HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » This reporter definitely ...

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 03:38 PM

This reporter definitely has blood on her hands!!!!!

One would have to consider Judith Miller to be in the top 10 contributors to the lies which put us
on the devastating path to the Iraq war. We should consistently remind the N.Y. Times of their
role in the blood letting as well!

Alexander Cockburn lays it all out on the table!!



WEEKEND EDITION AUGUST 16-18, 2003
SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER SHARE ON GOOGLE MORE SHARING SERVICES
0
CounterPunch Diary Judy Miller's War
Judy Miller’s War
by ALEXANDER COCKBURN
Lay all Judith Miller’s New York Times stories end to end, from late 2001 to June 2003 and you get a desolate picture of a reporter with an agenda, both manipulating and being manipulated by US government officials, Iraqi exiles and defectors, an entire Noah’s Ark of scam-artists.

And while Miller, either under her own single by-line or with NYT colleagues, was touting the bioterror threat, her book Germs, co-authored with Times-men Steven Engelberg and William Broad was in the bookstores and climbing the best seller lists. The same day that Miller opened an envelope of white powder (which turned out to be harmless) at her desk at the New York Times, her book was #6 on the New York Times best seller list. The following week (October 21, 2001), it reached #2. By October 28, –at the height of her scare-mongering campaign–it was up to #1. If we were cynical…

We don’t have full 20/20 hindsight yet, but we do know for certain that all the sensational disclosures in Miller’s major stories between late 2001 and early summer, 2003, promoted disingenuous lies. There were no secret biolabs under Saddam’s palaces; no nuclear factories across Iraq secretly working at full tilt. A huge percentage of what Miller wrote was garbage, garbage that powered the Bush administration’s propaganda drive towards invasion.

What does that make Miller? She was a witting cheer-leader for war. She knew what she was doing.

And what does Miller’s performance make the New York Times? Didn’t any senior editors at the New York Times or even the boss, A.O. Sulzberger, ask themselves whether it was appropriate to have a trio of Times reporters touting their book Germs on tv and radio, while simultaneously running stories in the New York Times headlining the risks of biowar and thus creating just the sort of public alarm beneficial to the sales of their book. Isn’t that the sort of conflict of interest prosecutors have been hounding Wall Street punters for?

The knives are certainly out for Miller. Leaked internal email traffic disclosed Miller’s self-confessed reliance on Ahmad Chalabi, a leading Iraqi exile with every motive to produce imaginative defectors eager to testify about Saddam’s biowar, chemical and nuclear arsenal. In late June Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post ran a long story about Miller’s ability in recent months to make the US Army jump, merely by threatening to go straight to Rumsfeld.

It was funny, but again, the conflicts of interest put the New York Times in a terrible light. Here was Miller, with a contract to write a new book on the post-invasion search for "weapons of mass destruction", lodged in the Army unit charged with that search, fiercely insisting that the unit prolong its futile hunt, while simultaneously working hand in glove with Chalabi. Journalists have to do some complex dance steps to get good stories, but a few red flags should have gone up on that one.

A brisk, selective timeline:

December 20, 2001, Headline, "Iraqi Tells of Renovations at Sites For Chemical and Nuclear Arms".

Miller rolls out a new Iraqi defector, in the ripe tradition of her favorite, Khidir Hamza, the utter fraud who called himself Saddam’s Bombmaker.

Story:

"An Iraqi defector who described himself as a civil engineer said he personally worked on renovations of secret facilities for biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in underground wells, private villas and under the Saddam Hussein Hospital in Baghdad as recently as a year ago.

"The defector, Adnan Ihsan Saeed al-Haideri, gave details of the projects he said he worked on for President Saddam Hussein’s government in an extensive interview last week in Bangkok. The interview with Mr. Saeed was arranged by the Iraqi National Congress, the main Iraqi opposition group, which seeks the overthrow of Mr. Hussein.

"If verified, Mr. Saeed’s allegations would provide ammunition to officials within the Bush administration who have been arguing that Mr. Hussein should be driven from power partly because of his unwillingness to stop making weapons of mass destruction."

Notice the sedate phrase "if verified". It never was verified. But the story served its purpose.

September 7, 2002: Headline: "US says Hussein intensifies quest for a-bomb parts".

This one was by Miller and Michael Gordon, promoting the aluminum tube nonsense: "In the last 14 months, Iraq has sought to buy thousands of specially designed aluminum tubes, which American officials believe were intended as components of centrifuges to enrich uranium." All lies of course. Miller and Gordon emphasize "Mr. Hussein’s dogged insistence on pursuing his nuclear ambitions, along with what defectors described in interviews as Iraq’s push to improve and expand Baghdad’s chemical and biological arsenals".

Another of Miller’s defectors takes a bow:

"Speaking on the condition that neither he nor the country in which he was interviewed be identified, Ahmed al-Shemri, his pseudonym, said Iraq had continued developing, producing and storing chemical agents at many mobile and fixed secret sites throughout the country, many of them underground.

"All of Iraq is one large storage facility," said Mr. Shemri. Asked about his allegations, American officials said they believed these reports were accurate."

A final bit of brazen chicanery from Gordon and Miller:

"Iraq denied the existence of a germ warfare program entirely until 1995, when United Nations inspectors forced Baghdad to acknowledge it had such an effort. Then, after insisting that it had never weaponized bacteria or filled warheads, it again belatedly acknowledged having done so after Hussein Kamel, Mr. Hussein’s brother-in-law, defected to Jordan with evidence about the scale of the germ warfare program."

What Gordon and Miller leave out (or lacked the enterprise or desire to find out) is that Hussein Kamel told UN Inspectors that he had destroyed all Iraq’s WMDs, on Saddam Hussein’s orders.

September 13, 2002, headline: "White House Lists Iraq Steps To Build Banned Weapons".

Miller and Gordon again, taking at face value the administration’s claims that it was "the intelligence agencies’ unanimous view that the type of tubes that Iraq has been seeking are used to make such centrifuges."

If nothing else this shows what rotten reporters Miller and Gordon are, because it now turns out the intelligence analysts across Washington were deeply divided on precisely this issue.

September 18, 2002: "Verification Is Difficult at Best, Say the Experts, and Maybe Impossible".

This is Miller helping the War Party lay down a preemptive barrage against the UN Inspectors: "verifying Iraq’s assertions that it has abandoned weapons of mass destruction, or finding evidence that it has not done so, may not be feasible,
according to officials and former weapons inspectors"

A cameo appearance by Khidhir Hamza reporting his supposed knowledge that "Iraq was now at the ‘pilot plant’ stage of nuclear production and within two to three years of mass producing centrifuges to enrich uranium for a bomb."

December 3, 2002, a Miller Special, murky with unidentified informants: "C.I.A. Hunts Iraq Tie to Soviet Smallpox".

Classic Miller: "The C.I.A. is investigating an informant’s accusation that Iraq obtained a particularly virulent strain of smallpox from a Russian scientist who worked in a smallpox lab in Moscow during Soviet times"

January 24, 2003:"Defectors Bolster U.S. Case Against Iraq, Officials Say".

Another Miller onslaught on the UN inspectors:

"Former Iraqi scientists, military officers and contractors have provided American intelligence agencies with a portrait of Saddam Hussein’s secret programs to develop and conceal chemical, biological and nuclear weapons that is starkly at odds with the findings so far of the United Nations weapons inspectors."

Al-Haideri is still in play: "Intelligence officials said that some of the most valuable information has come from Adnan Ihsan Saeed al-Haideri, a contractor who fled Iraq in the summer of 2001. He later told American officials that chemical and biological weapons laboratories were hidden beneath hospitals and inside presidential palaces. Mr. Haideri was relocated anonymously to a small town in Virginia."

We’ll leave al-Haideri in well-earned retirement and Miller heading towards her supreme triumph of April 20, 2003, relaying the allegations of chemical and bio-weapon dumps made by an unnamed Iraqi scientist she’d never met.

20 replies, 3788 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
Reply This reporter definitely has blood on her hands!!!!! (Original post)
busterbrown Feb 2013 OP
OregonBlue Feb 2013 #1
Sunlei Feb 2013 #2
FleetwoodMac Feb 2013 #3
midwest irish Feb 2013 #4
busterbrown Feb 2013 #5
midwest irish Feb 2013 #6
Cha Feb 2013 #7
patrice Feb 2013 #8
xtraxritical Feb 2013 #9
rgbecker Feb 2013 #11
AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #10
Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2013 #16
Faygo Kid Feb 2013 #12
bvar22 Feb 2013 #13
LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #14
blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #15
donheld Feb 2013 #17
LineNew Reply ^
Wilms Feb 2013 #18
Carolina Feb 2013 #19
busterbrown Feb 2013 #20

Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 03:50 PM

1. Wonder how much Cheney paid her to print their lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OregonBlue (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 03:55 PM

2. Cheney probably did the republican trick of buying all her books to get on the best seller lists.

and I edit to add..to buy all the books places the money into the authors hands. It's a great way to pay a person without handing them cash.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 04:05 PM

3. I wonder if her Pulitzer could be revoked (NT)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 04:32 PM

4. The way I heard it

 

Is that Miller probably bought into everything because she loved the cloak-and-dagger aspect of getting the information. She was supposedly meeting with "top" White House, DoD, and State Dept people in dark parking garages. She would be given dossiers or "top secret" intel info. Real Tom Clancy type stuff. These people very likely weren't from any of those Departments, they were stooges working for Cheney, et al. It's just kinda suspicious when all her stories cited unnamed "American officials" and "American intelligence experts." She was being fed this information from someone/somewhere connected with the Administration.


It was a fun romantic sorta thing for her, she loved that lifestyle and was willing to do what she was told to continue. She was drunk on the connections, being a "part of the loop." The end results is thousands dead and billions of dollars lost. I hope she had a good time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to midwest irish (Reply #4)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 04:40 PM

5. Her life wasn’t disturbed a bit!!!

In fact she was a bit of a celebrity back then.. The amazing thing I’d love to know is how she rationalized the severe damaged she has perpetrated on humanity..
You Know..... How was I suppose to know Chalabi was lying? Or, The whole world thought Saddam was trying to procure tubing? She’s disgusting!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 04:49 PM

6. Yeah

 

If she was a real journalist (or even bothered ) she would have fact checked, done serious research. That is what journalism is. I remember reading her articles when I was 19 and thinking "oh crap, the NYT says this stuff is real. There must be something going on." How many 19 year olds just like me ended up dead because Miller wanted the spotlight?

These blatant lies, with no regard for objectivity or fact checking, are, like you said, disgusting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 05:24 PM

7. Thanks buster.. I knew it was going to be

Judith Miller. This is from Dec 2010.. I don't know if she's still there or what she's doing now..nor do I care.

Judith Miller: From the Times to the nuts


A former superstar reporter finds refuge among the right wing, who don't care how much she got wrong

Judith Miller used to be a superstar. She was a major reporter at the New York Times for decades — at the DC bureau, in Cairo, in Paris, special correspondent to the Persian Gulf, embedded with a special unit in Iraq. She had the best sources. She had amazing scoops. Now she’s writing — on contract, not full-time — for Newsmax, a goofy right-wing magazine where conservatives you’ve never heard of (and John Stossel, apparently) report, constantly, that Barack Obama is bad and unpopular. It’s a steep fall, and it couldn’t have happened to a worse journalist.

Since her early days at the Times, when she inserted CIA misinformation into a piece on Libya, she’s always been a tool of power. She was the voice of the Defense Department, embedded at the Times. She was hyping bullshit stories about Iraq’s WMD capabilities as far back as 1998, and in the run-up to the war, her front-page scoops were cited by the Bush administration as evidence that Saddam needed to be taken out, right away.


And now she writes for Newsmax, also the home of this guy with an eyepatch who calls himself a “global economic warrior” and used to be married to Peggy Noonan.

http://www.salon.com/2010/12/30/judy_miller_newsmax/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 05:55 PM

8. Absolutely correct. Possibly on meds to block visions of mutilated Iraqi children & US troop coffins

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 06:07 PM

9. Pretty old news now and it was widely reported at the time books have been written about it.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xtraxritical (Reply #9)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 06:18 PM

11. Even old news needs to be rehashed on occasion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 06:11 PM

10. 'Curve Ball'

His fucking code name should have been a clue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AtheistCrusader (Reply #10)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 07:06 PM

16. Exactly

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 06:20 PM

12. I recall how incensed I was reading her junk

It was all madness, all of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 06:34 PM

13. Judith Miller deserves #1 Propagandist with Blood of INNOCENTS on Her Hands,

but so does Meet the Press
and the Fox News Corporation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 07:02 PM

14. What financial benefit did she receive from anyone connected

with the Bush administration. If that can be determined it would make it worse for her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 07:05 PM

15. looking back?/nothing to see here!/forward!(tm)

:~p

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Thu Feb 21, 2013, 01:44 AM

17. I wonder how much she was paid when she sold her soul.

I wonder if it was worth it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Thu Feb 21, 2013, 09:40 AM

18. ^

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Thu Feb 21, 2013, 02:21 PM

19. so does the NYT

and all the other media outlets who allowed the lies to go unchecked.

I would always scream at the TV (until I turned it off):

How does a country the US bombed to smithereens in 1991 and then kept under sanctions the entire post-war time magically morph into an imminent threat?

It doesn't!

Where did those alleged chemical weapons come from?

The US in 1988 under what president/presidential cabal... the same jackals (squatters) installed in the White House who were promoting war!

Why aren't they listening to Scott Ritter and the weapons inspectors?

They didn't want the truth, they wanted war because it's good for their bottom line

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Fri Feb 22, 2013, 12:34 AM

20. Yep...

Its all so simple.... Go against anything Bush, after they throw us into a lying war, automatically becomes; You don’t support the troops.... That goes for anything domestic
as well.... Fucking landing on that aircraft carrier with that metal can around his dick, man
How is this guy able to get to sleep at night. ? Whats the name of his M.D. thats a good start..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread