Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:00 PM
MindMover (2,798 posts)
Ron Paul still in the race with millions in funding and zero debt
First Rick Santorum slipped out of the race for the GOP nomination, and next Newt Gingrich said he would support Romney but would still run. But what about Ron Paul’s quest for the White House?
According to the latest bulletin from the campaign headquarters of the Texas congressman, Ron Paul is still in the race and rolling in the bucks. Republican Party presidential hopeful Ron Paul is still polling strong among many demographics and shows no sign of slowing down. At least if his bank records have anything to do with it. The candidate’s camp announced on Friday that so far in 2012 his campaign has managed to bring in almost $10.4 million in contributions from donors determined to keep the congressman in the GOP race. Those funds won’t be funneled to pay off earlier spending, either. His officials say that in addition to the big bucks that came in for the first quarter, the Ron Paul campaign has zero debt at this point in the race. Compare that to Republican Party rival and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich who was reportedly in the hole to the tune of $4.5 million last week, according to an article published by Slate. As Ron Paul and Gingrich are now left as the only viable Republican alternative to Mitt Romney, Gingrich’s chances might soon run dry as his pocketbook does the same. Will Paul have a chance to pull through against the frontrunner, though? http://rt.com/usa/news/ron-paul-money-race-590/
|
28 replies, 2615 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| MindMover | Apr 2012 | OP | |
| Kennah | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| TBF | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| MarianJack | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| TBF | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| Cosmocat | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| UCmeNdc | Apr 2012 | #12 | |
| Mosaic | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| MindMover | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| ZombieHorde | May 2012 | #27 | |
| Ikonoklast | Apr 2012 | #8 | |
| treestar | Apr 2012 | #9 | |
| Blue_Tires | Apr 2012 | #18 | |
| Ptah | May 2012 | #22 | |
| Blue_Tires | May 2012 | #25 | |
| Ptah | May 2012 | #26 | |
| and-justice-for-all | Apr 2012 | #10 | |
| Drunken Irishman | Apr 2012 | #11 | |
| ellisonz | Apr 2012 | #13 | |
| JHB | Apr 2012 | #14 | |
| Blue_Tires | Apr 2012 | #17 | |
| WI_DEM | Apr 2012 | #15 | |
| Arkana | Apr 2012 | #16 | |
| FSogol | Apr 2012 | #19 | |
| NNRA | Apr 2012 | #20 | |
| maddezmom | Apr 2012 | #21 | |
| MrSlayer | May 2012 | #23 | |
| thecentristword | May 2012 | #24 | |
| Jamaal510 | May 2012 | #28 |
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:07 PM
Kennah (6,739 posts)
1. So, Ron Paul is just in it for the money
|
Slow and steady, little advertising, buncha speeches, and his campaign funds grow. He's got a different appeal in Wingnutlandia than Nutty Newtie, Sister Sarah, Crazy Eyes, or Spurting Santorum. As such, he has to know he won't get the big donors, but he can still rack up money.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:27 PM
TBF (18,403 posts)
2. He could still run 3rd party - I wouldn't put it past him.
|
I would think the republican higher ups would put some pressure on him, but he seems to do what he wants. May be interesting ...
|
Response to TBF (Reply #2)
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:41 PM
MarianJack (7,286 posts)
5. He can but I don't think he will.
|
I think he'd be afraid that doing so would hurt his idiot son's future possibilities for a place on the national ticket.
PEACE! |
Response to MarianJack (Reply #5)
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 07:39 AM
TBF (18,403 posts)
6. I hope you're right -
|
I wish he'd retire already!
|
Response to MarianJack (Reply #5)
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 09:04 AM
Cosmocat (5,395 posts)
7. He is 100 percent a politician
|
as much as his fans adore him and revel in the fantasy that he is some high minded idealist, this is all one big game for him. He gets to give speeches, jet all over the country, have his fans fawn all over him, all on the money they give him for his campaign.
I had thought a few years ago he might finally make good on his teasing to go third party in a presidential this go around. BUT, I think you are absolutely right, that he won't do it because of Rand. |
Response to TBF (Reply #2)
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 04:30 AM
UCmeNdc (859 posts)
12. Ron Paul is no threat to Mitt Romney
|
Ron Paul is no threat he has not won a single state. Mitt's people could care less if Ron Paul stays in or gets out.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:11 PM
Mosaic (1,346 posts)
3. I can't stand libertarians
|
Any of them.
|
Response to Mosaic (Reply #3)
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 11:15 PM
MindMover (2,798 posts)
4. Libertarians = Anarchists.....
libertarianism-anarchy-for-rich-people |
Response to MindMover (Reply #4)
Tue May 22, 2012, 11:55 PM
ZombieHorde (23,846 posts)
27. Libertarians support corporate rule over government rule.
|
Anarchists prefer collectivist rule over government rule.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:39 AM
Ikonoklast (21,626 posts)
8. Fuck Ron Paul.
|
Obligatory, and you guys all missed it.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 12:13 PM
treestar (40,449 posts)
9. Lately a lot of amateurish looking Ron Paul for President signs have been going up
|
Like just now, which is odd timing, since Mittens has it almost wrapped up. So maybe the third party theory is true.
|
Response to treestar (Reply #9)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 02:16 PM
Blue_Tires (31,659 posts)
18. It fits in with the faux-grassroots/outsider/populist/occupy movement
|
Last edited Mon May 21, 2012, 10:20 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) I live in a big Paulite area and will see old spraypainted bedsheets hung from highway overpasses and rudimentary wooden sign in yards...Don't his campaign acolytes realize how laughably low-rent and amateurish it makes him look? He's running for goddamned POTUS, not homecoming king!
In '08 they even had homeless guys at busy intersections holding Paul signs (one of them was even quoted in the paper)...Classy... |
Response to Blue_Tires (Reply #18)
Mon May 21, 2012, 06:42 PM
Ptah (25,021 posts)
22. Paultard is an insult derived from retard, which is hurtful, rude and insensitive.
|
Please find a different insult.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 11:26 PM
and-justice-for-all (14,763 posts)
10. No one is cares...
|
Paul is a horrible little man.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 02:33 AM
Drunken Irishman (24,587 posts)
11. Ron Paul's campaign is proof positive how dumb libertarians are...
|
They're throwing how much money to keep his campaign alive and what are they getting out of it? He's not won ONE fucking primary. I would be pissed if I gave a thousand dollars to a candidate and he didn't do squat shit with my money. What has Paul done? He's irrelevant, even when every candidate drops out.
Could you imagine his presidency? He'd take all our money, cut programs, lower taxes for the wealthy and we'd still get stuck paying for, and getting absolutely nothing - just like his campaign. |
Response to Drunken Irishman (Reply #11)
Sun Apr 22, 2012, 06:17 PM
ellisonz (26,318 posts)
13. +1000
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 06:26 AM
JHB (17,803 posts)
14. Farmer Paul knows how to milk his cash cow
|
Unlike Palin, who is an amateur grifter, Paul shows us how a professional does it.
|
Response to JHB (Reply #14)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 02:04 PM
Blue_Tires (31,659 posts)
17. He did the same thing in '08, too
|
Raked in tons of cash even after being one of the first ones to drop out
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 10:08 AM
WI_DEM (32,522 posts)
15. So? he's not going to win anything. It's just a waste of time.
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 10:54 AM
Arkana (22,206 posts)
16. Except Ron Paul is a psychotic racist that Democrats (and most of the GOP) wouldn't touch
|
with a ten-foot pole.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 02:40 PM
FSogol (16,011 posts)
19. And less than 10 delegates.
|
He's not running for President, he's grifting for reelection funds for him and his son Turd Paul.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 05:53 PM
NNRA (11 posts)
20. Ron Paul
|
Paul may be Romeny's running mate. He's a southern republican. He may be responsible for the tea party. I don't rule him out.
|
Response to NNRA (Reply #20)
Mon Apr 23, 2012, 05:58 PM
maddezmom (130,825 posts)
21. ron paul is a Libertarian racist dirtbag
|
but if Rmoney picks him it'll be a great choice if your a Dem.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:20 PM
MrSlayer (21,327 posts)
23. Take the money, run no ads, walk away richer.
|
Seems like a plan.
|
Response to MindMover (Original post)
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:31 PM
thecentristword (152 posts)
24. A Libertarian running with Republicans - what a scam
|
Regardless what you think of Libertarianism, I think him running as a Republican was a joke. I totally understand why he did it - he got attention for it (hell, we are taking about him, aren't we), but he didn't get my respect when he did this. If you are a libertarian, run as one.
|
Response to thecentristword (Reply #24)
Wed May 23, 2012, 01:34 AM
Jamaal510 (3,156 posts)
28. I question Ron Paul's credentials as a libertarian.
|
This has been bugging me for a long time. How can he call himself a libertarian while opposing gay rights and abortions? Furthermore, why is it that we haven't heard a peep from him regarding millions of people being deprived of the right to vote via ID laws? Libertarians should be among the main people fighting against those laws, considering their platform is advocation of personal liberty. I'm glad Lawrence O'Donnell called him out on a while ago.
|

