Fri Feb 8, 2013, 07:11 PM
Purveyor (13,424 posts)
The Ever-Shifting Confidence of the Anonymous Anti-Hagel Sources
By David Weigel | Posted Friday, Feb. 8, 2013, at 4:32 PM ET
Carl Levin is pushing past the GOP's request for a proctology-level examination of Chuck Hagel's foundation ties. The anti-Hagelians don't miss a step. Today's meme, as CTRL+F'd by Jennifer Rubin, is that Hagel is probably hiding something—"a host of shadowy figures whose identities Hagel is so insistent on concealing." Yes, Hagel released information in line with the committee's standards and requests, but when Henry Kissinger was up for the 9/11 Commission, Democrats wanted similar information from him—the sin of hypocrisy, if hypocrisy can be applied to how one feels about an apple after stating one's opinion about an orange. Innuendo aside, I'm struck by the return of the anti-Hagelians' greatest, yet most disappointing ally: The anonymous Senate staffer. A "disgusted" staffer tells Rubin that the nomination could be sunk, if only this information were released. What else have we heard from staffers? December 13, 2012: Republicans will prove Hagel's racism! In response to reports that Barack Obama is likely to choose Chuck Hagel to be the next secretary of defense, a top Republican Senate aide emails, "Send us Hagel and we will make sure every American knows he is an anti-Semite." --clip So we've gone from, "We'll prove he's an anti-Semite," to, "We proved it, he's done," to, "We might block him because of the hearing," to, today, "Maybe we can prove he's tied to foreigners?" Feel the momentum. more... http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/02/08/the_ever_shifting_confidence_of_the_anonymous_anti_hagel_sources.html
|
4 replies, 499 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Purveyor | Feb 2013 | OP | |
| TwilightGardener | Feb 2013 | #1 | |
| trueblue2007 | Feb 2013 | #4 | |
| davidpdx | Feb 2013 | #2 | |
| MjolnirTime | Feb 2013 | #3 |
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Fri Feb 8, 2013, 07:51 PM
TwilightGardener (39,696 posts)
1. Did Bob Corker ever come up with all those angry Hagel staffers who were lining up and coming
|
forward to complain about Hagel's temperament? Binders full of them.
|
Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #1)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 05:18 PM
trueblue2007 (5,104 posts)
4. Bob Corker & "the angry Hagel staffers" must be lying
|
lining up and coming forward to complain about Hagel's temperament?
WHERE ARE ALL THESE STAFFERS? WHERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRE ARE THEY? there are Binders full of them? Lololol, sure. |
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:32 AM
davidpdx (9,127 posts)
2. The Republican are sure trying hard to smear him
|
The idea that Kissinger had to to present information to get on the 9/11 commission means that they can try to force Hagel to do the same is ludicrous. There have been several SoD nominated without the information. It's nothing but a fishing expedition. This is typical for them. They did the same thing to Clinton with the investigations during his presidency.
|
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 01:47 PM
MjolnirTime (1,415 posts)

