2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Gun Control debate can be ended simply.. and those opposed hoist on their own petard....
"Amendment II. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
ok that says REGULATIONS are required...
the type of weapon
the type of ammo
the type of clip
or are those against gun control against the constitution too?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)That last one is just for the ones that complain about the first two.
Rosco T.
(6,496 posts)otherwise you can't posses those weapons
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)to start the freaking gun debates back up?
I'm not participating in these divisive debates. I'm grabbing the Redenbachers and just spectating from here on out.
And washing it down with
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Sorry, wrong pointless argument. Skooch over.
LiberalFighter
(50,826 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)meant well equipped back then. They should be supplied to the people.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Judging from the results so far, I doubt you are going to be happy.
brooklynite
(94,480 posts)Regulations would apply to the Militia, not to the weapons. Now you COULD pass a law that says every gun owner is a member of the well-regulated Militia, with obligations for training, physical fitness, military service...
EC
(12,287 posts)there can be regulations..
former9thward
(31,963 posts)There is not one square inch of this country where guns are not regulated.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)qualifying phrase.
hack89
(39,171 posts)which has nothing to do with laws and regulations. The 18th century definition meant well equipped and trained - a well regulated militia was one that was an effective fighting force.
Blue Idaho
(5,044 posts)Its called the National Guard.
Game, set, match.