HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Politics 2014 (Forum) » Filibuster reform would h...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:14 PM

Filibuster reform would have saved Hagel


Forget what you've heard. Had robust filibuster reform gone into effect, GOP would have lost the cloture motion

BY ALEX SEITZ-WALD


In light of the filibuster of Chuck Hagel, Senate rules reform advocates are having a bit of an “I told you so” moment, lamenting the fact that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other Democratic leaders agreed to a weak filibuster tweak last month instead of one of the more robust plans reformers had hoped for. In response, it’s been noted that those proposals would not have eliminated the filibuster or even the 60 vote threshold needed to break one.

But that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t have helped Hagel. In fact, if Oregon Democrat Jeff Merkley’s plan had been in effect yesterday afternoon when the Senate voted on cloture, the vote would have succeeded and Hagel would be one step closer to confirmation.

Here’s why: While Merkley’s “talking filibuster” idea got the most attention, one plan the reformers would flip the burden for preserving a filibuster from the majority to the minority. Right now, the majority (Democrats) need to assemble 60 votes to break a filibuster, regardless of how many Republicans vote against cloture — anything less than that means the vote dies. So, under yesterday’s 58-40 vote, Democrats couldn’t move the vote forward.

But under a plan that Merkley and others pushed, the reverse would be true: The minority (Republicans) would need to assemble 41 votes to prove they can stop a cloture motion, and any absent senators in the minority would be considered in the affirmative. Again, yesterday’s vote was 58-40, meaning Republicans would have fallen one vote short of preserving their filibuster against Hagel. In that alternative universe, all that would stand between Hagel and confirmation would be 30-hours of post-cloture debate and a final vote, which only requires a 51 vote simple majority to succeed. He could be confirmed this weekend.

more:
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/filibuster_reform_would_have_saved_hagel/

1 replies, 462 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Filibuster reform would have saved Hagel (Original post)
DonViejo Feb 2013 OP
badgolfer Feb 2013 #1

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 12:22 PM

1. Dems against reform

Leahy, Levin, Boxer, Feinstein, Bachus, Reed, and a couple others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread