Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 02:29 AM Feb 2013

Democratic Senator Floats Plan To Raise $200 Billion By Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes

A Democratic Senator wants to raise $200 billion over ten years by closing corporate tax loopholes, according to Bloomberg News. Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) wants to ditch a slew of goodies for corporations, as well as a loophole that allows wealthy money managers to pay far less in taxes than middle-class families:
Senator Carl Levin’s push to close tax loopholes will target corporate deductions for stock options and rates on investment income known as carried interest, seeking to raise at least $200 billion by one estimate.
In a memo to Democratic Senate committee leaders on Friday, the Michigan Democrat described proposals to end what he called excessive corporate tax deductions, scrap the blended tax rate for derivatives such as commodity futures and strengthen enforcement of the tax code, Bloomberg BNA reported. [...]
The plan is estimated to raise at least $200 billion over 10 years, according to a person with knowledge of the details. Levin told reporters he was sharing ideas with fellow senators and had asked the congressional Joint Tax Committee to estimate budget costs and savings for the provisions.
Republicans (and plenty of Democrats) like to talk about revenue-neutral corporate tax reform, in which every dollar raised if offset by a reduction in the corporate tax rate. Levin has consistently opposed this approach, and for good reason.
Corporate profits are currently at record highs while corporate taxes have plummeted. Corporations paid just a 12.1 percent effective tax rate in 2011. The corporate income tax used to make up about one-third of federal revenue, but today it makes up less than 9 percent. The corporate income tax used to follow along with corporate profits, but the two have become decoupled, with negative impacts for the federal budget:



http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/04/1539271/levin-200-billion-corporate-tax/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic Senator Floats Plan To Raise $200 Billion By Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes (Original Post) octoberlib Feb 2013 OP
Obama Sets Sights On 'Carried Interest,' Lucrative Tax Deduction Used By Romney Tx4obama Feb 2013 #1
Elections have consequences, huh. freshwest Feb 2013 #2
Thanks for the info! octoberlib Feb 2013 #3
thanks to harry reid the repubs have senate majority. good luck with these lol nt msongs Feb 2013 #4
+1 davidpdx Feb 2013 #6
lol Drunken Irishman Feb 2013 #7
What do Senators Levin and Feinstein have in common? davidpdx Feb 2013 #5
Ocean, meet spit. Scuba Feb 2013 #8

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
1. Obama Sets Sights On 'Carried Interest,' Lucrative Tax Deduction Used By Romney
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 02:49 AM
Feb 2013

Obama Sets Sights On 'Carried Interest,' Lucrative Tax Deduction Used By Romney

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/04/carried-interest_n_2617817.html



octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
3. Thanks for the info!
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 03:12 AM
Feb 2013

That's good news. The above chart is really jarring. The corporate tax rate is just ridiculously low. And all the CEO's can do is bitch about entitlements and the ACA.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
7. lol
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 05:36 AM
Feb 2013

That's a funny one! I forgot the Democrats were in control of the House too!



You do realize, even if Harry Reid had passed filibuster reform, we'd still have to face a Republican controlled House, right?

lol

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. What do Senators Levin and Feinstein have in common?
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 04:50 AM
Feb 2013

Both are pushing major initiatives (Levin corporate taxes, Feinstein the assault weapons ban) and both opposed filibuster reform. I can't believe that either of them are naive to believe their initiatives are going to go anywhere. They might as well have been on the Titanic.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Democratic Senator Floats...