty suit and a Koch plant.
Alaskas two leading U.S. Senate candidates on Thursday night met for the last time before Election Day in a policy focused debate on the states public broadcasting network.
<snip>
The candidates were each allotted two questions to ask the other. Begich tried to pin down Sullivan on a pair of policy issues.
One was whether Sullivan would vote to reauthorize the Patriot Act, an anti-terrorism bill thats been criticized for infringing on civil liberties; Begichs second question was whether Sullivan backed a federal funding mechanism called advance appropriations. Begich used that second query to tweak his opponent for his support from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who is coming to Alaska this weekend to stump for Sullivan, and whom Begich characterized as the king of government shutdowns.
Sullivan, meanwhile, asked Begich why hed voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012, and if hed regretted running television ads in his 2008 U.S. Senate campaign attacking the longtime incumbent Republican, Ted Stevens. Begich denied running the attack ads, but Sullivans campaign quickly produced a link to a Begich commercial that did, in fact, quote Alaskans criticizing Stevens.
<snip>
Incidentally, just because the charges against Ted Stevens were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct does not mean he was innocent. He wasn't.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 864 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AK - Sullivan, Begich clash on policy in final US Senate debate (Original Post)
Blue_In_AK
Oct 2014
OP
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. Oh no, Ted STevens is guilty and corrupt, all cons are.
Cons admit that they are cons to take your money and for no other reason
And if you have one in your family, watch out. they will steal from you as quickly as they will steal from a stranger
every
time
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)2. Ted Stevens was even recorded saying
"We might go to jail for this." The only thing that saved his bacon was Eric Holder finding that the Prosecutors had been overzealous.