Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumScalia, Top Democratic Plant?
By Josh Marshall
Speaking for myself, its hard for me to read the sort of stuff Justice Scalia says these days without seeing red. As hes aged, hes tossed aside any pretense or desire to hide the fact that he sees himself as what originalists and advocates of judicial restraint are supposed to be against: namely, an appointed super legislator, contemptuous of Congress and happy to impose his own beliefs by judicial fiat. Hearing him rail about racial entitlement sounds more like youre listening to some sort of talk radio blowhard than a Supreme Court Justice.
Its now generally recognized (and I think its accurate, but who knows) that the Republican drive to disenfranchise minority voters in 2012 backfired spectacularly. The countrys demography has apparently hit a tipping point wherein you piss off and activate more people than you gain by playing to racial animus, hostility to immigrants and attacks on voting rights.
Yet the Supreme Court is still stuck in the 80s and 90s era of the judicial politics of racial grievance and division. The Court now seems dead set on overturning Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. After that well have cases on marriage equality, voter ID, affirmative action. The judicial calendar is stuck in a feedback loop.
I dont want to underestimate the real world damage that will be done by bad outcomes of these cases. Its real. But the political valence of all these cases, the politics they generate, seems certain to keep the public mind focused on the politics of exclusion they embody and the political coalition that put them on the bench. And thats real too.
Its now generally recognized (and I think its accurate, but who knows) that the Republican drive to disenfranchise minority voters in 2012 backfired spectacularly. The countrys demography has apparently hit a tipping point wherein you piss off and activate more people than you gain by playing to racial animus, hostility to immigrants and attacks on voting rights.
Yet the Supreme Court is still stuck in the 80s and 90s era of the judicial politics of racial grievance and division. The Court now seems dead set on overturning Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. After that well have cases on marriage equality, voter ID, affirmative action. The judicial calendar is stuck in a feedback loop.
I dont want to underestimate the real world damage that will be done by bad outcomes of these cases. Its real. But the political valence of all these cases, the politics they generate, seems certain to keep the public mind focused on the politics of exclusion they embody and the political coalition that put them on the bench. And thats real too.
http://editors.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/02/scalia_top_democratic_plant.php?ref=fpblg
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1323 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scalia, Top Democratic Plant? (Original Post)
octoberlib
Feb 2013
OP
patrice
(47,992 posts)1. "politics of exclusion" that's something I'm going to say every time I refer to Scalia. nt
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)2. Ain't THAT the truth?
"Hearing him rail about racial entitlement sounds more like youre listening to some sort of talk radio blowhard than a Supreme Court Justice."
I never think of Scalia without picturing that photo of him from a few years back, flipping the bird to someone as he stood on the steps of his church, having just attended mass.
Not only does he sound like a talk radio blowhard - he acts like one. His lack of respect for the high position he holds is a disgrace to the Supreme Court, and the country he is meant to serve.
There is more Limbaugh in the man than there is honest jurist. And given his position, that is a damned disgrace.
I never think of Scalia without picturing that photo of him from a few years back, flipping the bird to someone as he stood on the steps of his church, having just attended mass.
Not only does he sound like a talk radio blowhard - he acts like one. His lack of respect for the high position he holds is a disgrace to the Supreme Court, and the country he is meant to serve.
There is more Limbaugh in the man than there is honest jurist. And given his position, that is a damned disgrace.
life long demo
(1,113 posts)3. Could his age be affecting his mind?
Remember Rehnquist?