Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRand Paul’s twisted race lies: His new views on civil rights are as phony as the old ones
Rand Pauls twisted race lies: His new views on civil rights are as phony as the old onesProspective GOP front-runner claims views on civil rights have evolved. Not if you dig into what he actually says
PAUL ROSENBERG
If you Google Rand Paul Civil Rights Act, the first prompt that comes up is unconstitutional, so it was definitely heartening to see his apparent about-face on the acts 50th anniversary, when he attended a local commemoration at the Shelbyville, Kentucky, home of Dr. Maurice F. Rabb, a prominent civil rights activist in the 1940s and 50s. Every major civil rights activist that came to the South stayed with my parents, Chris Rabb said. They were not allowed to stay in hotels.
Paul has previously voiced his objection to the Civil Rights Act precisely because it put an end to such private-sector discrimination. But on this occasion, he released a statement saying, It is simply unimaginable to think what modern America would be like if it were not for the brave men and women who stood up for the rights of all Americans. The legislation changed the future of our nation by enforcing the belief that all men and women are created equal.
The next day, Rachel Maddow duly noted Pauls change of heart. Rand Paul went to Shelbyville yesterday, and he sang the praises of the civil rights movement and the civil rights activists and specifically the Civil Rights Act of 1964, she said, going on to repeat Pauls statement, even displaying it on screen. Rand Paul coming out in full support of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, she said afterward, which is nice, and I dont mean to be raining on the parade, but I have to point out that this marks something of a shift in Rand Pauls position on this legislation. She then replayed a clip of her famous May 19, 2010 interview with Paul, in which he repeatedly refused to say he would have supported the bill. Specifically, she played a segment in which Paul said, Theres 10 different titles, you know, to the Civil Rights Act, and nine out of 10 deal with public institutions, and Im absolutely in favor of. One deals with private institutions, and had I been around, I would have tried to modify that. He went on to indicate that he might or might not have finally agreed to support the bill, with just one title that he objected to.
I cant help but join with Maddow in applauding Pauls change of heart but I do still harbor some deeper doubts, not least because Paul has dissembled, disinformed and confused so frequently and so much on the subject over the years hes even gotten the number of titles in the Civil Rights Act wrong; there are 11 of them, not 10. More significantly, as Ian Millhiser noted back on April 10, 2013, there are numerous examples of Paul going on the record both in print and on videotape expressing his opposition to the Civil Rights Act:
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/07/12/rand_pauls_twisted_race_lies_his_new_views_on_civil_rights_are_as_phony_as_the_old_ones/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1415 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul’s twisted race lies: His new views on civil rights are as phony as the old ones (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jul 2014
OP
On the issue of civil rights, Rand Paul is a complete phony (and possibly a liar as well).
radicalliberal
Jul 2014
#1
Don't worry. We black folk are not idiots. When he came to Howard University and proceeded to
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2014
#2
The "lib'rul" media will never call on Rand to denounces his dad's vile, racist words
Adenoid_Hynkel
Jul 2014
#3
radicalliberal
(907 posts)1. On the issue of civil rights, Rand Paul is a complete phony (and possibly a liar as well).
He's just another politician out to get the votes of the gullible.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)2. Don't worry. We black folk are not idiots. When he came to Howard University and proceeded to
lecture us about the Republican Party's history, most of us laid into him good.
He and his father are bigots. Period!
I don't give a damn what he says about drugs and the justice system or what he does with Cory Booker. He's a phony on the civil rights issue and from what I'm seeing, most of us are not falling for it.
I hope that mainstream America doesn't fall for it, either.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)3. The "lib'rul" media will never call on Rand to denounces his dad's vile, racist words
They spent the better part of 2008, telling us Obama had a pastor problem and that he needed to condemn Rev. Wright, but Baby Ron Paul gets pass after pass as he fawns all over his white supremacist dad and backs his presidential runs.