Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 09:26 AM Feb 2013

Farmer’s use of genetically modified soybeans grows into Supreme Court case

Farmer Hugh Bowman hardly looks the part of a revolutionary who stands in the way of promising new biotech discoveries and threatens Monsanto’s pursuit of new products it says will “feed the world.”

“Hell’s fire,” said the 75-year-old self-described “eccentric old bachelor,” who farms 300 acres of land passed down from his father. Bowman rested in a recliner, boots off, the tag that once held his Foster Grant reading glasses to a drugstore rack still attached, a Monsanto gimme cap perched ironically on his balding head. “I am less than a drop in the bucket.”

Yet Bowman’s unorthodox soybean farming techniques have landed him at the center of a national battle over genetically modified crops. His legal battle, now at the Supreme Court, raises questions about whether the right to patent living things extends to their progeny, and how companies that engage in cutting-edge research can recoup their investments.

What Bowman did was to take commodity grain from the local elevator, which is usually used for feed, and plant it. But that grain was mostly progeny of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready beans because that’s what most Indiana soybean farmers grow. Those soybeans are genetically modified to survive the weedkiller Roundup, and Monsanto claims that Bowman’s planting violated the company’s restrictions.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/farmers-use-of-genetically-modified-soybeans-grows-into-supreme-court-case/2013/02/09/8729f05a-717c-11e2-ac36-3d8d9dcaa2e2_story.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Farmer’s use of genetically modified soybeans grows into Supreme Court case (Original Post) Redfairen Feb 2013 OP
Companies should not have the right to ownership of products after it is sold. LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #1
agreed ... a great Idea. littlewolf Feb 2013 #2
That is pretty much what the seed companies do LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #3
Yes, it's quite outrageous, Monsanto's whole business plan these days is basically extortion ShadowLiberal Feb 2013 #4
Fuck Monsanto Tagish_Charlie Feb 2013 #5

LiberalFighter

(50,793 posts)
1. Companies should not have the right to ownership of products after it is sold.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:04 AM
Feb 2013

A car company can't dictate how fast I can drive my car or which states I am allowed to drive. Or whether I must junk my car after so many years.

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
2. agreed ... a great Idea.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:21 AM
Feb 2013

so lets see if I have this right. Farmer Joe Smith plants roundup ready beans, harvest them and sells them to the granary. This farmer buys
the beans from the granary and plants them and now the people that developed the seeds and sold them to farmer Joe Smith claim ownership?
Bull$hit.

I do not see how this can be legal, and the only way they can win
is by running up the legal costs to the point the farmer can not keep up.

LiberalFighter

(50,793 posts)
3. That is pretty much what the seed companies do
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:49 AM
Feb 2013

If any of the genetics get transferred from one field to another they claim ownership of any products created with the cross pollination.

ShadowLiberal

(2,237 posts)
4. Yes, it's quite outrageous, Monsanto's whole business plan these days is basically extortion
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:25 AM
Feb 2013

Monsanto should have NEVER been given a patent on genetic modifications, especially on the off spring of seeds Monsanto sells.

Monsanto has a long history of going around suing farmers simply because their neighbors buy Monsanto seeds, and then within a few years nature takes it's course, and the wind blows Monsanto's seeds into the neighbor farmer's land and grows there. That's how nature intended plants to spread their seeds long before anyone farmed them. Monsanto suing people over that is basically extortion or economic terrorism in my opinion, you have no way of protecting yourself from nature taking it's course, except to pay Monsanto the ransom by buying their seeds in the first place, which only gives Monsanto more money to hire lawyers to sue other people in the same situation.

The only reason Monsanto has been able to get away with this for so long is because it's only farmers they go after. If they dared sued home owners all across America and other nations who don't even have a garden just because of their seeds spreading like nature intended then the laws would have been changed and their patents revoked long ago.

 

Tagish_Charlie

(85 posts)
5. Fuck Monsanto
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:46 PM
Feb 2013

This company is the most evil insidious threat to our well being. Messing with genetics they way Monsanto does is opening up a can of worms that we are presently unable to comprehend. The potential for harm is incalculable. Their arrogance that they know better than God about the genetic nature of creation is nauseating and their assertion that the by can do better than creation is ridiculous and dangerous. Sadly SCOTUS is bought and paid for by business so we know how this case will go. After all aren't corporations people?
Fuck Monsanto

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Farmer’s use of genetical...